121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25098710)
1. Minimum 5-year follow-up of 1138 consecutive laparoscopic radical prostatectomies.
Soares R; Di Benedetto A; Dovey Z; Bott S; McGregor RG; Eden CG
BJU Int; 2015 Apr; 115(4):546-53. PubMed ID: 25098710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer.
Di Benedetto A; Soares R; Dovey Z; Bott S; McGregor RG; Eden CG
BJU Int; 2015 May; 115(5):780-6. PubMed ID: 24802619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term oncological and continence outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single-centre experience.
Busch J; Stephan C; Herold A; Erber B; Kempkensteffen C; Hinz S; Lein M; Weikert S; Miller K; Magheli A
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt C):E985-90. PubMed ID: 22672442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The learning curve for laparoscopic extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer: implications for compliance with existing guidelines.
Eden CG; Zacharakis E; Bott S
BJU Int; 2013 Aug; 112(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 23419154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy - results of 200 consecutive cases in a Canadian medical institution.
Tse E; Knaus R
Can J Urol; 2004 Apr; 11(2):2172-85. PubMed ID: 15182406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.
Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of required nodal yield in a high risk cohort undergoing extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy and its impact on functional outcomes.
Sagalovich D; Calaway A; Srivastava A; Sooriakumaran P; Tewari AK
BJU Int; 2013 Jan; 111(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 22823452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Standardized comparison of robot-assisted limited and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer.
Yuh BE; Ruel NH; Mejia R; Novara G; Wilson TG
BJU Int; 2013 Jul; 112(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 23351148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The first 1000 cases of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in the UK: evidence of multiple 'learning curves'.
Eden CG; Neill MG; Louie-Johnsun MW
BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(9):1224-30. PubMed ID: 19021612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Operative details and oncological and functional outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up.
Murphy DG; Kerger M; Crowe H; Peters JS; Costello AJ
Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):1358-66. PubMed ID: 19147274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Hruza M; Bermejo JL; Flinspach B; Schulze M; Teber D; Rumpelt HJ; Rassweiler JJ
BJU Int; 2013 Feb; 111(2):271-80. PubMed ID: 22757970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biochemical recurrence-free survival after robotic-assisted laparoscopic vs open radical prostatectomy for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer.
Ritch CR; You C; May AT; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Penson DF; Chang SS; Cookson MS; Smith JA; Barocas DA
Urology; 2014 Jun; 83(6):1309-15. PubMed ID: 24746665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of prostate gland weight in robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Link BA; Nelson R; Josephson DY; Yoshida JS; Crocitto LE; Kawachi MH; Wilson TG
J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):928-32. PubMed ID: 18635217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Limited pelvic lymph node dissection does not improve biochemical relapse-free survival at 10 years after radical prostatectomy in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.
Weight CJ; Reuther AM; Gunn PW; Zippe CR; Dhar NB; Klein EA
Urology; 2008 Jan; 71(1):141-5. PubMed ID: 18242383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Selective versus standard ligature of the deep venous complex during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: effects on continence, blood loss, and margin status.
Porpiglia F; Fiori C; Grande S; Morra I; Scarpa RM
Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):1377-83. PubMed ID: 19243886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. No difference in six-year biochemical failure rates with or without pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in low-risk patients with localized prostate cancer.
Bhatta-Dhar N; Reuther AM; Zippe C; Klein EA
Urology; 2004 Mar; 63(3):528-31. PubMed ID: 15028451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cancer control, continence, and potency after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy beyond the learning and discovery curves.
Eden CG; Arora A; Hutton A
J Endourol; 2011 May; 25(5):815-9. PubMed ID: 21510804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in the Korean population: a 5-year propensity-score matched comparative analysis versus open radical prostatectomy.
Koo KC; Tuliao P; Yoon YE; Chung BH; Hong SJ; Yang SC; Rha KH
Int J Urol; 2014 Aug; 21(8):781-5. PubMed ID: 24661241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy on clinical T3 prostate cancer: experience of a single centre with long-term follow-up.
Gözen AS; Akin Y; Ates M; Hruza M; Rassweiler J
BJU Int; 2015 Jul; 116(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 24571244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection, laparoscopically assisted seminal vesicle mobilization, and total perineal prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Teichman JM; Reddy PK; Hulbert JC
Urology; 1995 May; 45(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 7538244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
