These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2509444)

  • 1. [Dental adhesive and sealing products submitted to biological in vivo control].
    Virgillito A; Holz J
    J Biol Buccale; 1989 Sep; 17(3):209-24. PubMed ID: 2509444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A histologic study of the biocompatibility of a dentinal bonding system.
    Elbaum R; Pignoly C; Brouillet JL
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Nov; 22(11):901-10. PubMed ID: 1812514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [6 dentin adhesive products subjected to controls in vitro].
    Neroni M; Regad C; Christen O; Thoenen S; Holz J
    J Biol Buccale; 1990 Dec; 18(4):271-85. PubMed ID: 1965650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biocompatibility of a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement applied as pulp capping in human teeth.
    do Nascimento AB; Fontana UF; Teixeira HM; Costa CA
    Am J Dent; 2000 Feb; 13(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 11763899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pulpal response to a newly developed MMA based resin cement for bonding tooth-colored indirect restorations.
    Seki Y; Shimada Y; Foxton RM; Tagami J
    Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):297-302. PubMed ID: 17076029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pulp response and cytotoxicity evaluation of 2 dentin bonding agents.
    Demarco FF; Tarquinio SB; Jaeger MM; de Araújo VC; Matson E
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Mar; 32(3):211-20. PubMed ID: 12066661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative evaluation of the marginal sealing ability of Fuji VII and Concise as pit and fissure sealants.
    Ganesh M; Shobha T
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 May; 8(4):10-8. PubMed ID: 17486182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microleakage of Class II box-type composite restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Roeters JJ; Burgersdijk RC
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):160-4. PubMed ID: 10388369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cytotoxicity of four categories of dental cements.
    Schmid-Schwap M; Franz A; König F; Bristela M; Lucas T; Piehslinger E; Watts DC; Schedle A
    Dent Mater; 2009 Mar; 25(3):360-8. PubMed ID: 18849067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microleakage of various cementing agents for full cast crowns.
    Piwowarczyk A; Lauer HC; Sorensen JA
    Dent Mater; 2005 May; 21(5):445-53. PubMed ID: 15826701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of fatigue loading on the quality of the cement layer and retention strength of carbon fiber post-resin composite core restorations.
    Bolhuis P; de Gee A; Feilzer A
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(2):220-7. PubMed ID: 15853108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of temporary materials on bond strength of resin-modified glass-ionomer luting cements to teeth.
    Terata R; Nakashima K; Kubota M
    Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):209-11. PubMed ID: 11763933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Histopathological response of infected cavities treated with Gluma and Scotchbond dentin bonding agents.
    Cox CF; Felton D; Bergenholtz G
    Am J Dent; 1988 Sep; 1 Spec No():189-94. PubMed ID: 3150282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Class I occlusal composite resin restorations: in vivo post-operative sensitivity, wall adaptation, and microleakage.
    Opdam NJ; Feilzer AJ; Roeters JJ; Smale I
    Am J Dent; 1998 Oct; 11(5):229-34. PubMed ID: 10388382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of new bonding systems on microleakage.
    Swift EJ; Hansen SE
    Am J Dent; 1989 Jun; 2(3):77-80. PubMed ID: 2513841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An in vitro study of microleakage of occlusal composite restorations polymerized by a conventional curing light and a PAC curing light.
    Stritikus J; Owens B
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 11314147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Handling and clinical performance of a glass ionomer sealant.
    Smales RJ; Lee YK; Lo FW; Tse CC; Chung MS
    Am J Dent; 1996 Oct; 9(5):203-5. PubMed ID: 9545905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study.
    Abraham MM; Sudeep PT; Bhat KS
    Indian J Dent Res; 1999; 10(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 10865391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biocompatibility of a flowable composite bonded with a self-etching adhesive compared with a glass lonomer cement and a high copper amalgam.
    Shimada Y; Seki Y; Sasafuchi Y; Arakawa M; Burrow MF; Otsuki M; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 14753328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.