BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25097098)

  • 1. Strategic foresight: how planning for the unpredictable can improve environmental decision-making.
    Cook CN; Inayatullah S; Burgman MA; Sutherland WJ; Wintle BA
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2014 Sep; 29(9):531-41. PubMed ID: 25097098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using strategic foresight to assess conservation opportunity.
    Cook CN; Wintle BC; Aldrich SC; Wintle BA
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1474-83. PubMed ID: 25381735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Foresight science in conservation: Tools, barriers, and mainstreaming opportunities.
    Ednie G; Kapoor T; Koppel O; Piczak ML; Reid JL; Murdoch AD; Cook CN; Sutherland WJ; Cooke SJ
    Ambio; 2023 Feb; 52(2):411-424. PubMed ID: 36287382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using the Value of Information to improve conservation decision making.
    Bolam FC; Grainger MJ; Mengersen KL; Stewart GB; Sutherland WJ; Runge MC; McGowan PJK
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2019 Apr; 94(2):629-647. PubMed ID: 30280477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Horizon Scan of Global Conservation Issues for 2016.
    Sutherland WJ; Broad S; Caine J; Clout M; Dicks LV; Doran H; Entwistle AC; Fleishman E; Gibbons DW; Keim B; LeAnstey B; Lickorish FA; Markillie P; Monk KA; Mortimer D; Ockendon N; Pearce-Higgins JW; Peck LS; Pretty J; Rockström J; Spalding MD; Tonneijck FH; Wintle BC; Wright KE
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2016 Jan; 31(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 26688445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Integrating horizon scanning and strategic risk prioritisation using a weight of evidence framework to inform policy decisions.
    Garnett K; Lickorish FA; Rocks SA; Prpich G; Rathe AA; Pollard SJ
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Aug; 560-561():82-91. PubMed ID: 27093126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Strategic environmental assessment in Hong Kong.
    Ng KL; Obbard JP
    Environ Int; 2005 May; 31(4):483-92. PubMed ID: 15788189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Landscape ecological assessment: a tool for integrating biodiversity issues in strategic environmental assessment and planning.
    Mörtberg UM; Balfors B; Knol WC
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Mar; 82(4):457-70. PubMed ID: 16574306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The need for environmental horizon scanning.
    Sutherland WJ; Woodroof HJ
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2009 Oct; 24(10):523-7. PubMed ID: 19660827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Understanding farmers' strategic decision-making processes and the implications for biodiversity conservation policy.
    Farmar-Bowers Q; Lane R
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Feb; 90(2):1135-44. PubMed ID: 18565641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Turning science into policy: challenges and experiences from the science-policy interface.
    Watson RT
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2005 Feb; 360(1454):471-7. PubMed ID: 15814358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Foundations of resilience thinking.
    Curtin CG; Parker JP
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Aug; 28(4):912-23. PubMed ID: 24975863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. From irreversibility to participation: towards a participatory foresight for the governance of collective environmental risks.
    Faucheux S; Hue C
    J Hazard Mater; 2001 Sep; 86(1-3):223-43. PubMed ID: 11532368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scientific commentary: Strategic analysis of environmental policy risks--heat maps, risk futures and the character of environmental harm.
    Prpich G; Dagonneau J; Rocks SA; Lickorish F; Pollard SJ
    Sci Total Environ; 2013 Oct; 463-464():442-5. PubMed ID: 23827364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The rise of research on futures in ecology: rebalancing scenarios and predictions.
    Coreau A; Pinay G; Thompson JD; Cheptou PO; Mermet L
    Ecol Lett; 2009 Dec; 12(12):1277-86. PubMed ID: 19874385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating the potential for conservation development: biophysical, economic, and institutional perspectives.
    Pejchar L; Morgan PM; Caldwell MR; Palmer C; Daily GC
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Feb; 21(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 17298512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Land-use Decisions in Complex Commons: Engaging Multiple Stakeholders through Foresight and Scenario Building in Indonesia.
    Shantiko B; Liswanti N; Bourgeois R; Laumonier Y
    Environ Manage; 2021 Nov; 68(5):642-664. PubMed ID: 33852027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Organising evidence for environmental management decisions: a '4S' hierarchy.
    Dicks LV; Walsh JC; Sutherland WJ
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2014 Nov; 29(11):607-13. PubMed ID: 25280588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Decision making for independent municipal action.
    Kurth M; Fox-Lent C; Golan M; Linkov I
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2018 Mar; 14(2):194-197. PubMed ID: 29193832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Emerging conservation challenges and prospects in an era of offshore hydrocarbon exploration and exploitation.
    Kark S; Brokovich E; Mazor T; Levin N
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Dec; 29(6):1573-85. PubMed ID: 26219342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.