These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25087370)

  • 61. Is providing elective ventilation in the best interests of potential donors?
    McGee AJ; White BP
    J Med Ethics; 2013 Mar; 39(3):135-8. PubMed ID: 23322681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. [Discontinuation of futile therapy].
    Bülow HH; Hartling OJ
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2007 Feb; 169(8):717-9. PubMed ID: 17313925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Ethical aspects of withdrawing and withholding treatment.
    Wainwright P; Gallagher A
    Nurs Stand; 2007 Apr 25-May 1; 21(33):46-50. PubMed ID: 17494444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Does Declaration of Brain Death Serve the Best Interest of Organ Donors Rather Than Merely Facilitating Organ Transplantation?
    Clarke MJ; Fenton KN; Sade RM
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Jun; 101(6):2053-8. PubMed ID: 27112652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Using mediation in situations of withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment: a New South Wales perspective.
    Bowen T
    J Law Med; 2009 Aug; 17(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 19771988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Is There a Role for Law in Medical Practice When Withholding and Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Medical Treatment? Empirical Findings on Attitudes of Doctors.
    Willmott L; White B; Parker M; Cartwright C; Williams G
    J Law Med; 2016; 24(2):342-55. PubMed ID: 30137708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Reconciling Quinlan and Saikewicz: decision making for the terminally ill incompetent.
    Annas GJ
    Am J Law Med; 1979; 4(4):367-96. PubMed ID: 507056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. The legal role of medical professionals in decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment: part 1 (New South Wales).
    White B; Willmott L; Trowse P; Parker M; Cartwright C
    J Law Med; 2011 Mar; 18(3):498-522. PubMed ID: 21528737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Viewing the "Draft guidelines for state court decision making in authorizing or withdrawing life-sustaining medical treatment" from the perspective of related areas of law and economics: a critique.
    Gorby JD
    Issues Law Med; 1992; 7(4):477-510. PubMed ID: 1563939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Ethical and legal issues in cases of withdrawing treatment from an incompetent patient in Italy.
    Veshi D
    Med Law; 2013 Dec; 32(4):577-85. PubMed ID: 24552117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Assisting death or letting die? Withdrawing treatment at the patients' request.
    Baldwin A; Hurley C
    Nurs Crit Care; 2002; 7(5):241-6. PubMed ID: 12448506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Decision-making at the end-of-life and the incompetent patient: a comparative approach.
    Halliday S; Witteck L
    Med Law; 2003; 22(3):533-42. PubMed ID: 14626885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. In re Terwilliger.
    Pennsylvania. Superior Court
    Atl Report; 1982 Sep; 450():1376-86. PubMed ID: 11648535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Refusal of potentially life-saving treatment for minors: The emerging international consensus by courts.
    Freckelton I; McGregor S
    J Law Med; 2016 Jun; 23(4):813-34. PubMed ID: 30136557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Capacity and medical self-determination in Australia.
    Rothschild A
    J Law Med; 2007 Feb; 14(3):403-24. PubMed ID: 17355102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Balancing Patient and Societal Interests in Decisions About Potentially Life-Sustaining Treatment : An Australian Policy Analysis.
    Close E; White BP; Willmott L
    J Bioeth Inq; 2020 Sep; 17(3):407-421. PubMed ID: 32964352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. A defence of the requirement to seek consent to withhold and withdraw futile treatments.
    Stewart CL
    Med J Aust; 2012 Apr; 196(6):406-8. PubMed ID: 22471544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Legal aspects of withdrawal of therapy.
    Young RJ; King A
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2003 Oct; 31(5):501-8. PubMed ID: 14601271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Conceptions of dignity in the Charlie Gard, Alfie Evans and Isaiah Haastrup cases.
    Jonas M; Evans A
    Bioethics; 2020 Sep; 34(7):687-694. PubMed ID: 32562283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. The due process "right to life" in Cruzan and its impact on "right-to-die" law.
    Bopp J; Avila D
    Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1991; 53(1):193-233. PubMed ID: 11652639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.