289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25091827)
21. Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound for assessing parametrial infiltration in cervical cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Alcazar JL; García E; Machuca M; Quintana R; Escrig J; Chacón E; Mínguez JA; Chiva L
Med Ultrason; 2020 Mar; 22(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 32096793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Invasive carcinoma of the cervix uteri (Stage IB-IIB). Comparison of CT and MR for the assessment of the parametrium].
Sironi S; Zanello A; Rodighiero MG; Vanzulli A; Taccagni GL; Belloni C; Del Maschio A
Radiol Med; 1991 May; 81(5):671-7. PubMed ID: 2057595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [The diagnostic value of rectal ultrasound in the assessment of parametrial infiltration of cervix cancer].
Gitsch G; Deutinger J; Bernaschek G
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1992 Jul; 52(7):412-4. PubMed ID: 1499951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of parametrial infiltration in cervical cancer with voxel-based segmentation of integrated
Wang T; Sun H; Han F; Sun W; Chen Z
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Sep; 118():147-152. PubMed ID: 31439234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Parametrial tumor spreading patterns in cervix cancer patients treated by radical hysterectomy.
Yen MS; Yuan CC; Wang PH; Ng HT; Twu NF; Juang CM
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2003 Feb; 80(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 12566187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Assessment of parametrial invasion of cervical carcinoma, the role of T2-weighted MRI and diffusion weighted imaging with or without fusion.
Mongula JE; Bakers FCH; Mihl C; van Gorp T; Kruitwagen RFPM; Slangen BFM
Clin Radiol; 2019 Oct; 74(10):790-796. PubMed ID: 31383355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Value of fine needle aspiration biopsy in cervical cancer].
Cendrowski K; Sawicki W; Wygledowski J; Spiewankiewicz B; Stelmachów J
Ginekol Pol; 2003 Sep; 74(9):683-8. PubMed ID: 14674108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. MRI and Ultrasound Fusion Imaging for Cervical Cancer.
Théodore C; Levaillant JM; Capmas P; Chabi N; Skalli D; Vienet-Legué L; Haddad B; Fernandez H; Touboul C
Anticancer Res; 2017 Sep; 37(9):5079-5085. PubMed ID: 28870937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Early cervical carcinoma: the natural history of lymph node involvement redefined on the basis of thorough parametrectomy and giant section study.
Benedetti-Panici P; Maneschi F; D'Andrea G; Cutillo G; Rabitti C; Congiu M; Coronetta F; Capelli A
Cancer; 2000 May; 88(10):2267-74. PubMed ID: 10820348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cervical carcinoma with full-thickness stromal invasion: efficacy of dynamic MR imaging in the assessment of parametrial involvement.
Iwata S; Joja I; Okuno K; Miyagi Y; Sakaguchi Y; Kudo T; Hiraki Y
Radiat Med; 2002; 20(5):247-55. PubMed ID: 12450104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Pretreatment staging of cervical cancer: is imaging better than palpation?: Role of CT and MRI in preoperative staging of cervical cancer: single institution results for 255 patients.
Hancke K; Heilmann V; Straka P; Kreienberg R; Kurzeder C
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2856-61. PubMed ID: 18696156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography vs MRI for evaluation of local invasion by cervical cancer.
Zheng W; Chen K; Peng C; Yin SH; Pan YY; Liu M; Lin SY; Pei XQ
Br J Radiol; 2018 Nov; 91(1091):20170858. PubMed ID: 30028181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of extension in uterine cervical cancer cases with special attention to imaging planes].
Goto M; Okamura S; Ueki M; Sugimoto O
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Dec; 42(12):1627-33. PubMed ID: 2277202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Transperineal and endovaginal ultrasound for evaluating suburethral masses: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.
Okeahialam NA; Taithongchai A; Sultan AH; Thakar R
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 57(6):999-1005. PubMed ID: 32936990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Three-dimensional transvaginal tomographic ultrasound imaging for cervical cancer staging.
Han XS; Ning CP; Sun LT; Li XY; Peng YQ; Dang MZ
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Sep; 41(9):2303-9. PubMed ID: 26070421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Carcinoma of the cervix: value of MR imaging in detecting parametrial involvement.
Sironi S; Belloni C; Taccagni GL; DelMaschio A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Apr; 156(4):753-6. PubMed ID: 2003441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Endometrial cancer off-line staging using two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound and three-dimensional volume contrast imaging: Intermethod agreement, interrater reliability and diagnostic accuracy.
Green RW; Valentin L; Alcazar JL; Chiappa V; Erdodi B; Franchi D; Frühauf F; Fruscio R; Guerriero S; Graupera B; Jakab A; di Legge A; Ludovisi M; Mascilini F; Pascual MA; van den Bosch T; Epstein E
Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Sep; 150(3):438-445. PubMed ID: 30029961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinical stage I carcinoma of the cervix. Value of MR imaging in determining invasion into the parametrium.
Lien HH; Blomlie V; Iversen T; Tropé C; Sundfør K; Abeler VM
Acta Radiol; 1993 Mar; 34(2):130-2. PubMed ID: 8452717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. MRI anatomy of parametrial extension to better identify local pathways of disease spread in cervical cancer.
Valentini AL; Gui B; Miccò M; Giuliani M; Rodolfino E; Ninivaggi V; Iacobucci M; Marino M; Gambacorta MA; Testa AC; Zannoni GF; Bonomo L
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2016; 22(4):319-25. PubMed ID: 27165471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Three-dimensional turbo spin-echo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and semiquantitative assessment of knee osteoarthritis: comparison with two-dimensional routine MRI.
Crema MD; Nogueira-Barbosa MH; Roemer FW; Marra MD; Niu J; Chagas-Neto FA; Gregio-Junior E; Guermazi A
Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2013 Mar; 21(3):428-33. PubMed ID: 23274102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
