BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25097137)

  • 1. Image quality of iterative reconstruction in cranial CT imaging: comparison of model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR).
    Notohamiprodjo S; Deak Z; Meurer F; Maertz F; Mueck FG; Geyer LL; Wirth S
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Jan; 25(1):140-6. PubMed ID: 25097137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Standard and reduced radiation dose liver CT images: adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus model-based iterative reconstruction-comparison of findings and image quality.
    Shuman WP; Chan KT; Busey JM; Mitsumori LM; Choi E; Koprowicz KM; Kanal KM
    Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 25170546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique.
    Katsura M; Matsuda I; Akahane M; Sato J; Akai H; Yasaka K; Kunimatsu A; Ohtomo K
    Eur Radiol; 2012 Aug; 22(8):1613-23. PubMed ID: 22538629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of a full model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in 80 kVp ultra-low-dose paranasal sinus CT imaging of pediatric patients.
    Sun J; Zhang Q; Duan X; Zhang C; Wang P; Jia C; Liu Y; Peng Y
    Radiol Med; 2018 Feb; 123(2):117-124. PubMed ID: 29019028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CT of the chest with model-based, fully iterative reconstruction: comparison with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
    Ichikawa Y; Kitagawa K; Nagasawa N; Murashima S; Sakuma H
    BMC Med Imaging; 2013 Aug; 13():27. PubMed ID: 23927627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance evaluation of two iterative reconstruction algorithms, MBIR and ASIR, in low radiation dose and low contrast dose abdominal CT in children.
    Sun J; Yang L; Zhou Z; Zhang D; Han W; Zhang Q; Peng Y
    Radiol Med; 2020 Oct; 125(10):918-925. PubMed ID: 32319005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of a model-based, iterative reconstruction algorithm (MBIR) regarding image quality and dose reduction in liver computed tomography.
    Chang W; Lee JM; Lee K; Yoon JH; Yu MH; Han JK; Choi BI
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):598-606. PubMed ID: 23511193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) on image quality in cerebral CT angiography before and after intracranial aneurysm treatment.
    Hajdu SD; Daniel RT; Meuli RA; Zerlauth JB; Dunet V
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 May; 102():109-114. PubMed ID: 29685523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of image quality and radiation dose reduction in upper abdominal computed tomography using model-based iterative reconstruction; comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
    Nakamoto A; Kim T; Hori M; Onishi H; Tsuboyama T; Sakane M; Tatsumi M; Tomiyama N
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Sep; 84(9):1715-23. PubMed ID: 26037266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Iterative reconstruction: comparison of techniques for reduced-dose liver computed tomography following transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Cha MJ; Jeong WK; Choi D; Kim YK; Lim S; Choi SY; Lee WJ
    Acta Radiol; 2016 Dec; 57(12):1429-1437. PubMed ID: 26792822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Image quality in children with low-radiation chest CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and model-based iterative reconstruction.
    Sun J; Peng Y; Duan X; Yu T; Zhang Q; Liu Y; Hu D
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e96045. PubMed ID: 24828429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Model-based iterative reconstruction compared to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and filtered back-projection in CT of the kidneys and the adjacent retroperitoneum.
    Olcott EW; Shin LK; Sommer G; Chan I; Rosenberg J; Molvin FL; Boas FE; Fleischmann D
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Jun; 21(6):774-84. PubMed ID: 24809318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Renovascular CT: comparison between adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and model-based iterative reconstruction.
    Noda Y; Goshima S; Koyasu H; Shigeyama S; Miyoshi T; Kawada H; Kawai N; Matsuo M
    Clin Radiol; 2017 Oct; 72(10):901.e13-901.e19. PubMed ID: 28673448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: dose reduction potential in the abdomen.
    Singh S; Kalra MK; Do S; Thibault JB; Pien H; O'Connor OJ; Blake MA
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 22592622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and a model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: an experimental clinical study.
    Deák Z; Grimm JM; Treitl M; Geyer LL; Linsenmaier U; Körner M; Reiser MF; Wirth S
    Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):197-206. PubMed ID: 23169793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of pure and hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithms on high-resolution computed tomography in the evaluation of interstitial lung disease.
    Katsura M; Sato J; Akahane M; Mise Y; Sumida K; Abe O
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 93():243-251. PubMed ID: 28668422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving image quality with model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm for chest CT in children with reduced contrast concentration.
    Sun J; Hu D; Shen Y; Yang H; Chen C; Yin J; Peng Y
    Radiol Med; 2019 Jul; 124(7):595-601. PubMed ID: 30739289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the image qualities of filtered back-projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and model-based iterative reconstruction for CT venography at 80 kVp.
    Kim JH; Choo KS; Moon TY; Lee JW; Jeon UB; Kim TU; Hwang JY; Yun MJ; Jeong DW; Lim SJ
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Jul; 26(7):2055-63. PubMed ID: 26486938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Abdominal CT with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR): initial results of a prospective trial comparing ultralow-dose with standard-dose imaging.
    Pickhardt PJ; Lubner MG; Kim DH; Tang J; Ruma JA; del Rio AM; Chen GH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Dec; 199(6):1266-74. PubMed ID: 23169718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Image quality of CT angiography with model-based iterative reconstruction in young children with congenital heart disease: comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
    Son SS; Choo KS; Jeon UB; Jeon GR; Nam KJ; Kim TU; Yeom JA; Hwang JY; Jeong DW; Lim SJ
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jun; 31 Suppl 1():31-8. PubMed ID: 25414055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.