These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25097310)

  • 21. Comparison of endopyelotomy and laparoscopic pyeloplasty for poorly functioning kidneys with ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Singh P; Kapoor R; Suri A; Singh KJ; Mandhani A; Dubey D; Srivastava A; Kumar A
    Indian J Urol; 2007 Jan; 23(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 19675751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Is secondary robotic pyeloplasty safe and effective as primary robotic pyeloplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Dirie NI; Ahmed MA; Wang S
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Apr; 14(2):241-248. PubMed ID: 31280462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Concomitant percutaneous nephrolithotomy and transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction complicated by stones.
    Agarwal A; Varshney A; Bansal BS
    J Endourol; 2008 Oct; 22(10):2251-5. PubMed ID: 18831672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: Comparison of two surgical approaches -- a single centre experience of three years.
    Bansal P; Gupta A; Mongha R; Narayan S; Kundu AK; Chakraborty SC; Das RK; Bera MK
    J Minim Access Surg; 2008 Jul; 4(3):76-9. PubMed ID: 19547693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: outcome of initial 12 procedures.
    Iwamura M; Soh S; Irie A; Kadowaki K; Matsusita Y; Fujioka T; Baba S
    Int J Urol; 2004 Jul; 11(7):449-55. PubMed ID: 15242351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Redo Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Infants and Children: Feasible and Effective.
    Al-Hazmi H; Peycelon M; Carricaburu E; Manzoni G; Neel KF; Ali L; Grapin C; Paye-Jaouen A; El-Ghoneimi A
    Front Pediatr; 2020; 8():546741. PubMed ID: 33240828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A prospective comparison of robotic and laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
    Link RE; Bhayani SB; Kavoussi LR
    Ann Surg; 2006 Apr; 243(4):486-91. PubMed ID: 16552199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Sundaram CP; Grubb RL; Rehman J; Yan Y; Chen C; Landman J; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
    J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2037-40. PubMed ID: 12771713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Laparoscopic management of recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction following pyeloplasty.
    Abraham GP; Siddaiah AT; Ramaswami K; George D; Das K
    Urol Ann; 2015; 7(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 25834982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cost-effective laparoscopic pyeloplasty: single center experience.
    Hemal AK; Goel R; Goel A
    Int J Urol; 2003 Nov; 10(11):563-8. PubMed ID: 14633078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Comparison of three dimensional and two dimentional laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction].
    Xu W; Li H; Ji Z; Zhang X; Zhang Y; Xiao H; Liu G
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 52(10):771-4. PubMed ID: 25573218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: comparison of two surgical approaches- a single centre experience of three years.
    Bansal P; Gupta A; Mongha R; Narayan S; Das RK; Bera M; Chakraborty SC; Kundu AK
    Indian J Surg; 2011 Aug; 73(4):264-7. PubMed ID: 22851839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus open pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.
    Abdel-Karim AM; Fahmy A; Moussa A; Rashad H; Elbadry M; Badawy H; Hammady A
    J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Dec; 12(6):401.e1-401.e6. PubMed ID: 27614698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a prospective randomized study.
    Tugcu V; Ilbey YO; Sonmezay E; Aras B; Tasci AI
    Int J Urol; 2013 Nov; 20(11):1112-7. PubMed ID: 23441754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in pediatric patients: the SGPGI experience.
    Maheshwari R; Ansari MS; Mandhani A; Srivastava A; Kapoor R
    Indian J Urol; 2010; 26(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 20535282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Safety profile and complications of transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a critical analysis.
    Mandhani A; Kumar D; Kumar A; Kapoor R; Dubey D; Srivastava A; Bhandari M
    J Endourol; 2005 Sep; 19(7):797-802. PubMed ID: 16190831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Failed pyeloplasty in children: Is robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair feasible?
    Asensio M; Gander R; Royo GF; Lloret J
    J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):69.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25791423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction via Retroperitoneal and Transperitoneal Approaches.
    Ji F; Chen L; Wu C; Li J; Hang Y; Yan B
    Front Pediatr; 2021; 9():707266. PubMed ID: 34395345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Laparoscopic stentless pyeloplasty: an early experience.
    Kumar V; Mandhani A
    Indian J Urol; 2010; 26(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 20535285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Functional outcome after laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children.
    Szavay PO; Luithle T; Seitz G; Warmann SW; Haber P; Fuchs J
    J Pediatr Urol; 2010 Aug; 6(4):359-63. PubMed ID: 19926340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.