These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25087370)

  • 41. Decision making in acute care: a practical framework supporting the 'best interests' principle.
    Bailey S
    Nurs Ethics; 2006 May; 13(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 16711187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Deficiencies and Missed Opportunities to Formulate Clinical Guidelines in Australia for Withholding or Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Treatment in Severely Disabled and Impaired Infants.
    Bhatia N; Tibballs J
    J Bioeth Inq; 2015 Sep; 12(3):449-59. PubMed ID: 25173981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Withdrawing or withholding life-sustaining clinically-assisted nutrition and hydration.
    Griffith R
    Br J Community Nurs; 2017 Dec; 22(12):615-617. PubMed ID: 29189051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The best interests standard: a comparison of the state's parens patriae authority and judicial oversight in best interests determinations for children and incompetent patients.
    Griffith DB
    Issues Law Med; 1991; 7(3):283-338. PubMed ID: 1765451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Considering the boundaries of decision-making authority: An NHS Trust v Y [2018] UKSC 46.
    Richards B
    J Bioeth Inq; 2019 Jun; 16(2):153-157. PubMed ID: 31134416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Precedent autonomy should be respected in life-sustaining treatment decisions.
    Hebron AL; McGee S
    J Med Ethics; 2014 Oct; 40(10):714-6. PubMed ID: 24567422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Who Knows Best (Interests)? The Case of Charlie Gard.
    Cave E; Nottingham E
    Med Law Rev; 2018 Aug; 26(3):500-513. PubMed ID: 29253235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Withholding and withdrawing treatment, ethical and legal aspects].
    Pedersen R; Bahus MK; Kvisle EM
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Jun; 127(12):1648-50. PubMed ID: 17571104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparing doctors' legal compliance across three Australian states for decisions whether to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining medical treatment: does different law lead to different decisions?
    White BP; Willmott L; Cartwright C; Parker M; Williams G; Davis J
    BMC Palliat Care; 2017 Nov; 16(1):63. PubMed ID: 29179708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. CAN THE COURTS FORCE THE DOCTOR'S HAND? ST GEORGE'S HEALTHCARE NHS TRUST V P [2015] EWCOP 42.
    Youngs JC
    Med Law Rev; 2016; 24(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 26601677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy: all systems are not yet "go".
    Snider GL
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 1995 Feb; 151(2):279-81. PubMed ID: 11654310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The ultimate test of autonomy: should minors have a right to make decisions regarding life-sustaining treatment?
    Rosato JL
    Rutgers Law Rev; 1996; 49(1):1-103. PubMed ID: 11865878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Medical decision making and the Human Rights Act 1998.
    Loughrey J
    Med Law; 2001; 20(4):493-505. PubMed ID: 11817380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Seeking an order to withdraw treatment from the Court of Protection.
    Griffith R
    Br J Community Nurs; 2018 Dec; 23(12):615-617. PubMed ID: 30521393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Does withdrawing life-sustaining treatment cause death or allow the patient to die?
    McGee A
    Med Law Rev; 2014; 22(1):26-47. PubMed ID: 24421396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Cruzan and the right to die: a perspective on privacy interests.
    Watson DE
    Mercer Law Rev; 1991; 42(3):1147-81. PubMed ID: 11651439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The legal role of medical professionals in decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment: Part 3 (Victoria).
    Willmott L; White B; Parker M; Cartwright C
    J Law Med; 2011 Jun; 18(4):773-97. PubMed ID: 21774274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Someone to watch over me: medical decision-making for hopelessly ill incompetent adult patients.
    Dippel DL
    Akron Law Rev; 1991; 24(3-4):639-80. PubMed ID: 16144098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Palliative care and other physicians' knowledge, attitudes and practice relating to the law on withholding/withdrawing life-sustaining treatment: Survey results.
    Cartwright CM; White BP; Willmott L; Williams G; Parker MH
    Palliat Med; 2016 Feb; 30(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 26001394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Is providing elective ventilation in the best interests of potential donors?
    McGee AJ; White BP
    J Med Ethics; 2013 Mar; 39(3):135-8. PubMed ID: 23322681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.