These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25087617)

  • 21. Contribution of consonant versus vowel information to sentence intelligibility for young normal-hearing and elderly hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kewley-Port D; Burkle TZ; Lee JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2365-75. PubMed ID: 17902871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Electrophysiology and Perception of Speech in Noise in Older Listeners: Effects of Hearing Impairment and Age.
    Billings CJ; Penman TM; McMillan GP; Ellis EM
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):710-22. PubMed ID: 26502191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of training rate on recognition of spectrally shifted speech.
    Nogaki G; Fu QJ; Galvin JJ
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 17496666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Contribution of spectrotemporal features on auditory event-related potentials elicited by consonant-vowel syllables.
    Digeser FM; Wohlberedt T; Hoppe U
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):704-12. PubMed ID: 19672195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Recognition of digitized CV syllables in multitalker babble.
    Gordon-Salant S
    Audiology; 1985; 24(4):241-53. PubMed ID: 4051874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Consonant identification in noise using Hilbert-transform temporal fine-structure speech and recovered-envelope speech for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Léger AC; Reed CM; Desloge JG; Swaminathan J; Braida LD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):389-403. PubMed ID: 26233038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of noise suppression on intelligibility: experts' opinions and naive normal-hearing listeners' performance.
    Hilkhuysen GL; Gaubitch N; Huckvale M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Apr; 56(2):404-15. PubMed ID: 23090965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Perception of prominence by Estonian and English listeners.
    Lehiste I; Fox RA
    Lang Speech; 1992; 35 ( Pt 4)():419-34. PubMed ID: 1339921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Auditory detection of non-speech and speech stimuli in noise: Effects of listeners' native language background.
    Liu C; Jin SH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Nov; 138(5):2782-90. PubMed ID: 26627754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Relationship between perception of spectral ripple and speech recognition in cochlear implant and vocoder listeners.
    Litvak LM; Spahr AJ; Saoji AA; Fridman GY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):982-91. PubMed ID: 17672646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Speech recognition and working memory capacity in young-elderly listeners: effects of hearing sensitivity.
    Cervera TC; Soler MJ; Dasi C; Ruiz JC
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Sep; 63(3):216-26. PubMed ID: 19739905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Within-consonant perceptual differences in the hearing impaired ear.
    Trevino A; Allen JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):607-17. PubMed ID: 23862835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Recognition of Deep Band Modulated Consonants in Quiet and Noise in Older Individuals with and Without Hearing Loss.
    Shetty HN; Kooknoor V
    J Int Adv Otol; 2016 Dec; 12(3):282-289. PubMed ID: 27897126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Consonant Perception in Connected Syllables Spoken at a Conversational Syllabic Rate.
    Phatak SA; Zion DJ; Grant KW
    Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165231156673. PubMed ID: 36794551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A method to identify noise-robust perceptual features: application for consonant /t/.
    Régnier MS; Allen JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 May; 123(5):2801-14. PubMed ID: 18529196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparing auditory filter bandwidths, spectral ripple modulation detection, spectral ripple discrimination, and speech recognition: Normal and impaired hearing.
    Davies-Venn E; Nelson P; Souza P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):492-503. PubMed ID: 26233047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The interpretation of speech reception threshold data in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: II. Fluctuating noise.
    Smits C; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):3004-15. PubMed ID: 23654404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
    Maniwa K; Jongman A; Wade T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1114-25. PubMed ID: 18247912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. English vowel identification in long-term speech-shaped noise and multi-talker babble for English and Chinese listeners.
    Mi L; Tao S; Wang W; Dong Q; Jin SH; Liu C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL391-7. PubMed ID: 23656099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.