155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25098163)
1. Impressionless implant-supported restorations with Cerec 4.2.
Rauscher O
Int J Comput Dent; 2014; 17(2):159-68. PubMed ID: 25098163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of prefabricated titanium abutments and customized anatomic lithium disilicate structures for cement-retained implant restorations in the esthetic zone.
Lin WS; Harris BT; Zandinejad A; Martin WC; Morton D
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Mar; 111(3):181-5. PubMed ID: 24360007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A simplified approach to implant restorations using innovative digital technology.
Brooks JH; Wicks RA; Hottel TL
J Tenn Dent Assoc; 2014; 94(2):41-4; quiz 45-6. PubMed ID: 25842466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The use of a scannable impression coping and digital impression technique to fabricate a customized anatomic abutment and zirconia restoration in the esthetic zone.
Lin WS; Harris BT; Morton D
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):187-91. PubMed ID: 23522368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with CAD/CAM-fabricated porcelain crown and zirconia-based framework.
Takaba M; Tanaka S; Ishiura Y; Baba K
J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):402-7. PubMed ID: 23289495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impression-free implant restorations with Cerec InLab.
Rauscher O
Int J Comput Dent; 2011; 14(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 21877380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use of CAD/CAM technology to fabricate a custom ceramic implant abutment: a clinical report.
Bertolini Mde M; Kempen J; Lourenço EJ; Telles Dde M
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 May; 111(5):362-6. PubMed ID: 24433839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM
J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fracture Strength of Zirconia and Alumina Ceramic Crowns Supported by Implants.
Traini T; Sorrentino R; Gherlone E; Perfetti F; Bollero P; Zarone F
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jul; 41 Spec No():352-9. PubMed ID: 24779915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fracture load of monolithic CAD/CAM lithium disilicate ceramic crowns and veneered zirconia crowns as a posterior implant restoration.
Kim JH; Lee SJ; Park JS; Ryu JJ
Implant Dent; 2013 Feb; 22(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 23296031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.
Sailer I; Sailer T; Stawarczyk B; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):850-8. PubMed ID: 19865625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of platform connection and abutment material on stress distribution in single anterior implant-supported restorations: a nonlinear 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Carvalho MA; Sotto-Maior BS; Del Bel Cury AA; Pessanha Henriques GE
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1096-102. PubMed ID: 24831744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The rehabilitation of an edentulous mandible with a CAD/CAM zirconia framework and heat-pressed lithium disilicate ceramic crowns: a clinical report.
Cho Y; Raigrodski AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jun; 111(6):443-7. PubMed ID: 24602417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Immediate provisionalization with a CAD/CAM interim abutment and crown: a guided soft tissue healing technique.
Proussaefs P
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Feb; 113(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 25438739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fracture Strength of Monolithic All-Ceramic Crowns on Titanium Implant Abutments.
Weyhrauch M; Igiel C; Scheller H; Weibrich G; Lehmann KM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(2):304-9. PubMed ID: 27004277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A novel approach to implant screw-retained restorations: adhesive combination between zirconia frameworks and monolithic lithium disilicate.
Fabbri G; Sorrentino R; Brennan M; Cerutti A
Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(4):490-505. PubMed ID: 25289384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of abutment material on the gingival color of implant-supported all-ceramic restorations: a prospective multicenter study.
Bressan E; Paniz G; Lops D; Corazza B; Romeo E; Favero G
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Jun; 22(6):631-7. PubMed ID: 21070378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutment with a commercially fabricated CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutment.
Protopapadaki M; Monaco EA; Kim HI; Davis EL
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):389-96. PubMed ID: 24011801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro performance of implant-supported monolithic zirconia crowns: Influence of patient-specific tooth-coloured abutments with titanium adhesive bases.
Rosentritt M; Rembs A; Behr M; Hahnel S; Preis V
J Dent; 2015 Jul; 43(7):839-45. PubMed ID: 25953721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fracture force of tooth-tooth- and implant-tooth-supported all-ceramic fixed partial dentures using titanium vs. customised zirconia implant abutments.
Kolbeck C; Behr M; Rosentritt M; Handel G
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1049-53. PubMed ID: 18707604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
