These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25099476)

  • 1. Vascular response to drug-eluting stent with biodegradable vs. durable polymer. Optical coherence tomography substudy of the NEXT.
    Kubo T; Akasaka T; Kozuma K; Kimura K; Fusazaki T; Okura H; Shinke T; Ino Y; Hasegawa T; Takashima H; Takamisawa I; Yamaguchi H; Igarashi K; Kadota K; Tanabe K; Nakagawa Y; Muramatsu T; Morino Y; Kimura T;
    Circ J; 2014; 78(10):2408-14. PubMed ID: 25099476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two-year vascular responses to drug-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer versus durable polymer: An optical coherence tomography sub-study of the NEXT.
    Katayama Y; Kubo T; Akasaka T; Ino Y; Kimura K; Okura H; Shinke T; Igarashi K; Kadota K; Kozuma K; Tanabe K; Nakagawa Y; Muramatsu T; Morino Y; Kimura T;
    J Cardiol; 2017 Dec; 70(6):530-536. PubMed ID: 28536015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vascular response to everolimus- and biolimus-eluting coronary stents versus everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds--an optical coherence tomography substudy of the EVERBIO II trial.
    Kallinikou Z; Arroyo D; Togni M; Lehman S; Corpataux N; Cook M; Müller O; Baeriswyl G; Stauffer JC; Goy JJ; Puricel SG; Cook S
    Swiss Med Wkly; 2016; 146():w14274. PubMed ID: 26766027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: Final 5-Year Report From the COMPARE II Trial (Abluminal Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent).
    Vlachojannis GJ; Smits PC; Hofma SH; Togni M; Vázquez N; Valdés M; Voudris V; Slagboom T; Goy JJ; den Heijer P; van der Ent M
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jun; 10(12):1215-1221. PubMed ID: 28579236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vascular response to bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent vs. permanent polymer everolimus-eluting stent at 9-month follow-up: an optical coherence tomography sub-study from the CENTURY II trial.
    Kuramitsu S; Kazuno Y; Sonoda S; Domei T; Jinnouchi H; Yamaji K; Soga Y; Shirai S; Ando K; Saito S
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jan; 17(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 26333375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Randomized comparison of biolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer versus everolimus-eluting stents with permanent polymer coatings assessed by optical coherence tomography.
    Tada T; Kastrati A; Byrne RA; Schuster T; Cuni R; King LA; Cassese S; Joner M; Pache J; Massberg S; Schömig A; Mehilli J
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Mar; 30(3):495-504. PubMed ID: 24452729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of long-term in-stent vascular response between abluminal groove-filled biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent and durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent: 3-year OCT follow-up from the TARGET I trial.
    Xu B; Zhang YJ; Sun ZW; Qiao SB; Chen SL; Zhang RY; Pan DR; Pang S; Zhang Q; Xu L; Yang YJ; Leon MB; Gao RL
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Dec; 31(8):1489-96. PubMed ID: 26208685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Final 3-Year Outcome of a Randomized Trial Comparing Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents Using Either Biodegradable Polymer or Durable Polymer: NOBORI Biolimus-Eluting Versus XIENCE/PROMUS Everolimus-Eluting Stent Trial.
    Natsuaki M; Kozuma K; Morimoto T; Kadota K; Muramatsu T; Nakagawa Y; Akasaka T; Igarashi K; Tanabe K; Morino Y; Ishikawa T; Nishikawa H; Awata M; Abe M; Okada H; Takatsu Y; Ogata N; Kimura K; Urasawa K; Tarutani Y; Shiode N; Kimura T
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Oct; 8(10):. PubMed ID: 26446596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. STACCATO (Assessment of Stent sTrut Apposition and Coverage in Coronary ArTeries with Optical coherence tomography in patients with STEMI, NSTEMI and stable/unstable angina undergoing everolimus vs. biolimus A9-eluting stent implantation): a randomised controlled trial.
    Adriaenssens T; Ughi GJ; Dubois C; De Cock D; Onsea K; Bennett J; Wiyono S; Sinnaeve P; Coosemans M; Ferdinande B; Belmans A; D'hooge J; Desmet W
    EuroIntervention; 2016 Apr; 11(14):e1619-26. PubMed ID: 25420791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Early vascular healing with rapid breakdown biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents assessed by optical coherence tomography.
    Tada T; Byrne RA; Schuster T; Cuni R; Kitabata H; Tiroch K; Dirninger A; Gratze F; Kaspar K; Zenker G; Joner M; Schömig A; Kastrati A
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2013; 14(2):84-9. PubMed ID: 23352095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biolimus-eluting versus everolimus-eluting stents in coronary artery disease: a pooled analysis from the NEXT (NOBORI biolimus-eluting versus XIENCE/PROMUS everolimus-eluting stent) and COMPARE II (Abluminal biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent) randomised trials.
    Vlachojannis GJ; Puricel S; Natsuaki M; Morimoto T; Smits PC; Kimura T
    EuroIntervention; 2017 Mar; 12(16):1970-1977. PubMed ID: 27802927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent: a randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial.
    Natsuaki M; Kozuma K; Morimoto T; Kadota K; Muramatsu T; Nakagawa Y; Akasaka T; Igarashi K; Tanabe K; Morino Y; Ishikawa T; Nishikawa H; Awata M; Abe M; Okada H; Takatsu Y; Ogata N; Kimura K; Urasawa K; Tarutani Y; Shiode N; Kimura T;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Jul; 62(3):181-190. PubMed ID: 23684673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The REMEDEE-OCT Study: An Evaluation of the Bioengineered COMBO Dual-Therapy CD34 Antibody-Covered Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent Compared With a Cobalt-Chromium Everolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights From Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging Analysis.
    Jaguszewski M; Aloysius R; Wang W; Bezerra HG; Hill J; De Winter RJ; Karjalainen PP; Verheye S; Wijns W; Lüscher TF; Joner M; Costa M; Landmesser U
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Mar; 10(5):489-499. PubMed ID: 28279316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optical coherence tomography findings: insights from the "randomised multicentre trial investigating angiographic outcomes of hybrid sirolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer compared with everolimus-eluting stents with durable polymer in chronic total occlusions" (PRISON IV) trial.
    Teeuwen K; Spoormans EM; Bennett J; Dubois C; Desmet W; Ughi GJ; Belmans A; Kelder JC; Tijssen JGP; Agostoni P; Suttorp MJ; Adriaenssens T
    EuroIntervention; 2017 Aug; 13(5):e522-e530. PubMed ID: 28512069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Randomised comparison of vascular response to biodegradable polymer sirolimus eluting and permanent polymer everolimus eluting stents: An optical coherence tomography study.
    Koppara T; Tada T; Xhepa E; Kufner S; Byrne RA; Ibrahim T; Laugwitz KL; Kastrati A; Joner M
    Int J Cardiol; 2018 May; 258():42-49. PubMed ID: 29544956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical outcomes of biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting BioMatrix stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting Xience stents.
    Lee DH; Park TK; Song YB; Chun WJ; Choi RK; Jeong JO; Im ES; Kim SW; Lee JM; Yang JH; Hahn JY; Choi SH; Choi JH; Lee SH; Gwon HC
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0183079. PubMed ID: 28797113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with acute coronary syndrome - the Activity of Platelets after Inhibition and Cardiovascular Events: Optical Coherence Tomography (APICE OCT) study.
    Chieffo A; Buchanan GL; Parodi G; Versaci F; Bianchi RM; Valenti R; Saccà S; Mongiardo A; Span S; Migliorini A; Spaccarotella C; Reimers B; Antoniucci D; Indolfi C; Ferrari A; Maehara A; Mintz GS; Colombo A
    EuroIntervention; 2014 Dec; 10(8):916-23. PubMed ID: 24974806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term coronary arterial response to biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents in comparison with durable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents and bare-metal stents: five-year follow-up optical coherence tomography study.
    Kuramitsu S; Sonoda S; Yokoi H; Iwabuchi M; Nishizaki Y; Shinozaki T; Domei T; Hyodo M; Inoue K; Shirai S; Ando K; Nobuyoshi M
    Atherosclerosis; 2014 Nov; 237(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 25190308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of neointimal coverage between ultrathin biodegradable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stents and durable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stents: 6 months optical coherence tomography follow-up from the TAXCO study.
    Abhyankar A; Abizaid A; Chamié D; Rathod M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Feb; 97(3):423-430. PubMed ID: 32243050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. One-year head to head comparison of the neointimal response between sirolimus eluting stent with reservoir technology and everolimus eluting stent: an optical coherence tomography study.
    Shiratori Y; Brugaletta S; Alvarez-Contreras L; Azpeitia Y; Ospino N; Gaido S; Delahanty A; Santos A; Martin-Yuste V; Masotti M; Serruys PW; Windecker S; Sabaté M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Oct; 82(4):E428-36. PubMed ID: 23441068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.