These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

706 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25088866)

  • 1. Perioperative adverse events after minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    Unger CA; Paraiso MF; Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Ridgeway B
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 211(5):547.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A review of the current status of laparoscopic and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Lee RK; Mottrie A; Payne CK; Waltregny D
    Eur Urol; 2014 Jun; 65(6):1128-37. PubMed ID: 24433811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
    Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative Perioperative Pain and Recovery in Women Undergoing Vaginal Reconstruction Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy.
    Westermann LB; Crisp CC; Mazloomdoost D; Kleeman SD; Pauls RN
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 28067743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.
    Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perioperative adverse events associated with colpocleisis for uterovaginal and posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse.
    Hill AJ; Walters MD; Unger CA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):501.e1-501.e6. PubMed ID: 26529371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotic pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
    Sajadi KP; Goldman HB
    Nat Rev Urol; 2015 Apr; 12(4):216-24. PubMed ID: 25800401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Pan K; Cao L; Ryan NA; Wang Y; Xu H
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Jan; 27(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 26179552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcomes of abdominal and minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: a retrospective cohort study.
    Nosti PA; Umoh Andy U; Kane S; White DE; Harvie HS; Lowenstein L; Gutman RE
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 24368486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Coolen AWM; Bui BN; Dietz V; Wang R; van Montfoort APA; Mol BWJ; Roovers JWR; Bongers MY
    Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Dec; 28(12):1767-1783. PubMed ID: 29038834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Short-Term Outcomes of Vaginal Hysterectomy at the Time of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy.
    Jones K; Thompson N; Imamoglu G; Solomon E; Rastegar V; Harmanli O
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Jan; 27(1):e223-e226. PubMed ID: 32541298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Different Laparoscopic Sacropexy Procedures for Advanced Uterine Prolapse: A Retrospective Analysis.
    Yan L; Lu S; Zhao C; Lei L; Liu L
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2023 Apr; 30(4):300-307. PubMed ID: 36563872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implementation of a new procedure: laparoscopic versus robotic sacrocolpopexy.
    Awad N; Mustafa S; Amit A; Deutsch M; Eldor-Itskovitz J; Lowenstein L
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Jun; 287(6):1181-6. PubMed ID: 23274792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Symptomatic and anatomic 1-year outcomes after robotic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    Siddiqui NY; Geller EJ; Visco AG
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 May; 206(5):435.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22397900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Route of hysterectomy during minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy does not affect postoperative outcomes.
    Davidson ERW; Thomas TN; Lampert EJ; Paraiso MFR; Ferrando CA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):649-655. PubMed ID: 30338370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reoperation After Robotic and Vaginal Mesh Reconstructive Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Martin LA; Calixte R; Finamore PS
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2015; 21(6):315-8. PubMed ID: 26506158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes.
    Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A randomized trial of vaginal mesh attachment techniques for minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.
    Tan-Kim J; Nager CW; Grimes CL; Luber KM; Lukacz ES; Brown HW; Ferrante KL; Dyer KY; Kirby AC; Menefee SA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2015 May; 26(5):649-56. PubMed ID: 25421934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Symptom Relief and Retreatment After Vaginal, Open, or Robotic Surgery for Apical Vaginal Prolapse.
    Anand M; Weaver AL; Fruth KM; Trabuco EC; Gebhart JB
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(5):297-309. PubMed ID: 28118173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical outcomes and complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with versus without concomitant hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse in Hong Kong Chinese patients after median follow-up of 7 years.
    Chan JCY; Yu CH; Go WW
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):271-278. PubMed ID: 36394632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 36.