137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25096153)
1. Effect of bone-conduction harmonic distortions on hearing thresholds.
Eichenauer A; Dillon H; Clinch B; Loi T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):EL96-102. PubMed ID: 25096153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electro-acoustic performance of the new bone vibrator Radioear B81: a comparison with the conventional Radioear B71.
Jansson KJ; Håkansson B; Johannsen L; Tengstrand T
Int J Audiol; 2015 May; 54(5):334-40. PubMed ID: 25519145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurements of bone conduction auditory brainstem response with the new audiometric bone conduction transducer Radioear B81.
Keceli S; Stenfelt S
Int J Audiol; 2018 Aug; 57(8):577-583. PubMed ID: 29911916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Vibrotactile Thresholds on the Mastoid and Forehead Position of Deaf Patients Using Radioear B71 and B81.
Fredén Jansson KJ; Håkansson B; Reinfeldt S; Fröhlich L; Rahne T
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):714-723. PubMed ID: 28737551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Bone-Conducted Cervical VEMPs Elicited by B71 and B81 Bone Vibrators.
Romero DJ; Piker EG; Thorne A; Clinard C
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):596-605. PubMed ID: 33577217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acoustic method for calibration of audiometric bone vibrators. II. Harmonic distortion.
Ginter SM; Margolis RH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):EL33-7. PubMed ID: 23862903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of transducer types on bone conduction hearing thresholds.
Fröhlich L; Plontke SK; Rahne T
PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0195233. PubMed ID: 29641550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electroacoustic evaluation of the bone conduction transducer B250 for vestibular and hearing diagnostics in comparison with Radioear B71 and B81.
Fredén Jansson KJ; Håkansson B; Persson AC; Verrecchia L; Reinfeldt S
Int J Audiol; 2024 May; ():1-7. PubMed ID: 38742487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effective masking levels for bone conduction auditory steady state responses in infants and adults with normal hearing.
Hansen EE; Small SA
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):257-66. PubMed ID: 21926629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Calibration force levels for bone conduction vibrators.
Billings BL; Winter M
J Speech Hear Res; 1977 Dec; 20(4):653-60. PubMed ID: 604679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Infant air and bone conduction tone burst auditory brain stem responses for classification of hearing loss and the relationship to behavioral thresholds.
Vander Werff KR; Prieve BA; Georgantas LM
Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):350-68. PubMed ID: 19322084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bone conduction threshold levels for different bone vibrator types.
Frank T; Byrne DC; Richards LA
J Speech Hear Disord; 1988 Aug; 53(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 3398482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparisons of auditory steady state response and behavioral air conduction and bone conduction thresholds for infants and adults with normal hearing.
Casey KA; Small SA
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(4):423-39. PubMed ID: 24569693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characterization and Clinical Use of Bone Conduction Transducers at Extended High Frequencies.
Remenschneider AK; Cheng JT; Herrmann BS; Rosowski JJ
Hear Res; 2023 Mar; 429():108688. PubMed ID: 36628803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. New version of the TEN test with calibrations in dB HL.
Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Stone MA
Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):478-87. PubMed ID: 15599194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multiple auditory steady-state response thresholds to bone-conduction stimuli in young infants with normal hearing.
Small SA; Stapells DR
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 16672791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Maturation of the occlusion effect: a bone conduction auditory steady state response study in infants and adults with normal hearing.
Small SA; Hu N
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):708-19. PubMed ID: 21617531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A standard determination of paired air- and bone-conduction thresholds under different masking noise conditions.
Robinson DW; Shipton MS
Audiology; 1982; 21(1):61-82. PubMed ID: 7055482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bone conduction hearing sensitivity in normal-hearing subjects: transcutaneous stimulation at BAHA vs BCI position.
Reinfeldt S; Håkansson B; Taghavi H; Eeg-Olofsson M
Int J Audiol; 2014 Jun; 53(6):360-9. PubMed ID: 24588466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effective masking levels for 500 and 2000 Hz bone conduction auditory steady state responses in infants and adults with normal hearing.
Small SA; Smyth A; Leon G
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 24121647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
