949 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25099400)
1. Reinforced active middle ear implant fixation in incus vibroplasty.
Mlynski R; Dalhoff E; Heyd A; Wildenstein D; Hagen R; Gummer AW; Schraven SP
Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 25099400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Coupling of an active middle-ear implant to the long process of the incus using an elastic clip attachment.
Schraven SP; Mlynski R; Dalhoff E; Heyd A; Wildenstein D; Rak K; Radeloff A; Hagen R; Gummer AW
Hear Res; 2016 Oct; 340():179-184. PubMed ID: 27037037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Standardized Active Middle-Ear Implant Coupling to the Short Incus Process.
Mlynski R; Dalhoff E; Heyd A; Wildenstein D; Rak K; Radeloff A; Hagen R; Gummer AW; Schraven SP
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Sep; 36(8):1390-8. PubMed ID: 26247138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative study of MED-EL FMT attachment to the long process of the incus in intact middle ears and its attachment to disarticulated stapes head.
Chen T; Ren LJ; Yin DM; Li J; Yang L; Dai PD; Zhang TY
Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():97-103. PubMed ID: 28666703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Alternative fixation of an active middle ear implant at the short incus process.
Schraven SP; Dalhoff E; Wildenstein D; Hagen R; Gummer AW; Mlynski R
Audiol Neurootol; 2014; 19(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 24192762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Alternative Coupling Methods of the Vibrant Soundbridge Floating Mass Transducer.
Busch S; Lenarz T; Maier H
Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21(6):347-355. PubMed ID: 28068651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does Coupling and Positioning in Vibroplasty Matter? A Prospective Cohort Study.
Marino R; Lampacher P; Dittrich G; Tavora-Vieira D; Kuthubutheen J; Rajan GP
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Aug; 36(7):1223-30. PubMed ID: 26075675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vibroplasty in mixed and conductive hearing loss: comparison of different coupling methods.
Vyskocil E; Riss D; Honeder C; Arnoldner C; Hamzavi JS; Baumgartner WD; Flak S; Gstoettner W
Laryngoscope; 2014 Jun; 124(6):1436-43. PubMed ID: 24338550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electrocochleography in round window Vibrant Soundbridge implantation.
Colletti V; Mandalà M; Colletti L
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Apr; 146(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 22140205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Consensus statement on round window vibroplasty.
Beltrame AM; Todt I; Sprinzl G; Profant M; Schwab B
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2014 Oct; 123(10):734-40. PubMed ID: 24842869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Oval window membrane vibroplasty for direct acoustic cochlear stimulation: treating severe mixed hearing loss in challenging middle ears.
Schwab B; Salcher RB; Maier H; Kontorinis G
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jul; 33(5):804-9. PubMed ID: 22699990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The active middle ear implant for the rehabilitation of sensorineural, mixed and conductive hearing losses].
Sprinzl GM; Wolf-Magele A; Schnabl J; Koci V
Laryngorhinootologie; 2011 Sep; 90(9):560-72. PubMed ID: 21913153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of static force on round window stimulation with the direct acoustic cochlea stimulator.
Maier H; Salcher R; Schwab B; Lenarz T
Hear Res; 2013 Jul; 301():115-24. PubMed ID: 23276731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clip vibroplasty: experimental evaluation and first clinical results.
Hüttenbrink KB; Beutner D; Bornitz M; Luers JC; Zahnert T
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jun; 32(4):650-3. PubMed ID: 21765388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The floating mass transducer of the Vibrant Soundbridge interposed between the stapes and tympanic membrane after incus necrosis.
Cremers CW; Verhaegen VJ; Snik AF
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jan; 30(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 18957899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A retrospective European multicenter analysis of the functional outcomes after active middle ear implant surgery using the third generation vibroplasty couplers.
Rahne T; Skarzynski PH; Hagen R; Radeloff A; Lassaletta L; Barbara M; Plontke SK; Mlynski R
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Jan; 278(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 32451668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electrocochleographic and mechanical assessment of round window stimulation with an active middle ear prosthesis.
Koka K; Holland NJ; Lupo JE; Jenkins HA; Tollin DJ
Hear Res; 2010 May; 263(1-2):128-37. PubMed ID: 19720125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A New Stapes-Head Coupler for the Vibrant Soundbridge System.
Warnholtz B; Schär M; Cuny P; Sonntag K; Beutner D; Dobrev I; Röösli C; Sim JH
Audiol Neurootol; 2021; 26(4):287-294. PubMed ID: 33647905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Treatment of the atretic ear with round window vibrant soundbridge implantation in infants and children: electrocochleography and audiologic outcomes.
Mandalà M; Colletti L; Colletti V
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Oct; 32(8):1250-5. PubMed ID: 21897320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Round window stimulation with the floating mass transducer at constant pretension.
Salcher R; Schwab B; Lenarz T; Maier H
Hear Res; 2014 Aug; 314():1-9. PubMed ID: 24727490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
