These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25092389)

  • 1. Behavioral and electrophysiological investigation of semantic and response conflict in the Stroop task.
    Augustinova M; Silvert L; Ferrand L; Llorca PM; Flaudias V
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Apr; 22(2):543-9. PubMed ID: 25092389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reward expectation modulates multiple stages of auditory conflict control.
    Kang G; Chang W; Wang L; Zhou X
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Dec; 146():148-156. PubMed ID: 31648025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Further investigation of distinct components of Stroop interference and of their reduction by short response-stimulus intervals.
    Augustinova M; Silvert L; Spatola N; Ferrand L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():54-62. PubMed ID: 28407872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Some further clarifications on age-related differences in the Stroop task: New evidence from the two-to-one Stroop paradigm.
    Burca M; Chausse P; Ferrand L; Parris BA; Augustinova M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Apr; 29(2):492-500. PubMed ID: 34595729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neural correlates of stimulus and response interference in a 2-1 mapping stroop task.
    Chen A; Bailey K; Tiernan BN; West R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 May; 80(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 21356252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Event-related potentials and oscillatory brain responses associated with semantic and Stroop-like interference effects in overt naming.
    Piai V; Roelofs A; van der Meij R
    Brain Res; 2012 Apr; 1450():87-101. PubMed ID: 22424790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrophysiological explorations of the bilingual advantage: evidence from a Stroop task.
    Coderre EL; van Heuven WJ
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e103424. PubMed ID: 25068723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Event-related potentials with the Stroop colour-word task: timing of semantic conflict.
    Zurrón M; Pouso M; Lindín M; Galdo S; Díaz F
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Jun; 72(3):246-52. PubMed ID: 19171167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing stimulus-stimulus (semantic) conflict in the Stroop task using saccadic two-to-one color response mapping and preresponse pupillary measures.
    Hasshim N; Parris BA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Nov; 77(8):2601-10. PubMed ID: 26272367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modulation of conflicts in the Stroop effect.
    Shichel I; Tzelgov J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():93-102. PubMed ID: 29078981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Priming and backward influences in the human brain: processing interactions during the stroop interference effect.
    Appelbaum LG; Meyerhoff KL; Woldorff MG
    Cereb Cortex; 2009 Nov; 19(11):2508-21. PubMed ID: 19321654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporary inhibitory tagging at previously attended locations: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Zhang Y; Zhou X; Zhang M
    Psychophysiology; 2012 Sep; 49(9):1191-9. PubMed ID: 22882160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Stroop matching task presents conflict at both the response and nonresponse levels: an event-related potential and electromyography study.
    Caldas AL; Machado-Pinheiro W; Souza LB; Motta-Ribeiro GC; David IA
    Psychophysiology; 2012 Sep; 49(9):1215-24. PubMed ID: 22748126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Some further clarifications on age-related differences in Stroop interference.
    Augustinova M; Clarys D; Spatola N; Ferrand L
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Apr; 25(2):767-774. PubMed ID: 29372512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sequential conflict resolution under multiple concurrent conflicts: An ERP study.
    Rey-Mermet A; Gade M; Steinhauser M
    Neuroimage; 2019 Mar; 188():411-418. PubMed ID: 30562575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When some triggers a scalar inference out of the blue. An electrophysiological study of a Stroop-like conflict elicited by single words.
    Barbet C; Thierry G
    Cognition; 2018 Aug; 177():58-68. PubMed ID: 29653397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neural cascade of conflict processing: Not just time-on-task.
    McKay CC; van den Berg B; Woldorff MG
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Feb; 96():184-191. PubMed ID: 28017818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Utilization of reward-prospect enhances preparatory attention and reduces stimulus conflict.
    van den Berg B; Krebs RM; Lorist MM; Woldorff MG
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2014 Jun; 14(2):561-77. PubMed ID: 24820263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dissociated stimulus and response conflict effect in the Stroop task: evidence from evoked brain potentials and brain oscillations.
    Zhao J; Liang WK; Juan CH; Wang L; Wang S; Zhu Z
    Biol Psychol; 2015 Jan; 104():130-8. PubMed ID: 25511611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Age differences in task switching and response monitoring: evidence from ERPs.
    Eppinger B; Kray J; Mecklinger A; John O
    Biol Psychol; 2007 Apr; 75(1):52-67. PubMed ID: 17250949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.