These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

443 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25091104)

  • 1. Circulatory support for shock complicating myocardial infarction.
    Acharya D; Loyaga-Rendon RY; Tallaj JA; Pamboukian SV; Sasse MF
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2014 Aug; 26(8):E109-14. PubMed ID: 25091104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcomes of Hemodynamic Support With Impella for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock at a Rural Community Hospital Without On-Site Surgical Back-up.
    Wilkins CE; Herrera TL; Nagahiro MK; Weathers LB; Girotra SV; Sandhu F
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2019 Feb; 31(2):E23-E29. PubMed ID: 30700627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative.
    Basir MB; Schreiber T; Dixon S; Alaswad K; Patel K; Almany S; Khandelwal A; Hanson I; George A; Ashbrook M; Blank N; Abdelsalam M; Sareen N; Timmis SBH; O'Neill Md WW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(3):454-461. PubMed ID: 29266676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. First experience with implantation of a percutaneous right ventricular Impella right side percutaneous support device as a bridge to recovery in acute right ventricular infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock in the United States.
    Margey R; Chamakura S; Siddiqi S; Senapathi M; Schilling J; Fram D; Hirst J; Saddiq I; Silverman D; Kiernan F
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jun; 6(3):e37-8. PubMed ID: 23780299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction.
    Ouweneel DM; Eriksen E; Sjauw KD; van Dongen IM; Hirsch A; Packer EJ; Vis MM; Wykrzykowska JJ; Koch KT; Baan J; de Winter RJ; Piek JJ; Lagrand WK; de Mol BA; Tijssen JG; Henriques JP
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 69(3):278-287. PubMed ID: 27810347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early Impella Support in Postcardiac Arrest Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction Improves Short- and Long-Term Survival.
    Chatzis G; Markus B; Luesebrink U; Ahrens H; Divchev D; Syntila S; Scheele N; Al Eryani H; Tousoulis D; Schieffer B; Karatolios K
    Crit Care Med; 2021 Jun; 49(6):943-955. PubMed ID: 33729726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cardiogenic shock secondary to severe acute ischemic mitral regurgitation managed with an Impella 2.5 percutaneous left ventricular assist device.
    Harmon L; Boccalandro F
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Jun; 79(7):1129-34. PubMed ID: 21805597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Management of cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction: an update 2019.
    Thiele H; Ohman EM; de Waha-Thiele S; Zeymer U; Desch S
    Eur Heart J; 2019 Aug; 40(32):2671-2683. PubMed ID: 31274157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Important role of mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
    Truby L; Naka Y; Kalesan B; Ota T; Kirtane AJ; Kodali S; Nikic N; Mundy L; Colombo P; Jorde UP; Takayama H
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2015 Aug; 48(2):322-8. PubMed ID: 25480935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Temporary percutaneous ventricular assist devices for cardiogenic shock and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic literature review].
    Negro A; Pecoraro V; Camerlingo MD; Maltoni S
    G Ital Cardiol (Rome); 2020 Feb; 21(2):128-137. PubMed ID: 32051636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock from acute myocardial infarction: Impella CP/5.0 versus ECMO.
    Karami M; den Uil CA; Ouweneel DM; Scholte NT; Engström AE; Akin S; Lagrand WK; Vlaar AP; Jewbali LS; Henriques JP
    Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2020 Mar; 9(2):164-172. PubMed ID: 31353918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Right infarction response to coronary artery bypass and the Abiomed BVS 5000.
    Hisata Y; Hashizume K; Tanigawa K; Miura T; Odate T; Eishi K
    Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2014 Mar; 22(3):329-31. PubMed ID: 24585910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transradial versus transfemoral coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: is transradial coronary intervention suitable for emergency PCI in high-risk acute myocardial infarction?
    Iga A; Wagatsuma K; Yamazaki J; Ikeda T
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2014 May; 26(5):196-202. PubMed ID: 24791717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: pharmacologic and mechanical hemodynamic support pathways.
    Graf T; Desch S; Eitel I; Thiele H
    Coron Artery Dis; 2015 Sep; 26(6):535-44. PubMed ID: 25968304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bail-Out Use of Impella CP as a Bridge to TAVI in a Cardiogenic Shock Patient: The "Pump-Rewiring" Technique.
    Burzotta F; Nerla R; Trani C
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2016 Jan; 28(1):E1-5. PubMed ID: 26716594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanical versus pharmacologic support for cardiogenic shock.
    Dhar G; Jolly N
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Mar; 75(4):626-9. PubMed ID: 20049971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Circulatory Support with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and/or Impella for Cardiogenic Shock During Myocardial Infarction.
    Mourad M; Gaudard P; De La Arena P; Eliet J; Zeroual N; Rouvière P; Roubille F; Albat B; Colson PH
    ASAIO J; 2018; 64(6):708-714. PubMed ID: 29240628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Percutaneous cardiac assist devices compared with surgical hemodynamic support alternatives: cost-effectiveness in the emergent setting.
    Maini B; Gregory D; Scotti DJ; Buyantseva L
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May; 83(6):E183-92. PubMed ID: 24130115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of acute circulatory support in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
    Esposito M; Bader Y; Pedicini R; Breton C; Mullin A; Kapur NK
    Indian Heart J; 2017; 69(5):668-674. PubMed ID: 29054200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Women With Cardiogenic Shock Derive Greater Benefit From Early Mechanical Circulatory Support: An Update From the cVAD Registry.
    Joseph SM; Brisco MA; Colvin M; Grady KL; Walsh MN; Cook JL;
    J Interv Cardiol; 2016 Jun; 29(3):248-56. PubMed ID: 27229327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.