These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25096111)

  • 1. Application of a short-time version of the Equalization-Cancellation model to speech intelligibility experiments with speech maskers.
    Wan R; Durlach NI; Colburn HS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):768-76. PubMed ID: 25096111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of an extended equalization-cancellation model to speech intelligibility with spatially distributed maskers.
    Wan R; Durlach NI; Colburn HS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3678-90. PubMed ID: 21218900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A harmonic-cancellation-based model to predict speech intelligibility against a harmonic masker.
    Prud'homme L; Lavandier M; Best V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Nov; 148(5):3246. PubMed ID: 33261378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting binaural speech intelligibility using the signal-to-noise ratio in the envelope power spectrum domain.
    Chabot-Leclerc A; MacDonald EN; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):192. PubMed ID: 27475146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A dynamic binaural harmonic-cancellation model to predict speech intelligibility against a harmonic masker varying in intonation, temporal envelope, and location.
    Prud'homme L; Lavandier M; Best V
    Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108535. PubMed ID: 35654633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A model that predicts the binaural advantage to speech intelligibility from the mixed target and interferer signals.
    Cosentino S; Marquardt T; McAlpine D; Culling JF; Falk TH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Feb; 135(2):796-807. PubMed ID: 25234888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The intelligibility of speech in a harmonic masker varying in fundamental frequency contour, broadband temporal envelope, and spatial location.
    Leclère T; Lavandier M; Deroche MLD
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():1-10. PubMed ID: 28390253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Revision and validation of a binaural model for speech intelligibility in noise.
    Jelfs S; Culling JF; Lavandier M
    Hear Res; 2011 May; 275(1-2):96-104. PubMed ID: 21156201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A joint framework for blind prediction of binaural speech intelligibility and perceived listening effort.
    Rennies J; Röttges S; Huber R; Hauth CF; Brand T
    Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108598. PubMed ID: 35995688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigating the role of harmonic cancellation in speech-on-speech masking.
    Prud'homme L; Lavandier M; Best V
    Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108562. PubMed ID: 35768309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of nearby maskers on speech intelligibility in reverberant, multi-talker environments.
    Westermann A; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):2214. PubMed ID: 28372143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Role of masker predictability in the cocktail party problem.
    Jones GL; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3818-30. PubMed ID: 19206808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of short-time intensity and envelope power for speech intelligibility and psychoacoustic masking.
    Biberger T; Ewert SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):1098. PubMed ID: 28863616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of masker type on early reflection processing and speech intelligibility (L).
    Arweiler I; Buchholz JM; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 23297878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microscopic prediction of speech intelligibility in spatially distributed speech-shaped noise for normal-hearing listeners.
    Geravanchizadeh M; Fallah A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):4004-15. PubMed ID: 26723354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monaural speech intelligibility and detection in maskers with varying amounts of spectro-temporal speech features.
    Schubotz W; Brand T; Kollmeier B; Ewert SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):524. PubMed ID: 27475175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A metric for predicting binaural speech intelligibility in stationary noise and competing speech maskers.
    Tang Y; Cooke M; Fazenda BM; Cox TJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Sep; 140(3):1858. PubMed ID: 27914424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modeling the effects of a single reflection on binaural speech intelligibility.
    Rennies J; Warzybok A; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1556-67. PubMed ID: 24606290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intelligibility in speech maskers with a binaural cochlear implant sound coding strategy inspired by the contralateral medial olivocochlear reflex.
    Lopez-Poveda EA; Eustaquio-Martín A; Stohl JS; Wolford RD; Schatzer R; Gorospe JM; Ruiz SSC; Benito F; Wilson BS
    Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():134-137. PubMed ID: 28188882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Binaural Grouping Model for Predicting Speech Intelligibility in Multitalker Environments.
    Mi J; Colburn HS
    Trends Hear; 2016 Oct; 20():. PubMed ID: 27698261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.