698 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25088866)
1. Perioperative adverse events after minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
Unger CA; Paraiso MF; Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Ridgeway B
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 211(5):547.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A review of the current status of laparoscopic and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.
Lee RK; Mottrie A; Payne CK; Waltregny D
Eur Urol; 2014 Jun; 65(6):1128-37. PubMed ID: 24433811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative Perioperative Pain and Recovery in Women Undergoing Vaginal Reconstruction Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy.
Westermann LB; Crisp CC; Mazloomdoost D; Kleeman SD; Pauls RN
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 28067743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.
Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perioperative adverse events associated with colpocleisis for uterovaginal and posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse.
Hill AJ; Walters MD; Unger CA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):501.e1-501.e6. PubMed ID: 26529371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
Sajadi KP; Goldman HB
Nat Rev Urol; 2015 Apr; 12(4):216-24. PubMed ID: 25800401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.
Pan K; Cao L; Ryan NA; Wang Y; Xu H
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Jan; 27(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 26179552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcomes of abdominal and minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: a retrospective cohort study.
Nosti PA; Umoh Andy U; Kane S; White DE; Harvie HS; Lowenstein L; Gutman RE
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 24368486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Coolen AWM; Bui BN; Dietz V; Wang R; van Montfoort APA; Mol BWJ; Roovers JWR; Bongers MY
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Dec; 28(12):1767-1783. PubMed ID: 29038834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Short-Term Outcomes of Vaginal Hysterectomy at the Time of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy.
Jones K; Thompson N; Imamoglu G; Solomon E; Rastegar V; Harmanli O
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Jan; 27(1):e223-e226. PubMed ID: 32541298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Different Laparoscopic Sacropexy Procedures for Advanced Uterine Prolapse: A Retrospective Analysis.
Yan L; Lu S; Zhao C; Lei L; Liu L
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2023 Apr; 30(4):300-307. PubMed ID: 36563872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implementation of a new procedure: laparoscopic versus robotic sacrocolpopexy.
Awad N; Mustafa S; Amit A; Deutsch M; Eldor-Itskovitz J; Lowenstein L
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Jun; 287(6):1181-6. PubMed ID: 23274792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Symptomatic and anatomic 1-year outcomes after robotic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
Siddiqui NY; Geller EJ; Visco AG
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 May; 206(5):435.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22397900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Route of hysterectomy during minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy does not affect postoperative outcomes.
Davidson ERW; Thomas TN; Lampert EJ; Paraiso MFR; Ferrando CA
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):649-655. PubMed ID: 30338370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reoperation After Robotic and Vaginal Mesh Reconstructive Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Martin LA; Calixte R; Finamore PS
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2015; 21(6):315-8. PubMed ID: 26506158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes.
Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A randomized trial of vaginal mesh attachment techniques for minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.
Tan-Kim J; Nager CW; Grimes CL; Luber KM; Lukacz ES; Brown HW; Ferrante KL; Dyer KY; Kirby AC; Menefee SA
Int Urogynecol J; 2015 May; 26(5):649-56. PubMed ID: 25421934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Symptom Relief and Retreatment After Vaginal, Open, or Robotic Surgery for Apical Vaginal Prolapse.
Anand M; Weaver AL; Fruth KM; Trabuco EC; Gebhart JB
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(5):297-309. PubMed ID: 28118173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical outcomes and complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with versus without concomitant hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse in Hong Kong Chinese patients after median follow-up of 7 years.
Chan JCY; Yu CH; Go WW
Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):271-278. PubMed ID: 36394632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
