These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25097645)

  • 1. Effect of 0.2% chlorhexidine on microbial and fungal contamination of dental unit waterlines.
    Agahi RH; Hashemipour MA; Kalantari M; Ayatollah-Mosavi A; Aghassi H; Nassab AH
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2014 May; 11(3):351-6. PubMed ID: 25097645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of microbial profile in dental unit waterlines and assessment of antimicrobial efficacy of two treating agents.
    Mungara J; Dilna NC; Joseph E; Reddy N
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2013; 37(4):367-71. PubMed ID: 24046983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microbial quality of water in dental unit waterlines.
    Nikaeen M; Hatamzadeh M; Sabzevari Z; Zareh O
    J Res Med Sci; 2009 Sep; 14(5):297-300. PubMed ID: 21772899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Effect of Using Hydrogen Peroxide for Periodic Disinfection Combined With Continuous Disinfection to Control Contamination in Dental Unit Waterline].
    Chang J; Dang Y; Wang C; Li X
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2024 Jan; 55(1):217-223. PubMed ID: 38322511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microbial contamination in dental unit waterlines.
    Souza-Gugelmin MC; Lima CD; Lima SN; Mian H; Ito IY
    Braz Dent J; 2003; 14(1):55-7. PubMed ID: 12656466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reducing bacterial counts in dental unit waterlines: tap water versus distilled water.
    Kettering JD; Stephens JA; Muñoz-Viveros CA; Naylor WP
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2002 Aug; 3(3):1-9. PubMed ID: 12239573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reduction of bacterial levels in dental unit waterlines.
    Porteous NB; Cooley RL
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Sep; 35(8):630-4. PubMed ID: 15366526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of iodine in microbial control of dental treatment water.
    Puttaiah R; Seibert J; Spears R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 May; 12(3):143-51. PubMed ID: 22186807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiparametric analysis of waterline contamination in dental units.
    Barbeau J; Tanguay R; Faucher E; Avezard C; Trudel L; Côté L; Prévost AP
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1996 Nov; 62(11):3954-9. PubMed ID: 8899982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reducing bacterial counts in dental unit waterlines: distilled water vs. antimicrobial agents.
    Kettering JD; Muñoz-Viveros CA; Stephens JA; Naylor WP; Zhang W
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2002 Oct; 30(10):735-41. PubMed ID: 12403476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Isolation of an unusual fungus in treated dental unit waterlines.
    Porteous NB; Redding SW; Thompson EH; Grooters AM; De Hoog S; Sutton DA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Jul; 134(7):853-8. PubMed ID: 12892442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breaking the Chain of Infection: Dental Unit Water Quality Control.
    Pawar A; Garg S; Mehta S; Dang R
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Jul; 10(7):ZC80-4. PubMed ID: 27630960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of microbiota diversity in dental unit waterline contamination.
    Dang Y; Zhang Q; Wang J; Wang Q; Han M; Niu Y; Li H; Li X
    PeerJ; 2022; 10():e12723. PubMed ID: 35036099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three key factors influencing the bacterial contamination of dental unit waterlines: a 6-year survey from 2012 to 2017.
    Ji XY; Fei CN; Zhang Y; Liu J; Liu H; Song J
    Int Dent J; 2019 Jun; 69(3):192-199. PubMed ID: 30565215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Disinfection methods of dental unit waterlines contamination: a systematic review.
    Wu M; Shi Z; Yu X; Xu Y; Jin X; Zhang L; Fu B
    J Med Microbiol; 2022 Jun; 71(6):. PubMed ID: 35670283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative evaluation of effect of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine in dental unit waterline on aerosolized bacteria generated during dental treatment.
    Patil R; Hindlekar A; Jadhav GR; Mittal P; Humnabad V; Di Blasio M; Cicciù M; Minervini G
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Nov; 23(1):865. PubMed ID: 37964280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Plasma Sterilization Effectively Reduces Bacterial Contamination in Dental Unit Waterlines.
    Noopan S; Unchui P; Techotinnakorn S; Ampornaramveth RS
    Int J Dent; 2019; 2019():5720204. PubMed ID: 31467546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of bacterial contamination of dental unit waterlines and use of a newly designed measurement device to assess retraction of a dental chair unit.
    Ji XY; Fei CN; Zhang Y; Zhang W; Liu J; Dong J
    Int Dent J; 2016 Aug; 66(4):208-14. PubMed ID: 27000421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An investigation of the microbial contamination of dental unit air and water lines.
    Walker RJ; Burke FJ; Miller CH; Palenik CJ
    Int Dent J; 2004 Dec; 54(6):438-44. PubMed ID: 15633500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative evaluation of chlorhexidine and cinnamon extract used in dental unit waterlines to reduce bacterial load in aerosols during ultrasonic scaling.
    Mamajiwala AS; Sethi KS; Raut CP; Karde PA; Khedkar SU
    Indian J Dent Res; 2018; 29(6):749-754. PubMed ID: 30589003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.