222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25100989)
1. Acute human brain responses to intracortical microelectrode arrays: challenges and future prospects.
Fernández E; Greger B; House PA; Aranda I; Botella C; Albisua J; Soto-Sánchez C; Alfaro A; Normann RA
Front Neuroeng; 2014; 7():24. PubMed ID: 25100989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Technology insight: future neuroprosthetic therapies for disorders of the nervous system.
Normann RA
Nat Clin Pract Neurol; 2007 Aug; 3(8):444-52. PubMed ID: 17671522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Failure mode analysis of silicon-based intracortical microelectrode arrays in non-human primates.
Barrese JC; Rao N; Paroo K; Triebwasser C; Vargas-Irwin C; Franquemont L; Donoghue JP
J Neural Eng; 2013 Dec; 10(6):066014. PubMed ID: 24216311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differential expression of genes involved in the chronic response to intracortical microelectrodes.
Song S; Druschel LN; Chan ER; Capadona JR
Acta Biomater; 2023 Oct; 169():348-362. PubMed ID: 37507031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ruthenium oxide based microelectrode arrays for in vitro and in vivo neural recording and stimulation.
Atmaramani R; Chakraborty B; Rihani RT; Usoro J; Hammack A; Abbott J; Nnoromele P; Black BJ; Pancrazio JJ; Cogan SF
Acta Biomater; 2020 Jan; 101():565-574. PubMed ID: 31678740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Configuring intracortical microelectrode arrays and stimulus parameters to minimize neuron loss during prolonged intracortical electrical stimulation.
McCreery D; Han M; Pikov V; Miller C
Brain Stimul; 2021; 14(6):1553-1562. PubMed ID: 34678487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Neuropathological effects of chronically implanted, intracortical microelectrodes in a tetraplegic patient.
Szymanski LJ; Kellis S; Liu CY; Jones KT; Andersen RA; Commins D; Lee B; McCreery DB; Miller CA
J Neural Eng; 2021 Jul; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 34314384
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimization of microelectrode design for cortical recording based on thermal noise considerations.
Lempka SF; Johnson MD; Barnett DW; Moffitt MA; Otto KJ; Kipke DR; McIntyre CC
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():3361-4. PubMed ID: 17947023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Toward a comparison of microelectrodes for acute and chronic recordings.
Ward MP; Rajdev P; Ellison C; Irazoqui PP
Brain Res; 2009 Jul; 1282():183-200. PubMed ID: 19486899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Targeting CD14 on blood derived cells improves intracortical microelectrode performance.
Bedell HW; Hermann JK; Ravikumar M; Lin S; Rein A; Li X; Molinich E; Smith PD; Selkirk SM; Miller RH; Sidik S; Taylor DM; Capadona JR
Biomaterials; 2018 May; 163():163-173. PubMed ID: 29471127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biocompatibility of intracortical microelectrodes: current status and future prospects.
Marin C; Fernández E
Front Neuroeng; 2010; 3():8. PubMed ID: 20577634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laser ablation of the pia mater for insertion of high-density microelectrode arrays in a translational sheep model.
Boergens KM; Tadić A; Hopper MS; McNamara I; Fell D; Sahasrabuddhe K; Kong Y; Straka M; Sohal HS; Angle MR
J Neural Eng; 2021 Jun; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 34038875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Neural control of cursor trajectory and click by a human with tetraplegia 1000 days after implant of an intracortical microelectrode array.
Simeral JD; Kim SP; Black MJ; Donoghue JP; Hochberg LR
J Neural Eng; 2011 Apr; 8(2):025027. PubMed ID: 21436513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. BBB leakage, astrogliosis, and tissue loss correlate with silicon microelectrode array recording performance.
Nolta NF; Christensen MB; Crane PD; Skousen JL; Tresco PA
Biomaterials; 2015; 53():753-62. PubMed ID: 25890770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Progress towards biocompatible intracortical microelectrodes for neural interfacing applications.
Jorfi M; Skousen JL; Weder C; Capadona JR
J Neural Eng; 2015 Feb; 12(1):011001. PubMed ID: 25460808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Home Use of a Percutaneous Wireless Intracortical Brain-Computer Interface by Individuals With Tetraplegia.
Simeral JD; Hosman T; Saab J; Flesher SN; Vilela M; Franco B; Kelemen JN; Brandman DM; Ciancibello JG; Rezaii PG; Eskandar EN; Rosler DM; Shenoy KV; Henderson JM; Nurmikko AV; Hochberg LR
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2021 Jul; 68(7):2313-2325. PubMed ID: 33784612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Reconnecting the Hand and Arm with Brain (ReHAB) Commentary on "An Integrated Brain-Machine Interface Platform With Thousands of Channels".
Kirsch RF; Ajiboye AB; Miller JP
J Med Internet Res; 2019 Oct; 21(10):e16339. PubMed ID: 31674921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Silicon-substrate intracortical microelectrode arrays for long-term recording of neuronal spike activity in cerebral cortex.
Kipke DR; Vetter RJ; Williams JC; Hetke JF
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Jun; 11(2):151-5. PubMed ID: 12899260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the stability of intracortical microelectrode arrays.
Liu X; McCreery DB; Bullara LA; Agnew WF
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2006 Mar; 14(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 16562636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
