BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25101551)

  • 1. Response by Eric Suba to Sankaranarayanan et al.
    Suba EJ
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2014; 11(3):178-80. PubMed ID: 25101551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response to article titled "US-funded measurements of cervical cancer death rates in India: scientific and ethical concerns" by Eric J Suba.
    Sankaranarayanan R; Nene BM; Shastri S; Esmy PE; Rajkumar R; Muwonge R; Swaminathan R; Malvi SG; Kane S; Desai S; Kelkar R; Hingmire S; Jayant K
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2014; 11(3):175-8. PubMed ID: 25101550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. US-funded measurements of cervical cancer death rates in India: scientific and ethical concerns.
    Suba EJ
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2014; 11(3):167-75. PubMed ID: 25101547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of cervical cancer screening in Scandinavia.
    Day NE
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 May; 63(5):714-8. PubMed ID: 6717876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of screening for cancer in the Nordic countries on deaths, cost and quality of life up to the year 2017.
    Hristova L; Hakama M
    Acta Oncol; 1997; 36 Suppl 9():1-60. PubMed ID: 9143316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of a mass screening program on the risk of cervical cancer.
    Louhivuori K
    Cancer Detect Prev; 1991; 15(6):471-5. PubMed ID: 1782637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cervical cancer in Croatia: state of the art and possibilities for prevention.
    Znaor A; Strnad M
    Coll Antropol; 2007 Apr; 31 Suppl 2():37-40. PubMed ID: 17598503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing capabilities in India today and the role of "outside" opinions.
    Jayaram G; Dewar R; Raman R; Rajendiran S; Parkash V
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2014; 11(4):1-2. PubMed ID: 25377030
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of a federally funded cervical cancer screening program on reducing mortality in New Jersey.
    Miller ER; Miller A
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1984; 156():313-28. PubMed ID: 6473441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. "Informing" and "consenting": ethical concerns regarding illiterate and vulnerable participants in clinical trials.
    Dewar R; Parkash V; Forrow L
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2014; 11(4):1-2. PubMed ID: 25377029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Screening for cervical cancer in women older than 65 years will probably reduce the incidence and mortality].
    Hammer A; Fuglsang K; Høgsbjerg K; Blaakær J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2015 Jun; 177(23):V12140697. PubMed ID: 26058436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Outcome and future of mass screening for uterine cervical cancer].
    Noda K; Tejima K
    Gan No Rinsho; 1983 May; 29(6):483-7. PubMed ID: 6410103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High-risk groups and cervical cancer.
    Br Med J; 1980 Sep; 281(6241):629-30. PubMed ID: 7437742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Progress in the early detection of cervix cancer from the viewpoint of the Saarland cancer register].
    Brenner H; Wiebelt H; Ziegler H
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1990 Apr; 50(4):304-9. PubMed ID: 2358181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is cervical cancer screening necessary or the "Paradox" example of Bulgaria.
    Kostova P; Zlatkov V
    J BUON; 2010; 15(3):556-60. PubMed ID: 20941827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cervical screening: what is the point?
    Sasieni P
    Lancet; 1995 Jul; 346(8969):244; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 7616810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness of a cancer control programme.
    Knox EG; Woodman CB
    Cancer Surv; 1988; 7(3):379-401. PubMed ID: 3242791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness of cervical-cancer screening in developing countries.
    Suba EJ; Frable WJ; Raab SS
    N Engl J Med; 2006 Apr; 354(14):1535-6; author reply 1535-6. PubMed ID: 16598056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Cancer of the cervix uteri: analysis of the cost-benefit and efficacy of opportunistic screening versus organized screening].
    Castronovo V; Foidart JM; Boniver J
    Rev Med Liege; 1998 May; 53(5):305-7. PubMed ID: 9689888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cervical cancer.
    Beral V; Hermon C; Muñoz N; Devesa SS
    Cancer Surv; 1994; 19-20():265-85. PubMed ID: 7534630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.