These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25097870)

  • 1. Advanced emergency braking controller design for pedestrian protection oriented automotive collision avoidance system.
    Lie G; Zejian R; Pingshu G; Jing C
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():218246. PubMed ID: 25097870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Research on Longitudinal Active Collision Avoidance of Autonomous Emergency Braking Pedestrian System (AEB-P).
    Yang W; Zhang X; Lei Q; Cheng X
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Oct; 19(21):. PubMed ID: 31661814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimated benefit of automated emergency braking systems for vehicle-pedestrian crashes in the United States.
    Haus SH; Sherony R; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S171-S176. PubMed ID: 31381447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of automated emergency braking system's avoidance of pedestrian crashes at intersections under occluded conditions within a virtual simulator.
    Abdel-Aty M; Cai Q; Wu Y; Zheng O
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Oct; 176():106797. PubMed ID: 35964393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A novel framework to evaluate pedestrian safety at non-signalized locations.
    Fu T; Miranda-Moreno L; Saunier N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Feb; 111():23-33. PubMed ID: 29169102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Emergency collision avoidance strategy for autonomous vehicles based on steering and differential braking.
    Li H; Zheng T; Xia F; Gao L; Ye Q; Guo Z
    Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):22647. PubMed ID: 36587056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Time-to-collision analysis of pedestrian and pedal-cycle accidents for the development of autonomous emergency braking systems.
    Lenard J; Welsh R; Danton R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jun; 115():128-136. PubMed ID: 29567589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Potential benefits of controlled vehicle braking to reduce pedestrian ground contact injuries.
    Zou T; Shang S; Simms C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Aug; 129():94-107. PubMed ID: 31132748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Real life safety benefits of increasing brake deceleration in car-to-pedestrian accidents: Simulation of Vacuum Emergency Braking.
    Jeppsson H; Östling M; Lubbe N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Feb; 111():311-320. PubMed ID: 29257980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Situational characteristics of fatal pedestrian accidents involving vehicles traveling at low speeds in Japan.
    Matsui Y; Oikawa S
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S1-S6. PubMed ID: 31381444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of Integrated Pedestrian Protection Systems with Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) and Passive Safety Components.
    Edwards M; Nathanson A; Carroll J; Wisch M; Zander O; Lubbe N
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 1():S2-S11. PubMed ID: 26027971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Design of an Estimator Using the Artificial Neural Network Technique to Characterise the Braking of a Motor Vehicle.
    Garrosa M; Olmeda E; Díaz V; Mendoza-Petit MF
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Feb; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 35214546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Safer passenger car front shapes for pedestrians: A computational approach to reduce overall pedestrian injury risk in realistic impact scenarios.
    Li G; Yang J; Simms C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Mar; 100():97-110. PubMed ID: 28129577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characteristics of rear-end crashes involving passenger vehicles with automatic emergency braking.
    Cicchino JB; Zuby DS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S112-S118. PubMed ID: 31381436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the required complexity of vehicle dynamic models for use in simulation-based highway design.
    Brown A; Brennan S
    J Safety Res; 2014 Jun; 49():105-12. PubMed ID: 24913474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Collision-free emergency planning and control methods for CAVs considering intentions of surrounding vehicles.
    Zhao S; Zhang J; He C; Huang M; Ji Y; Liu W
    ISA Trans; 2023 May; 136():535-547. PubMed ID: 36371261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of safety measures on driver's speed behavior at pedestrian crossings.
    Bella F; Silvestri M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Oct; 83():111-24. PubMed ID: 26253423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Longitudinal Predictive Control for Vehicle-Following Collision Avoidance in Autonomous Driving Considering Distance and Acceleration Compensation.
    Yin S; Yang C; Kawsar I; Du H; Pan Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 22(19):. PubMed ID: 36236493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How do drivers avoid collisions? A driving simulator-based study.
    Li X; Rakotonirainy A; Yan X
    J Safety Res; 2019 Sep; 70():89-96. PubMed ID: 31848013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. At what cost? How planned collisions with pedestrians may save lives.
    Robinson MD; Beal CE; Brennan SN
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Jun; 141():105492. PubMed ID: 32305618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.