These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. Sensitivity of tibio-menisco-femoral joint contact behavior to variations in knee kinematics. Yao J; Salo AD; Lee J; Lerner AL J Biomech; 2008; 41(2):390-8. PubMed ID: 17950743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Definition and evaluation of testing scenarios for knee wear simulation under conditions of highly demanding daily activities. Schwiesau J; Schilling C; Kaddick C; Utzschneider S; Jansson V; Fritz B; Blömer W; Grupp TM Med Eng Phys; 2013 May; 35(5):591-600. PubMed ID: 22922096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Influence of Component Alignment and Ligament Properties on Tibiofemoral Contact Forces in Total Knee Replacement. Smith CR; Vignos MF; Lenhart RL; Kaiser J; Thelen DG J Biomech Eng; 2016 Feb; 138(2):021017. PubMed ID: 26769446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contribution of geometric design parameters to knee implant performance: Conflicting impact of conformity on kinematics and contact mechanics. Ardestani MM; Moazen M; Jin Z Knee; 2015 Jun; 22(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 25795548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Posterior stabilized versus cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty designs: conformity affects the performance reliability of the design over the patient population. Ardestani MM; Moazen M; Maniei E; Jin Z Med Eng Phys; 2015 Apr; 37(4):350-60. PubMed ID: 25703743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Kinematic behavior of a customized surface-guided knee implant during simulated knee-bending. Pejhan S; Bohm E; Brandt JM; Gascoyne T; Wyss U Med Eng Phys; 2017 Oct; 48():168-175. PubMed ID: 28690046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of geometric design variables on the kinematic performance of a surface-guided total knee replacement. Pejhan S; Bohm E; Brandt JM; Wyss U J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2017; 25(3):2309499017727922. PubMed ID: 28914139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Coupled motions under compressive load in intact and ACL-deficient knees: a cadaveric study. Liu-Barba D; Hull ML; Howell SM J Biomech Eng; 2007 Dec; 129(6):818-24. PubMed ID: 18067385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anterior referencing of tibial slope in total knee arthroplasty considerably influences knee kinematics: a musculoskeletal simulation study. Marra MA; Strzelczak M; Heesterbeek PJC; van de Groes SAW; Janssen DW; Koopman BFJM; Wymenga AB; Verdonschot NJJ Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 May; 26(5):1540-1548. PubMed ID: 28500391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of tibial bearing curvatures of a customised total knee implant on squatting motion and loads. Wang L; Wang CJ Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2021 Jan; 24(1):43-55. PubMed ID: 32840135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Knee joint kinematics, fixation and function related to joint area design in total knee arthroplasty. Uvehammer J Acta Orthop Scand Suppl; 2001 Feb; 72(299):1-52. PubMed ID: 11381581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of patient, surgical, and implant design variation in total knee replacement performance. Fitzpatrick CK; Clary CW; Rullkoetter PJ J Biomech; 2012 Aug; 45(12):2092-102. PubMed ID: 22727219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]