These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25103469)

  • 1. The effect of scientific evidence on conservation practitioners' management decisions.
    Walsh JC; Dicks LV; Sutherland WJ
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Feb; 29(1):88-98. PubMed ID: 25103469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bridging research and practice in conservation.
    Kadykalo AN; Buxton RT; Morrison P; Anderson CM; Bickerton H; Francis CM; Smith AC; Fahrig L
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Dec; 35(6):1725-1737. PubMed ID: 33738830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contribution of systematic reviews to management decisions.
    Cook CN; Possingham HP; Fuller RA
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Oct; 27(5):902-15. PubMed ID: 24001025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How expert insight into alpine peatland conservation complements global scientific evidence.
    Rowland JA; Moore JL; Walsh JC
    Conserv Biol; 2023 Jun; 37(3):e14081. PubMed ID: 36919467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shared ways of thinking in Brazil about the science-practice interface in ecology and conservation.
    Bertuol-Garcia D; Morsello C; N El-Hani C; Pardini R
    Conserv Biol; 2020 Apr; 34(2):449-461. PubMed ID: 30350891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conservation practitioners' understanding of how to manage evolutionary processes.
    Cook CN; Sgrò CM
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Oct; 33(5):993-1001. PubMed ID: 30866093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The value of using feasibility models in systematic conservation planning to predict landholder management uptake.
    Tulloch AI; Tulloch VJ; Evans MC; Mills M
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1462-73. PubMed ID: 25382827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of risk aversion on prioritizing conservation projects.
    Tulloch AI; Maloney RF; Joseph LN; Bennett JR; Di Fonzo MM; Probert WJ; O'Connor SM; Densem JP; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Apr; 29(2):513-24. PubMed ID: 25327837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A mixed methodology for evaluating use of evidence in conservation planning.
    Stevens M; Norris DR
    Conserv Biol; 2022 Aug; 36(4):e13876. PubMed ID: 34907584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of monitoring data to support conservation management and policy decisions in Micronesia.
    Montambault JR; Wongbusarakum S; Leberer T; Joseph E; Andrew W; Castro F; Nevitt B; Golbuu Y; Oldiais NW; Groves CR; Kostka W; Houk P
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Oct; 29(5):1279-89. PubMed ID: 26036983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recognizing reflexivity among conservation practitioners.
    Pienkowski T; Kiik L; Catalano A; Hazenbosch M; Izquierdo-Tort S; Khanyari M; Kutty R; Martins C; Nash F; Saif O; Sandbrook C
    Conserv Biol; 2023 Apr; 37(2):e14022. PubMed ID: 36285608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Incorporating geodiversity into conservation decisions.
    Comer PJ; Pressey RL; Hunter ML; Schloss CA; Buttrick SC; Heller NE; Tirpak JM; Faith DP; Cross MS; Shaffer ML
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Jun; 29(3):692-701. PubMed ID: 25923052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A typology of barriers and enablers of scientific evidence use in conservation practice.
    Walsh JC; Dicks LV; Raymond CM; Sutherland WJ
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Nov; 250():109481. PubMed ID: 31518795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lessons from other disciplines for setting management thresholds for biodiversity conservation.
    Hilton M; Walsh JC; Liddell E; Cook CN
    Conserv Biol; 2022 Feb; 36(1):e13865. PubMed ID: 34811813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Closing the knowledge-action gap in conservation with open science.
    Roche DG; O'Dea RE; Kerr KA; Rytwinski T; Schuster R; Nguyen VM; Young N; Bennett JR; Cooke SJ
    Conserv Biol; 2022 Jun; 36(3):e13835. PubMed ID: 34476839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accounting for complementarity to maximize monitoring power for species management.
    Tulloch AI; Chadès I; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Oct; 27(5):988-99. PubMed ID: 24073812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incorporating climate science in applications of the US endangered species act for aquatic species.
    McClure MM; Alexander M; Borggaard D; Boughton D; Crozier L; Griffis R; Jorgensen JC; Lindley ST; Nye J; Rowland MJ; Seney EE; Snover A; Toole C; VAN Houtan K
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1222-33. PubMed ID: 24299088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using social-network research to improve outcomes in natural resource management.
    Groce JE; Farrelly MA; Jorgensen BS; Cook CN
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Feb; 33(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 29738621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Informed actions: where to cost effectively manage multiple threats to species to maximize return on investment.
    Auerbach NA; Tulloch AIT; Possingham HP
    Ecol Appl; 2014; 24(6):1357-73. PubMed ID: 29160659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The challenge of biased evidence in conservation.
    Christie AP; Amano T; Martin PA; Petrovan SO; Shackelford GE; Simmons BI; Smith RK; Williams DR; Wordley CFR; Sutherland WJ
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Feb; 35(1):249-262. PubMed ID: 32583521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.