These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25089105)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness of first-line treatments for patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Ewara EM; Zaric GS; Welch S; Sarma S
    Curr Oncol; 2014 Aug; 21(4):e541-50. PubMed ID: 25089105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (mono- or combination chemotherapy), bevacizumab (combination with non-oxaliplatin chemotherapy) and panitumumab (monotherapy) for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer after first-line chemotherapy (review of technology appraisal No.150 and part review of technology appraisal No. 118): a systematic review and economic model.
    Hoyle M; Crathorne L; Peters J; Jones-Hughes T; Cooper C; Napier M; Tappenden P; Hyde C
    Health Technol Assess; 2013 Apr; 17(14):1-237. PubMed ID: 23547747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of First-Line FOLFIRI Combined With Cetuximab or Bevacizumab in Patients With RAS Wild-Type Left-Sided Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
    Han J; Xiao D; Tan C; Zeng X; Hu H; Zeng S; Jiang Q; She L; Yao L; Li L; Tang L; Ma J; Huang J; Shen L
    Cancer Control; 2020; 27(1):1073274820902271. PubMed ID: 32107929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-Effectiveness of First-Line Cetuximab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Saudi Arabia.
    Elsamany S; Elsisi GH; Mohamed Hassanin FA; Saleh K; Tashkandi E
    Value Health Reg Issues; 2022 Mar; 28():67-75. PubMed ID: 34801961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness of FOLFIRI + cetuximab vs FOLFIRI + bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of
    Stintzing S; van Oostrum I; Pescott CP; Ronga P; Heeg B; Heinemann V
    J Med Econ; 2020 May; 23(5):448-455. PubMed ID: 31903807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-Effectiveness of Cetuximab as First-line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the United States.
    Shankaran V; Ortendahl JD; Purdum AG; Bolinder B; Anene AM; Sun GH; Bentley TGK
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2018 Jan; 41(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 26398184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Economic analysis of bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
    Lawrence D; Maschio M; Leahy KJ; Yunger S; Easaw JC; Weinstein MC
    J Med Econ; 2013 Dec; 16(12):1387-98. PubMed ID: 24102083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (review of technology appraisal no. 176) and panitumumab (partial review of technology appraisal no. 240) for previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Huxley N; Crathorne L; Varley-Campbell J; Tikhonova I; Snowsill T; Briscoe S; Peters J; Bond M; Napier M; Hoyle M
    Health Technol Assess; 2017 Jun; 21(38):1-294. PubMed ID: 28682222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Panitumumab Plus FOLFIRI for the Second-Line Treatment of Patients with Wild-Type Ras Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
    Shi Y; Wan X; Tan C; Li J; Peng L
    Adv Ther; 2020 Feb; 37(2):847-859. PubMed ID: 31902066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-minimization analysis of biweekly dosing of cetuximab and FOLFIRI compared with panitumumab and FOLFOX for first-line treatment of patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer in the United States.
    Gathirua-Mwangi WG; Sethi H; Afable MG; Bhattacharyya D; Khan T
    J Med Econ; 2021; 24(1):1164-1172. PubMed ID: 34529522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Economic evaluation study (CHEER-compliant): Cost-effectiveness analysis of RAS screening for treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer based on the CALGB 80405 trial.
    Zhou J; Zhao R; Wen F; Zhang P; Tang R; Chen H; Zhang J; Li Q
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Jul; 95(27):e3762. PubMed ID: 27399059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Economic Analysis of Panitumumab Compared With Cetuximab in Patients With Wild-type KRAS Metastatic Colorectal Cancer That Progressed After Standard Chemotherapy.
    Graham CN; Maglinte GA; Schwartzberg LS; Price TJ; Knox HN; Hechmati G; Hjelmgren J; Barber B; Fakih MG
    Clin Ther; 2016 Jun; 38(6):1376-1391. PubMed ID: 27085587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.
    Heinemann V; von Weikersthal LF; Decker T; Kiani A; Vehling-Kaiser U; Al-Batran SE; Heintges T; Lerchenmüller C; Kahl C; Seipelt G; Kullmann F; Stauch M; Scheithauer W; Hielscher J; Scholz M; Müller S; Link H; Niederle N; Rost A; Höffkes HG; Moehler M; Lindig RU; Modest DP; Rossius L; Kirchner T; Jung A; Stintzing S
    Lancet Oncol; 2014 Sep; 15(10):1065-75. PubMed ID: 25088940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Randomized study of FOLFIRI plus either panitumumab or bevacizumab for wild-type KRAS colorectal cancer-WJOG 6210G.
    Shitara K; Yonesaka K; Denda T; Yamazaki K; Moriwaki T; Tsuda M; Takano T; Okuda H; Nishina T; Sakai K; Nishio K; Tokunaga S; Yamanaka T; Boku N; Hyodo I; Muro K
    Cancer Sci; 2016 Dec; 107(12):1843-1850. PubMed ID: 27712015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A randomized Phase II clinical study of combining panitumumab and bevacizumab, plus irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) compared with FOLFIRI alone as second-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and KRAS mutation.
    Liu Y; Luan L; Wang X
    Onco Targets Ther; 2015; 8():1061-8. PubMed ID: 25999741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-effectiveness of targeted therapy with cetuximab in patients with K-ras wild-type colorectal cancer presenting with initially unresectable metastases limited to the liver in a German setting.
    Asseburg C; Frank M; Köhne CH; Hartmann JT; Griebsch I; Mohr A; Osowski U; Schulten J; Mittendorf T
    Clin Ther; 2011 Apr; 33(4):482-97. PubMed ID: 21635994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-effectiveness analysis of panitumumab plus mFOLFOX6 compared with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Graham CN; Hechmati G; Hjelmgren J; de Liège F; Lanier J; Knox H; Barber B
    Eur J Cancer; 2014 Nov; 50(16):2791-801. PubMed ID: 25219451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer-subgroup analysis of patients with KRAS: mutated tumours in the randomised German AIO study KRK-0306.
    Stintzing S; Fischer von Weikersthal L; Decker T; Vehling-Kaiser U; Jäger E; Heintges T; Stoll C; Giessen C; Modest DP; Neumann J; Jung A; Kirchner T; Scheithauer W; Heinemann V
    Ann Oncol; 2012 Jul; 23(7):1693-9. PubMed ID: 22219013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of panitumumab compared with bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer in the US.
    Graham CN; Christodoulopoulou A; Knox HN; Sabatelli L; Hechmati G; Garawin T; Strickler JH
    J Med Econ; 2018 Nov; 21(11):1075-1083. PubMed ID: 30091652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness of RAS screening before monoclonal antibodies therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer based on FIRE3 Study.
    Wen F; Yang Y; Zhang P; Zhang J; Zhou J; Tang R; Chen H; Zheng H; Fu P; Li Q
    Cancer Biol Ther; 2015; 16(11):1577-84. PubMed ID: 26418570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.