949 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25099400)
21. Experience with vibroplasty couplers at the stapes head and footplate.
Beleites T; Neudert M; Beutner D; Hüttenbrink KB; Zahnert T
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Dec; 32(9):1468-72. PubMed ID: 22072259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Functional results of Vibrant Soundbridge middle ear implants in conductive and mixed hearing losses.
Bernardeschi D; Hoffman C; Benchaa T; Labassi S; Beliaeff M; Sterkers O; Grayeli AB
Audiol Neurootol; 2011; 16(6):381-7. PubMed ID: 21228566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Benefits of active middle ear implants in mixed hearing loss: Stapes versus round window.
Lee JM; Jung J; Moon IS; Kim SH; Choi JY
Laryngoscope; 2017 Jun; 127(6):1435-1441. PubMed ID: 27560038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Our auditory results using the Vibrant Soundbridge on the long process of the incus: 20 years of data.
Grégoire A; Van Damme JP; Gilain C; Bihin B; Garin P
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2018 Feb; 45(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 28285827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Mechanical Energy Dissipation Through the Ossicular Chain and Inner Ear Using Laser Doppler Vibrometer Measurement of Round Window Velocity.
Ryan M; Lally J; Adams JK; Higgins S; Ahmed M; Aden J; Esquivel C; Spear SA
Otol Neurotol; 2020 Mar; 41(3):e387-e391. PubMed ID: 31821262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The Hannover Coupler: Controlled Static Prestress in Round Window Stimulation With the Floating Mass Transducer.
Müller M; Salcher R; Lenarz T; Maier H
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Sep; 38(8):1186-1192. PubMed ID: 28657955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Influence of the Coupling on the Hearing Outcome After Implantation of an Active Middle Ear Implant: Comparison of the Transmission Behavior in Temporal Bone Experiments With Clinical Data.
Müller C; Lailach S; Bornitz M; Lasurashvili N; Essinger TM; Neudert M; Zahnert T
Ear Hear; 2023 Jan-Feb 01; 44(1):135-145. PubMed ID: 35913925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Surgical Impact of Coupling an Active Middle Ear Implant to Short Incus Process.
Schraven SP; Rak K; Cebulla M; Radeloff A; Grossmann W; Hagen R; Mlynski R
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Jul; 39(6):688-692. PubMed ID: 29879088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. How does prosthesis head size affect vibration transmission in ossiculoplasty?
Bance M; Campos A; Wong L; Morris DP; van Wijhe R
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Jul; 137(1):70-3. PubMed ID: 17599568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Vibroplasty combined with tympanic membrane reconstruction in middle ear ventilation disorders.
Müller C; Zahnert T; Ossmann S; Neudert M; Bornitz M
Hear Res; 2019 Jul; 378():166-175. PubMed ID: 30878272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Historical overview and surgical applications of the Vibrant Soundbridge active middle ear implant].
Tóth T; Gerlinger I; Bölcsföldi TB; Kellényi G; Németh A; Papp I; Szanyi I
Orv Hetil; 2021 Oct; 162(40):1619-1626. PubMed ID: 34601459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Impact of floating mass transducer coupling and positioning in round window vibroplasty.
Rajan GP; Lampacher P; Ambett R; Dittrich G; Kuthubutheen J; Wood B; McArthur A; Marino R
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Feb; 32(2):271-7. PubMed ID: 21206391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Incus footplate assembly: Indication and surgical outcome.
Park M; Han S; Choi BY; Chang SO; Kim CS; Koo JW
Laryngoscope; 2016 Nov; 126(11):2569-2573. PubMed ID: 26863914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Application of active middle ear implants in patients with severe mixed hearing loss.
Verhaegen VJ; Mulder JJ; Cremers CW; Snik AF
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 22366752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison between incus short process and long process coupling of the vibrant soundbridge in human temporal bones.
Graf L; Lochner J; Mojallal H; Arnold A; Honegger F; Stieger C
Int J Audiol; 2023 Feb; 62(2):192-198. PubMed ID: 35174741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Techniques to improve the efficiency of a middle ear implant: effect of different methods of coupling to the ossicular chain.
Devèze A; Koka K; Tringali S; Jenkins HA; Tollin DJ
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jan; 34(1):158-66. PubMed ID: 23196747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Results of VSB implantation at the short process of the incus in children with ear atresia.
Célérier C; Thierry B; Coudert C; Blanchard M; Loundon N; Garabédian EN; Denoyelle F
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Feb; 93():83-87. PubMed ID: 28109505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Active middle ear implants in patients undergoing subtotal petrosectomy: long-term follow-up.
Henseler MA; Polanski JF; Schlegel C; Linder T
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Mar; 35(3):437-41. PubMed ID: 24492140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Presentation of floating mass transducer and Vibroplasty couplers on CT and cone beam CT.
Mlynski R; Nguyen TD; Plontke SK; Kösling S
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Apr; 271(4):665-72. PubMed ID: 23529745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prosthetic reconstruction from the tympanic membrane to the stapes head or to the stapes footplate? A laser Doppler study.
Alian WA; Majdalawieh OF; Van Wijhe RG; Ejnell H; Bance M
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Apr; 41(2):84-93. PubMed ID: 22569008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
