These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25092948)
1. Sequential Tests of Multiple Hypotheses Controlling Type I and II Familywise Error Rates. Bartroff J; Song J J Stat Plan Inference; 2014 Oct; 153():100-114. PubMed ID: 25092948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A less conservative method to adjust for familywise error rate in neuropsychological research: the Holm's sequential Bonferroni procedure. Eichstaedt KE; Kovatch K; Maroof DA NeuroRehabilitation; 2013; 32(3):693-6. PubMed ID: 23648625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sequential Tests of Multiple Hypotheses Controlling False Discovery and Nondiscovery Rates. Bartroff J; Song J Seq Anal; 2020; 39(1):65-91. PubMed ID: 33776197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Rejection Principle for Sequential Tests of Multiple Hypotheses Controlling Familywise Error Rates. Bartroff J; Song J Scand Stat Theory Appl; 2016 Mar; 31(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 26985125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Group sequential Holm and Hochberg procedures. Tamhane AC; Xi D; Gou J Stat Med; 2021 Oct; 40(24):5333-5350. PubMed ID: 34636081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On generalized fixed sequence procedures for controlling the FWER. Qiu Z; Guo W; Lynch G Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(30):3968-83. PubMed ID: 26228241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The fallback procedure for evaluating a single family of hypotheses. Wiens BL; Dmitrienko A J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(6):929-42. PubMed ID: 16279352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Note on a stepwise procedure for rejecting at least k out of m hypotheses: A simple Holm-type formulation and proof. Guilbaud OJM Biom J; 2022 Feb; 64(2):377-383. PubMed ID: 34174123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sample size determination with familywise control of both type I and type II errors in clinical trials. Wang B; Ting N J Biopharm Stat; 2016; 26(5):951-65. PubMed ID: 26881972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simultaneous confidence regions corresponding to Holm's step-down procedure and other closed-testing procedures. Guilbaud O Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):678-92. PubMed ID: 18932131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiple testing. Part I. Single-step procedures for control of general type I error rates. Dudoit S; van der Laan MJ; Pollard KS Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2004; 3():Article13. PubMed ID: 16646791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improved two-stage group sequential procedures for testing a secondary endpoint after the primary endpoint achieves significance. Li H; Wang J; Luo X; Grechko J; Jennison C Biom J; 2018 Sep; 60(5):893-902. PubMed ID: 29876964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An efficient Monte Carlo approach to assessing statistical significance in genomic studies. Lin DY Bioinformatics; 2005 Mar; 21(6):781-7. PubMed ID: 15454414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Familywise error for multiple time-to-event endpoints in a group sequential design. Thomsen HF; Lausvig NL; Pipper CB; Andersen S; Damgaard LH; Emerson SS; Ravn H Stat Med; 2024 Aug; 43(18):3417-3431. PubMed ID: 38852994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. SOME STEP-DOWN PROCEDURES CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE UNDER DEPENDENCE. Ge Y; Sealfon SC; Speed TP Stat Sin; 2008; 18(3):881-904. PubMed ID: 19018297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]