BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25100690)

  • 1. Collective defence portfolios of ant hosts shift with social parasite pressure.
    Jongepier E; Kleeberg I; Job S; Foitzik S
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Sep; 281(1791):20140225. PubMed ID: 25100690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ant behaviour and brain gene expression of defending hosts depend on the ecological success of the intruding social parasite.
    Kaur R; Stoldt M; Jongepier E; Feldmeyer B; Menzel F; Bornberg-Bauer E; Foitzik S
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2019 Apr; 374(1769):20180192. PubMed ID: 30967075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The ecological success of a social parasite increases with manipulation of collective host behaviour.
    Jongepier E; Kleeberg I; Foitzik S
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Dec; 28(12):2152-62. PubMed ID: 26299653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cuckoos versus hosts in insects and birds: adaptations, counter-adaptations and outcomes.
    Kilner RM; Langmore NE
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2011 Nov; 86(4):836-52. PubMed ID: 21223481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Raiders from the sky: slavemaker founding queens select for aggressive host colonies.
    Pamminger T; Modlmeier AP; Suette S; Pennings PS; Foitzik S
    Biol Lett; 2012 Oct; 8(5):748-50. PubMed ID: 22809720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A chemical level in the coevolutionary arms race between an ant social parasite and its hosts.
    Brandt M; Heinze J; Schmitt T; Foitzik S
    J Evol Biol; 2005 May; 18(3):576-86. PubMed ID: 15842487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. First evidence for slave rebellion: enslaved ant workers systematically kill the brood of their social parasite protomognathus americanus.
    Achenbach A; Foitzik S
    Evolution; 2009 Apr; 63(4):1068-75. PubMed ID: 19243573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Locally adapted social parasite affects density, social structure, and life history of its ant hosts.
    Foitzik S; Achenbach A; Brandt M
    Ecology; 2009 May; 90(5):1195-206. PubMed ID: 19537541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The parasite's long arm: a tapeworm parasite induces behavioural changes in uninfected group members of its social host.
    Beros S; Jongepier E; Hagemeier F; Foitzik S
    Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Nov; 282(1819):. PubMed ID: 26582019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The possible role of ant larvae in the defence against social parasites.
    Pulliainen U; Helanterä H; Sundström L; Schultner E
    Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Mar; 286(1898):20182867. PubMed ID: 30836870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of space and time on the evolution of altruistic defence: the case of ant slave rebellion.
    Metzler D; Jordan F; Pamminger T; Foitzik S
    J Evol Biol; 2016 May; 29(5):874-86. PubMed ID: 26873305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Coevolution in host-parasite systems: behavioural strategies of slave-making ants and their hosts.
    Foitzik S; DeHeer CJ; Hunjan DN; Herbers JM
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Jun; 268(1472):1139-46. PubMed ID: 11375101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Insect societies fight back: the evolution of defensive traits against social parasites.
    Grüter C; Jongepier E; Foitzik S
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2018 Jul; 373(1751):. PubMed ID: 29866913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Colony structure of a slavemaking ant. II. Frequency of slave raids and impact on the host population.
    Foitzik S; Herbers JM
    Evolution; 2001 Feb; 55(2):316-23. PubMed ID: 11308089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial structure and nest demography reveal the influence of competition, parasitism and habitat quality on slavemaking ants and their hosts.
    Scharf I; Fischer-Blass B; Foitzik S
    BMC Ecol; 2011 Mar; 11():9. PubMed ID: 21443778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative analyses of co-evolving host-parasite associations reveal unique gene expression patterns underlying slavemaker raiding and host defensive phenotypes.
    Alleman A; Feldmeyer B; Foitzik S
    Sci Rep; 2018 Jan; 8(1):1951. PubMed ID: 29386535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Species-specific genes under selection characterize the co-evolution of slavemaker and host lifestyles.
    Feldmeyer B; Elsner D; Alleman A; Foitzik S
    BMC Evol Biol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):237. PubMed ID: 29202686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Increased host aggression as an induced defense against slave-making ants.
    Pamminger T; Scharf I; Pennings PS; Foitzik S
    Behav Ecol; 2011 Mar; 22(2):255-260. PubMed ID: 22476194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do well-integrated species of an inquiline community have a lower brood predation tendency? A test using red wood ant myrmecophiles.
    Parmentier T; Dekoninck W; Wenseleers T
    BMC Evol Biol; 2016 Jan; 16():12. PubMed ID: 26781178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do host species evolve a specific response to slave-making ants?
    Delattre O; Blatrix R; Châline N; Chameron S; Fédou A; Leroy C; Jaisson P
    Front Zool; 2012 Dec; 9(1):38. PubMed ID: 23276325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.