These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25099811)

  • 1. Multi-scale ensemble modeling of modular proteins with intrinsically disordered linker regions: application to p53.
    Terakawa T; Higo J; Takada S
    Biophys J; 2014 Aug; 107(3):721-729. PubMed ID: 25099811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiscale ensemble modeling of intrinsically disordered proteins: p53 N-terminal domain.
    Terakawa T; Takada S
    Biophys J; 2011 Sep; 101(6):1450-8. PubMed ID: 21943426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Molecular Dynamics Simulations Combined with Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and/or Small-Angle X-ray Scattering Data for Characterizing Intrinsically Disordered Protein Conformational Ensembles.
    Chan-Yao-Chong M; Durand D; Ha-Duong T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 May; 59(5):1743-1758. PubMed ID: 30840442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical accuracy of molecular dynamics-based methods for sampling conformational ensembles of disordered proteins.
    Bastida A; Zúñiga J; Fogolari F; Soler MA
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2024 Sep; 26(35):23213-23227. PubMed ID: 39190324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rational design using sequence information only produces a peptide that binds to the intrinsically disordered region of p53.
    Kamagata K; Mano E; Itoh Y; Wakamoto T; Kitahara R; Kanbayashi S; Takahashi H; Murata A; Kameda T
    Sci Rep; 2019 Jun; 9(1):8584. PubMed ID: 31253862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combination of coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations and small-angle X-ray scattering experiments.
    Ekimoto T; Kokabu Y; Oroguchi T; Ikeguchi M
    Biophys Physicobiol; 2019; 16():377-390. PubMed ID: 31984192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multimodal Structural Distribution of the p53 C-Terminal Domain upon Binding to S100B via a Generalized Ensemble Method: From Disorder to Extradisorder.
    Iida S; Kawabata T; Kasahara K; Nakamura H; Higo J
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Apr; 15(4):2597-2607. PubMed ID: 30855964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New force field on modeling intrinsically disordered proteins.
    Wang W; Ye W; Jiang C; Luo R; Chen HF
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2014 Sep; 84(3):253-69. PubMed ID: 24589355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exploring the Role of Globular Domain Locations on an Intrinsically Disordered Region of p53: A Molecular Dynamics Investigation.
    Bakker MJ; Sørensen HV; Skepö M
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2024 Feb; 20(3):1423-1433. PubMed ID: 38230670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phosphorylation Regulates the Bound Structure of an Intrinsically Disordered Protein: The p53-TAZ2 Case.
    Ithuralde RE; Turjanski AG
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0144284. PubMed ID: 26742101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Atomistic detailed free-energy landscape of intrinsically disordered protein studied by multi-scale divide-and-conquer molecular dynamics simulation.
    Shimoyama H; Yonezawa Y
    J Comput Chem; 2021 Jan; 42(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 33030249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Residual Structures and Transient Long-Range Interactions of p53 Transactivation Domain: Assessment of Explicit Solvent Protein Force Fields.
    Liu X; Chen J
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Aug; 15(8):4708-4720. PubMed ID: 31241933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian inference of protein ensembles from SAXS data.
    Antonov LD; Olsson S; Boomsma W; Hamelryck T
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 Feb; 18(8):5832-8. PubMed ID: 26548662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Structural Characterization of N-WASP Domain V Using MD Simulations with NMR and SAXS Data.
    Chan-Yao-Chong M; Deville C; Pinet L; van Heijenoort C; Durand D; Ha-Duong T
    Biophys J; 2019 Apr; 116(7):1216-1227. PubMed ID: 30878202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. SAXS-Restrained Ensemble Simulations of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins with Commitment to the Principle of Maximum Entropy.
    Hermann MR; Hub JS
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Sep; 15(9):5103-5115. PubMed ID: 31402649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Generation of the configurational ensemble of an intrinsically disordered protein from unbiased molecular dynamics simulation.
    Shrestha UR; Juneja P; Zhang Q; Gurumoorthy V; Borreguero JM; Urban V; Cheng X; Pingali SV; Smith JC; O'Neill HM; Petridis L
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Oct; 116(41):20446-20452. PubMed ID: 31548393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of Charge-Augmented Three-Point Water Model (CAIPi3P) for Accurate Simulations of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
    de Souza JV; Zariquiey FS; Bronowska AK
    Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Aug; 21(17):. PubMed ID: 32859072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hybrid Methods for Modeling Protein Structures Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Small-Angle X-Ray Scattering Data.
    Ekimoto T; Ikeguchi M
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2018; 1105():237-258. PubMed ID: 30617833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative prediction of ensemble dynamics, shapes and contact propensities of intrinsically disordered proteins.
    Yu L; Brüschweiler R
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2022 Sep; 18(9):e1010036. PubMed ID: 36084124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Structure of tumor suppressor p53 and its intrinsically disordered N-terminal transactivation domain.
    Wells M; Tidow H; Rutherford TJ; Markwick P; Jensen MR; Mylonas E; Svergun DI; Blackledge M; Fersht AR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Apr; 105(15):5762-7. PubMed ID: 18391200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.