These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25087777)

  • 1. Hip contact force in presence of aberrant bone geometry during normal and pathological gait.
    Bosmans L; Wesseling M; Desloovere K; Molenaers G; Scheys L; Jonkers I
    J Orthop Res; 2014 Nov; 32(11):1406-15. PubMed ID: 25087777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of altered proximal femoral geometry in impaired pelvis stability and hip control during CP gait: A simulation study.
    Bosmans L; Jansen K; Wesseling M; Molenaers G; Scheys L; Jonkers I
    Gait Posture; 2016 Feb; 44():61-7. PubMed ID: 27004634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correlation between lower limb bone morphology and gait characteristics in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy.
    Carriero A; Zavatsky A; Stebbins J; Theologis T; Shefelbine SJ
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2009; 29(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 19098651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Subject-specific hip geometry and hip joint centre location affects calculated contact forces at the hip during gait.
    Lenaerts G; Bartels W; Gelaude F; Mulier M; Spaepen A; Van der Perre G; Jonkers I
    J Biomech; 2009 Jun; 42(9):1246-51. PubMed ID: 19464012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A multi-scale modelling framework combining musculoskeletal rigid-body simulations with adaptive finite element analyses, to evaluate the impact of femoral geometry on hip joint contact forces and femoral bone growth.
    Kainz H; Killen BA; Wesseling M; Perez-Boerema F; Pitto L; Garcia Aznar JM; Shefelbine S; Jonkers I
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235966. PubMed ID: 32702015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of hip muscle weakness and femoral bony deformities on gait performance.
    Vandekerckhove I; Wesseling M; Kainz H; Desloovere K; Jonkers I
    Gait Posture; 2021 Jan; 83():280-286. PubMed ID: 33227606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Level of subject-specific detail in musculoskeletal models affects hip moment arm length calculation during gait in pediatric subjects with increased femoral anteversion.
    Scheys L; Desloovere K; Suetens P; Jonkers I
    J Biomech; 2011 Apr; 44(7):1346-53. PubMed ID: 21295307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Personalized MR-based musculoskeletal models compared to rescaled generic models in the presence of increased femoral anteversion: effect on hip moment arm lengths.
    Scheys L; Van Campenhout A; Spaepen A; Suetens P; Jonkers I
    Gait Posture; 2008 Oct; 28(3):358-65. PubMed ID: 18571416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Subject-specific hip geometry affects predicted hip joint contact forces during gait.
    Lenaerts G; De Groote F; Demeulenaere B; Mulier M; Van der Perre G; Spaepen A; Jonkers I
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(6):1243-52. PubMed ID: 18346745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hip- and patellofemoral-joint loading during gait are increased in children with idiopathic torsional deformities.
    Passmore E; Graham HK; Pandy MG; Sangeux M
    Gait Posture; 2018 Jun; 63():228-235. PubMed ID: 29775910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Calculating gait kinematics using MR-based kinematic models.
    Scheys L; Desloovere K; Spaepen A; Suetens P; Jonkers I
    Gait Posture; 2011 Feb; 33(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 21247765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ESB Clinical Biomechanics Award 2020: Pelvis and hip movement strategies discriminate typical and pathological femoral growth - Insights gained from a multi-scale mechanobiological modelling framework.
    Kainz H; Killen BA; Van Campenhout A; Desloovere K; Garcia Aznar JM; Shefelbine S; Jonkers I
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2021 Jul; 87():105405. PubMed ID: 34161909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Femoral anteversion assessment: Comparison of physical examination, gait analysis, and EOS biplanar radiography.
    Westberry DE; Wack LI; Davis RB; Hardin JW
    Gait Posture; 2018 May; 62():285-290. PubMed ID: 29605796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Non-rigid deformation to include subject-specific detail in musculoskeletal models of CP children with proximal femoral deformity and its effect on muscle and contact forces during gait.
    Wesseling M; Bosmans L; Van Dijck C; Vander Sloten J; Wirix-Speetjens R; Jonkers I
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2019 Mar; 22(4):376-385. PubMed ID: 30668171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the imitation of CP gait patterns by healthy subjects.
    Rezgui T; Megrot F; Fradet L; Marin F
    Gait Posture; 2013 Sep; 38(4):576-81. PubMed ID: 23499555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanobiological prediction of proximal femoral deformities in children with cerebral palsy.
    Carriero A; Jonkers I; Shefelbine SJ
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2011 Mar; 14(3):253-62. PubMed ID: 20229379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Role of subject-specific musculoskeletal loading on the prediction of bone density distribution in the proximal femur.
    Vahdati A; Walscharts S; Jonkers I; Garcia-Aznar JM; Vander Sloten J; van Lenthe GH
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Feb; 30():244-52. PubMed ID: 24342624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of femoral derotation osteotomy on transverse plane hip and pelvic kinematics in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Carty CP; Walsh HP; Gillett JG; Phillips T; Edwards JM; deLacy M; Boyd RN
    Gait Posture; 2014 Jul; 40(3):333-40. PubMed ID: 24984692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relation between subject-specific hip joint loading, stress distribution in the proximal femur and bone mineral density changes after total hip replacement.
    Jonkers I; Sauwen N; Lenaerts G; Mulier M; Van der Perre G; Jaecques S
    J Biomech; 2008 Dec; 41(16):3405-13. PubMed ID: 19019372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measuring functional outcome after total hip replacement with subject-specific hip joint loading.
    Weber T; Dendorfer S; Dullien S; Grifka J; Verkerke GJ; Renkawitz T
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2012 Dec; 226(12):939-46. PubMed ID: 23636957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.