These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

385 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25091650)

  • 1. [Economic assessment of the routine use of Oncotype DX® assay for early breast cancer in Franche-Comte region].
    Nerich V; Curtit E; Bazan F; Montcuquet P; Villanueva C; Chaigneau L; Cals L; Méneveau N; Dobi E; Altmotlak H; Algros MP; Choulot MJ; Nallet G; Limat S; Mansion S; Pivot X
    Bull Cancer; 2014; 101(7-8):681-9. PubMed ID: 25091650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of Oncotype DX breast Recurrence Score testing on adjuvant chemotherapy use in early breast cancer: Real world experience in Greater Manchester, UK.
    Loncaster J; Armstrong A; Howell S; Wilson G; Welch R; Chittalia A; Valentine WJ; Bundred NJ
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 May; 43(5):931-937. PubMed ID: 28111076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Results of PONDx, a prospective multicenter study of the Oncotype DX
    Curtit E; Vannetzel JM; Darmon JC; Roche S; Bourgeois H; Dewas S; Catala S; Mereb E; Fanget CF; Genet D; Forest AM; Bernier C; Pivot X
    Breast; 2019 Apr; 44():39-45. PubMed ID: 30634106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Oncotype DX
    Rath MG; Uhlmann L; Fiedler M; Heil J; Golatta M; Dinkic C; Hennigs A; Schott S; Ernst V; Koch T; Sohn C; Brucker C; Rom J
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Feb; 297(2):443-447. PubMed ID: 29236174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A decision impact, decision conflict and economic assessment of routine Oncotype DX testing of 146 women with node-negative or pNImi, ER-positive breast cancer in the U.K.
    Holt S; Bertelli G; Humphreys I; Valentine W; Durrani S; Pudney D; Rolles M; Moe M; Khawaja S; Sharaiha Y; Brinkworth E; Whelan S; Jones S; Bennett H; Phillips CJ
    Br J Cancer; 2013 Jun; 108(11):2250-8. PubMed ID: 23695023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Economic Impact of Gene Expression Profiling in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer in France.
    Katz G; Romano O; Foa C; Vataire AL; Chantelard JV; Hervé R; Barletta H; Durieux A; Martin JP; Salmon R
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0128880. PubMed ID: 26086912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using the 21-gene assay to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decision-making in early-stage breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness evaluation in the German setting.
    Blohmer JU; Rezai M; Kümmel S; Kühn T; Warm M; Friedrichs K; Benkow A; Valentine WJ; Eiermann W
    J Med Econ; 2013; 16(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 22966753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical experience of using Oncotype DX as an additional treatment decision tool in early breast cancer - a retrospective analysis from 5 Greek institutions.
    Markopoulos C; Xepapadakis G; Venizelos V; Tsiftsoglou A; Misitzis J; Panoussis D; Antonopoulou Z; Stathoulopoulou M; Zobolas V; Gogas H
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2012 May; 38(5):413-9. PubMed ID: 22425282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of Oncotype DX on treatment decisions in ER-positive, node-negative breast cancer with histologic correlation.
    Biroschak JR; Schwartz GF; Palazzo JP; Toll AD; Brill KL; Jaslow RJ; Lee SY
    Breast J; 2013; 19(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 23614365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of Oncotype DX® recurrence score of paraffin-embedded core biopsy tissues in predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with breast cancer.
    Soran A; Bhargava R; Johnson R; Ahrendt G; Bonaventura M; Diego E; McAuliffe PF; Serrano M; Menekse E; Sezgin E; McGuire KP
    Breast Dis; 2016 Jul; 36(2-3):65-71. PubMed ID: 27662272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prognostic and predictive indicators in early-stage breast cancer and the role of genomic profiling: Focus on the Oncotype DX
    Curtit E; Mansi L; Maisonnette-Escot Y; Sautière JL; Pivot X
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 May; 43(5):921-930. PubMed ID: 28087099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors influencing Oncotype DX use in the management of early breast cancer: a single centre experience.
    Zhu X; Dent S; Paquet L; Zhang T; Graham N; Song X
    Eur J Cancer; 2014 Oct; 50(15):2544-9. PubMed ID: 25129366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A cost-consequence model of using the 21-gene assay to identify patients with early-stage node-positive breast cancer who benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in the Netherlands.
    Simons MJHG; Machielsen PM; Spoorendonk JA; Ignacio T; Drost PB; Jacobs T; de Jongh FE
    J Med Econ; 2024; 27(1):445-454. PubMed ID: 38436289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Economic evaluation of genomic test-directed chemotherapy for early-stage lymph node-positive breast cancer.
    Hall PS; McCabe C; Stein RC; Cameron D
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2012 Jan; 104(1):56-66. PubMed ID: 22138097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of the 21-gene Recurrence Score assay on clinical decision-making in node-positive (up to 3 positive nodes) estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients.
    Stemmer SM; Klang SH; Ben-Baruch N; Geffen DB; Steiner M; Soussan-Gutman L; Merling S; Svedman C; Rizel S; Lieberman N
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2013 Jul; 140(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 23801158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Economic implications of 21-gene breast cancer risk assay from the perspective of an Israeli-managed health-care organization.
    Klang SH; Hammerman A; Liebermann N; Efrat N; Doberne J; Hornberger J
    Value Health; 2010; 13(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 20412544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Impact of the 21-gene assay in decision-making during multidisciplinary breast meeting: A French experience].
    Dreyfus C; Ballester M; Gligorov J; Agranat P; Antoine M; Tengher I; Bricou A
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2015 Dec; 43(12):780-5. PubMed ID: 26584893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tumour profiling tests to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in early breast cancer: a systematic review and economic analysis.
    Harnan S; Tappenden P; Cooper K; Stevens J; Bessey A; Rafia R; Ward S; Wong R; Stein RC; Brown J
    Health Technol Assess; 2019 Jun; 23(30):1-328. PubMed ID: 31264581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The 21-gene Recurrence Score® assay predicts distant recurrence in lymph node-positive, hormone receptor-positive, breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant sequential epirubicin- and docetaxel-based or epirubicin-based chemotherapy (PACS-01 trial).
    Penault-Llorca F; Filleron T; Asselain B; Baehner FL; Fumoleau P; Lacroix-Triki M; Anderson JM; Yoshizawa C; Cherbavaz DB; Shak S; Roca L; Sagan C; Lemonnier J; Martin AL; Roché H
    BMC Cancer; 2018 May; 18(1):526. PubMed ID: 29728098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of Genomic Assay Testing and Clinical Factors on Chemotherapy Use After Implementation of Standardized Testing Criteria.
    Natsuhara KH; Losk K; King TA; Lin NU; Camuso K; Golshan M; Pochebit S; Brock JE; Bunnell CA; Freedman RA
    Oncologist; 2019 May; 24(5):595-602. PubMed ID: 30076279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.