710 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25095316)
1. The effects of dentin adhesives and liner materials on the microleakage of class II resin composite restorations in primary and permanent teeth.
Güngör HC; Canoğlu E; Cehreli ZC
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2014; 38(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 25095316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microleakage of a self-adhesive class V composite on primary and permanent dentitions.
Shafiei L; Mojiri P; Ghahraman Y; Rakhshan V
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):461-7. PubMed ID: 24171990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of flowable materials on microleakage of nanofilled and hybrid Class II composite restorations with LED and QTH LCUs.
Sadeghi M
Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 19553715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microleakage after thermocycling of 4 etch and rinse and 3 self-etch adhesives with and without a flowable composite lining.
Guéders AM; Charpentier JF; Albert AI; Geerts SO
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 16924985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques.
Fahmy AE; Farrag NM
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 35(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 21417120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of surface pretreatment on the microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement restorations.
Bayrak S; Sen TE; Tuloglu N
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2012; 36(3):279-84. PubMed ID: 22838231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of salivary contamination on microleakage of resin composites placed with a self-etch adhesive in primary teeth: an in vitro study.
Fakhri M; Seraj B; Shahrabi M; Motahhary P; Hooshmand T
Pediatr Dent; 2009; 31(4):334-9. PubMed ID: 19722444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microleakage of posterior composite restorations lined with self-adhesive resin cements.
Al-Saleh M; El-Mowafy O; Tam L; Fenton A
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):556-63. PubMed ID: 20945747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage in class V cavities.
Yazici AR; Baseren M; Dayangaç B
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 12540117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of adhesive systems and bevel on enamel margin integrity in primary and permanent teeth.
Swanson TK; Feigal RJ; Tantbirojn D; Hodges JS
Pediatr Dent; 2008; 30(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 18481578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microleakage of Er:YAG laser and dental bur prepared cavities in primary teeth restored with different adhesive restorative materials.
Baghalian A; Nakhjavani YB; Hooshmand T; Motahhary P; Bahramian H
Lasers Med Sci; 2013 Nov; 28(6):1453-60. PubMed ID: 23135785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of resin composite shade and location of the gingival margin on the microleakage of posterior restorations.
Araujo Fde O; Vieira LC; Monteiro Junior S
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(5):556-61. PubMed ID: 17024943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vivo and in vitro evaluations of microleakage around Class I amalgam and composite restorations.
Alptekin T; Ozer F; Unlu N; Cobanoglu N; Blatz MB
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 21180003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Restoration interface microleakage using one total-etch and three self-etch adhesives.
Deliperi S; Bardwell DN; Wegley C
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 17427828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of fiber nets, application techniques and flowable composites on microleakage and the effect of fiber nets on polymerization shrinkage in class II MOD cavities.
Ozel E; Soyman M
Oper Dent; 2009; 34(2):174-80. PubMed ID: 19363973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of immediate dentin sealing on the marginal adaptation and bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch adhesives.
Duarte S; de Freitas CR; Saad JR; Sadan A
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jul; 102(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19573687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
