These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25088752)

  • 1. Nomogram for sample size calculation on a straightforward basis for the kappa statistic.
    Hong H; Choi Y; Hahn S; Park SK; Park BJ
    Ann Epidemiol; 2014 Sep; 24(9):673-80. PubMed ID: 25088752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simple nomograms to calculate sample size in diagnostic studies.
    Carley S; Dosman S; Jones SR; Harrison M
    Emerg Med J; 2005 Mar; 22(3):180-1. PubMed ID: 15735264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adjusted inference procedures for the interobserver agreement in twin studies.
    Dixon SN; Donner A; Shoukri MM
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Aug; 25(4):1260-71. PubMed ID: 23487017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sample size requirements for interval estimation of the kappa statistic for interobserver agreement studies with a binary outcome and multiple raters.
    Donner A; Rotondi MA
    Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(1):Article 31. PubMed ID: 21969984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A general goodness-of-fit approach for inference procedures concerning the kappa statistic.
    Altaye M; Donner A; Eliasziw M
    Stat Med; 2001 Aug; 20(16):2479-88. PubMed ID: 11512137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The disagreeable behaviour of the kappa statistic.
    Flight L; Julious SA
    Pharm Stat; 2015; 14(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 25470361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interval estimation for Cohen's kappa as a measure of agreement.
    Blackman NJ; Koval JJ
    Stat Med; 2000 Mar; 19(5):723-41. PubMed ID: 10700742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A confidence interval approach to sample size estimation for interobserver agreement studies with multiple raters and outcomes.
    Rotondi MA; Donner A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Jul; 65(7):778-84. PubMed ID: 22560852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A goodness-of-fit approach to inference procedures for the kappa statistic: confidence interval construction, significance-testing and sample size estimation.
    Donner A; Eliasziw M
    Stat Med; 1992 Aug; 11(11):1511-9. PubMed ID: 1410963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing agreement with multiple raters on correlated kappa statistics.
    Cao H; Sen PK; Peery AF; Dellon ES
    Biom J; 2016 Jul; 58(4):935-43. PubMed ID: 26890370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sample size calculation through the incorporation of heteroscedasticity and dependence for a penalized t-statistic in microarray experiments.
    Hirakawa A; Hamada C; Yoshimura I
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(2):260-75. PubMed ID: 22251173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sample size calculation for an agreement study.
    Liao JJ
    Pharm Stat; 2010; 9(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 19507134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A simple formula for sample size calculation in equivalence studies.
    Zhang P
    J Biopharm Stat; 2003 Aug; 13(3):529-38. PubMed ID: 12921399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A ratio test in active control non-inferiority trials with a time-to-event endpoint.
    Wang YC; Chen G; Chi GY
    J Biopharm Stat; 2006; 16(2):151-64. PubMed ID: 16584064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sample size for comparing correlated concordance rates.
    Jung SH; Barnhart HX; Sohn I; Stinnett SS; Wallace DK
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(2):359-69. PubMed ID: 18327726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New method to estimate the sample size for calculation of a proportion assuming binomial distribution.
    Vallejo A; Muniesa A; Ferreira C; de Blas I
    Res Vet Sci; 2013 Oct; 95(2):405-9. PubMed ID: 23623739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Statistical inference of risk difference in K correlated 2 x 2 tables with structural zero.
    Wang SF; Tang NS; Zhang B; Wang XR
    Pharm Stat; 2009; 8(4):317-32. PubMed ID: 19152229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A simple nomogram for sample size for estimating sensitivity and specificity of medical tests.
    Malhotra RK; Indrayan A
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2010; 58(6):519-22. PubMed ID: 20952837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sample size calculation for agreement between two raters with binary endpoints using exact tests.
    Shan G
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Jul; 27(7):2132-2141. PubMed ID: 27856958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The kappa statistic in rehabilitation research: an examination.
    Tooth LR; Ottenbacher KJ
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2004 Aug; 85(8):1371-6. PubMed ID: 15295769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.