BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25096109)

  • 1. Stimulus and listener factors affecting age-related changes in competing speech perception.
    Helfer KS; Freyman RL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):748-59. PubMed ID: 25096109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Masked speech perception across the adult lifespan: Impact of age and hearing impairment.
    Goossens T; Vercammen C; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():109-124. PubMed ID: 27845259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robust relationship between reading span and speech recognition in noise.
    Souza P; Arehart K
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(10):705-13. PubMed ID: 25975360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The relative importance of consonant and vowel segments to the recognition of words and sentences: effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Kewley-Port D; Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1667-78. PubMed ID: 22978895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hearing impairment, cognition and speech understanding: exploratory factor analyses of a comprehensive test battery for a group of hearing aid users, the n200 study.
    Rönnberg J; Lunner T; Ng EH; Lidestam B; Zekveld AA; Sörqvist P; Lyxell B; Träff U; Yumba W; Classon E; Hällgren M; Larsby B; Signoret C; Pichora-Fuller MK; Rudner M; Danielsson H; Stenfelt S
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):623-42. PubMed ID: 27589015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of age and hearing loss on recognition of unaccented and accented multisyllabic words.
    Gordon-Salant S; Yeni-Komshian GH; Fitzgibbons PJ; Cohen JI
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):884-97. PubMed ID: 25698021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of stimulus-related factors and hearing impairment on listening effort as indicated by pupil dilation.
    Ohlenforst B; Zekveld AA; Lunner T; Wendt D; Naylor G; Wang Y; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():68-79. PubMed ID: 28622894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
    Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of segmentation difficulties in speech-in-speech understanding in older and hearing-impaired adults.
    Woodfield A; Akeroyd MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):EL26-31. PubMed ID: 20649185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of fundamental-frequency and sentence-onset differences on speech-identification performance of young and older adults in a competing-talker background.
    Lee JH; Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1700-17. PubMed ID: 22978898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: a first report.
    Tamati TN; Gilbert JL; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(7):616-34. PubMed ID: 24047949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age-related changes in listening effort for various types of masker noises.
    Desjardins JL; Doherty KA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 23095723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A method for measuring the intelligibility of uninterrupted, continuous speech.
    MacPherson A; Akeroyd MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1027-30. PubMed ID: 24606245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the NAL Dynamic Conversations Test in older listeners with hearing loss.
    Best V; Keidser G; Freeston K; Buchholz JM
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):221-229. PubMed ID: 28826285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of Tinnitus and Duration of Deafness on Sound Localization and Speech Recognition in Noise in Patients With Single-Sided Deafness.
    Liu YW; Cheng X; Chen B; Peng K; Ishiyama A; Fu QJ
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518813802. PubMed ID: 30509148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aging, spatial cues, and single- versus dual-task performance in competing speech perception.
    Helfer KS; Chevalier J; Freyman RL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3625-33. PubMed ID: 21218894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of hearing aid algorithms using a master hearing aid: the influence of hearing aid experience on the relationship between speech recognition and cognitive capacity.
    Rählmann S; Meis M; Schulte M; Kießling J; Walger M; Meister H
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S105-S111. PubMed ID: 28449597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simultaneous and forward masking of vowels and stop consonants: Effects of age, hearing loss, and spectral shaping.
    Fogerty D; Bologna WJ; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Feb; 141(2):1133. PubMed ID: 28253707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Just-Meaningful Difference in Speech-to-Noise Ratio.
    McShefferty D; Whitmer WM; Akeroyd MA
    Trends Hear; 2016 Feb; 20():. PubMed ID: 26834121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.