These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25090457)

  • 1. Individually specific call feature is not used to neighbour-stranger discrimination: the corncrake case.
    Budka M; Osiejuk TS
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e104031. PubMed ID: 25090457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are both notes of the common cuckoo's call necessary for familiarity recognition?
    Moskát C; Hauber ME; Bán M; Fülöp A; Geltsch N; Marton A; Elek Z
    Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():685-690. PubMed ID: 29559339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Soft calls and broadcast calls in the corncrake as adaptations to short and long range communication.
    Ręk P
    Behav Processes; 2013 Oct; 99():121-9. PubMed ID: 23876392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Functionally similar acoustic signals in the corncrake (Crex crex) transmit information about different states of the sender during aggressive interactions.
    Ręk P; Osiejuk TS; Budka M
    Horm Behav; 2011 Nov; 60(5):706-12. PubMed ID: 21983228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neighbour-stranger discrimination in an African wood dove inhabiting equatorial rainforest.
    Niśkiewicz M; Szymański P; Zampa L; Budka M; Osiejuk TS
    Sci Rep; 2024 Feb; 14(1):4252. PubMed ID: 38378955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acoustic location of conspecifics in a nocturnal bird: the corncrake
    Ręk P
    Acta Ethol; 2014; 17(1):31-35. PubMed ID: 24563580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A nocturnal rail with a simple territorial call eavesdrops on interactions between rivals.
    Wojas LE; Podkowa PW; Osiejuk TS
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0197368. PubMed ID: 29775465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. No male identity information loss during call propagation through dense vegetation: the case of the corncrake.
    Ręk P; Osiejuk TS
    Behav Processes; 2011 Mar; 86(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 21295119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How to identify dear enemies: the group signature in the complex song of the skylark Alauda arvensis.
    Briefer E; Aubin T; Lehongre K; Rybak F
    J Exp Biol; 2008 Feb; 211(Pt 3):317-26. PubMed ID: 18203986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contact calls in woodpeckers are individually distinctive, show significant sex differences and enable mate recognition.
    Węgrzyn E; Węgrzyn W; Leniowski K
    Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):22769. PubMed ID: 34815426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Principles of the acoustic communication between humans and birds].
    Zvonov BM
    Izv Akad Nauk Ser Biol; 2004; (2):191-9. PubMed ID: 15131982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acoustic preadaptation to transmit vocal individuality of savanna nightjars in noisy urban environments.
    Liang SH; Walther BA; Jen CH; Chen CC; Chen YC; Shieh BS
    Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):18159. PubMed ID: 33097822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acoustic features involved in the neighbour-stranger vocal recognition process in male Australian fur seals.
    Tripovich JS; Charrier I; Rogers TL; Canfield R; Arnould JP
    Behav Processes; 2008 Sep; 79(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 18571339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Response to displaced neighbours in a territorial songbird with a large repertoire.
    Briefer E; Aubin T; Rybak F
    Naturwissenschaften; 2009 Sep; 96(9):1067-77. PubMed ID: 19495716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peafowl antipredator calls encode information about signalers.
    Yorzinski JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Feb; 135(2):942-52. PubMed ID: 25234902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Advertisement-call preferences in diploid-tetraploid treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis and Hyla versicolor): implications for mate choice and the evolution of communication systems.
    Gerhardt HC
    Evolution; 2005 Feb; 59(2):395-408. PubMed ID: 15807424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individual voice recognition in a territorial frog (Rana catesbeiana).
    Bee MA; Gerhardt HC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Jul; 269(1499):1443-8. PubMed ID: 12137573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Production and perception of sex differences in vocalizations of Wied's black-tufted-ear marmosets (Callithrix kuhlii).
    Smith AS; Birnie AK; Lane KR; French JA
    Am J Primatol; 2009 Apr; 71(4):324-32. PubMed ID: 19090554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mate vocal recognition in the Scopoli's shearwater Calonectris diomedea: do females and males share the same acoustic code?
    Curé C; Mathevon N; Aubin T
    Behav Processes; 2016 Jul; 128():96-102. PubMed ID: 27126987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Localisation of an acoustic signal in a noisy environment: the display call of the king penguin Aptenodytes patagonicus.
    Aubin T; Jouventin P
    J Exp Biol; 2002 Dec; 205(Pt 24):3793-8. PubMed ID: 12432003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.