388 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25091650)
1. [Economic assessment of the routine use of Oncotype DX® assay for early breast cancer in Franche-Comte region].
Nerich V; Curtit E; Bazan F; Montcuquet P; Villanueva C; Chaigneau L; Cals L; Méneveau N; Dobi E; Altmotlak H; Algros MP; Choulot MJ; Nallet G; Limat S; Mansion S; Pivot X
Bull Cancer; 2014; 101(7-8):681-9. PubMed ID: 25091650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of Oncotype DX breast Recurrence Score testing on adjuvant chemotherapy use in early breast cancer: Real world experience in Greater Manchester, UK.
Loncaster J; Armstrong A; Howell S; Wilson G; Welch R; Chittalia A; Valentine WJ; Bundred NJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 May; 43(5):931-937. PubMed ID: 28111076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Results of PONDx, a prospective multicenter study of the Oncotype DX
Curtit E; Vannetzel JM; Darmon JC; Roche S; Bourgeois H; Dewas S; Catala S; Mereb E; Fanget CF; Genet D; Forest AM; Bernier C; Pivot X
Breast; 2019 Apr; 44():39-45. PubMed ID: 30634106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Oncotype DX
Rath MG; Uhlmann L; Fiedler M; Heil J; Golatta M; Dinkic C; Hennigs A; Schott S; Ernst V; Koch T; Sohn C; Brucker C; Rom J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Feb; 297(2):443-447. PubMed ID: 29236174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A decision impact, decision conflict and economic assessment of routine Oncotype DX testing of 146 women with node-negative or pNImi, ER-positive breast cancer in the U.K.
Holt S; Bertelli G; Humphreys I; Valentine W; Durrani S; Pudney D; Rolles M; Moe M; Khawaja S; Sharaiha Y; Brinkworth E; Whelan S; Jones S; Bennett H; Phillips CJ
Br J Cancer; 2013 Jun; 108(11):2250-8. PubMed ID: 23695023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Economic Impact of Gene Expression Profiling in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer in France.
Katz G; Romano O; Foa C; Vataire AL; Chantelard JV; Hervé R; Barletta H; Durieux A; Martin JP; Salmon R
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0128880. PubMed ID: 26086912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using the 21-gene assay to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decision-making in early-stage breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness evaluation in the German setting.
Blohmer JU; Rezai M; Kümmel S; Kühn T; Warm M; Friedrichs K; Benkow A; Valentine WJ; Eiermann W
J Med Econ; 2013; 16(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 22966753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical experience of using Oncotype DX as an additional treatment decision tool in early breast cancer - a retrospective analysis from 5 Greek institutions.
Markopoulos C; Xepapadakis G; Venizelos V; Tsiftsoglou A; Misitzis J; Panoussis D; Antonopoulou Z; Stathoulopoulou M; Zobolas V; Gogas H
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2012 May; 38(5):413-9. PubMed ID: 22425282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of Oncotype DX on treatment decisions in ER-positive, node-negative breast cancer with histologic correlation.
Biroschak JR; Schwartz GF; Palazzo JP; Toll AD; Brill KL; Jaslow RJ; Lee SY
Breast J; 2013; 19(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 23614365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of Oncotype DX® recurrence score of paraffin-embedded core biopsy tissues in predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with breast cancer.
Soran A; Bhargava R; Johnson R; Ahrendt G; Bonaventura M; Diego E; McAuliffe PF; Serrano M; Menekse E; Sezgin E; McGuire KP
Breast Dis; 2016 Jul; 36(2-3):65-71. PubMed ID: 27662272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic and predictive indicators in early-stage breast cancer and the role of genomic profiling: Focus on the Oncotype DX
Curtit E; Mansi L; Maisonnette-Escot Y; Sautière JL; Pivot X
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 May; 43(5):921-930. PubMed ID: 28087099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors influencing Oncotype DX use in the management of early breast cancer: a single centre experience.
Zhu X; Dent S; Paquet L; Zhang T; Graham N; Song X
Eur J Cancer; 2014 Oct; 50(15):2544-9. PubMed ID: 25129366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A cost-consequence model of using the 21-gene assay to identify patients with early-stage node-positive breast cancer who benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in the Netherlands.
Simons MJHG; Machielsen PM; Spoorendonk JA; Ignacio T; Drost PB; Jacobs T; de Jongh FE
J Med Econ; 2024; 27(1):445-454. PubMed ID: 38436289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Economic evaluation of genomic test-directed chemotherapy for early-stage lymph node-positive breast cancer.
Hall PS; McCabe C; Stein RC; Cameron D
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2012 Jan; 104(1):56-66. PubMed ID: 22138097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of Genomic Assay Testing and Clinical Factors on Chemotherapy Use After Implementation of Standardized Testing Criteria.
Natsuhara KH; Losk K; King TA; Lin NU; Camuso K; Golshan M; Pochebit S; Brock JE; Bunnell CA; Freedman RA
Oncologist; 2019 May; 24(5):595-602. PubMed ID: 30076279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of the 21-gene Recurrence Score assay on clinical decision-making in node-positive (up to 3 positive nodes) estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients.
Stemmer SM; Klang SH; Ben-Baruch N; Geffen DB; Steiner M; Soussan-Gutman L; Merling S; Svedman C; Rizel S; Lieberman N
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2013 Jul; 140(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 23801158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Economic implications of 21-gene breast cancer risk assay from the perspective of an Israeli-managed health-care organization.
Klang SH; Hammerman A; Liebermann N; Efrat N; Doberne J; Hornberger J
Value Health; 2010; 13(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 20412544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Impact of the 21-gene assay in decision-making during multidisciplinary breast meeting: A French experience].
Dreyfus C; Ballester M; Gligorov J; Agranat P; Antoine M; Tengher I; Bricou A
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2015 Dec; 43(12):780-5. PubMed ID: 26584893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tumour profiling tests to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in early breast cancer: a systematic review and economic analysis.
Harnan S; Tappenden P; Cooper K; Stevens J; Bessey A; Rafia R; Ward S; Wong R; Stein RC; Brown J
Health Technol Assess; 2019 Jun; 23(30):1-328. PubMed ID: 31264581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The 21-gene Recurrence Score® assay predicts distant recurrence in lymph node-positive, hormone receptor-positive, breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant sequential epirubicin- and docetaxel-based or epirubicin-based chemotherapy (PACS-01 trial).
Penault-Llorca F; Filleron T; Asselain B; Baehner FL; Fumoleau P; Lacroix-Triki M; Anderson JM; Yoshizawa C; Cherbavaz DB; Shak S; Roca L; Sagan C; Lemonnier J; Martin AL; Roché H
BMC Cancer; 2018 May; 18(1):526. PubMed ID: 29728098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
