These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25103688)

  • 1. Lucky guess or knowledge: a cross-sectional study using the Bland and Altman analysis to compare confidence-based testing of pharmacological knowledge in 3rd and 5th year medical students.
    Kampmeyer D; Matthes J; Herzig S
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2015 May; 20(2):431-40. PubMed ID: 25103688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sure, or unsure? Measuring students' confidence and the potential impact on patient safety in multiple-choice questions.
    Rangel RH; Möller L; Sitter H; Stibane T; Strzelczyk A
    Med Teach; 2017 Nov; 39(11):1189-1194. PubMed ID: 28799435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing single-best-answer and very-short-answer questions for the assessment of applied medical knowledge in 20 UK medical schools: Cross-sectional study.
    Sam AH; Westacott R; Gurnell M; Wilson R; Meeran K; Brown C
    BMJ Open; 2019 Sep; 9(9):e032550. PubMed ID: 31558462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Answer changing in multiple choice assessment change that answer when in doubt--and spread the word!
    Bauer D; Kopp V; Fischer MR
    BMC Med Educ; 2007 Aug; 7():28. PubMed ID: 17718902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pick-N multiple choice-exams: a comparison of scoring algorithms.
    Bauer D; Holzer M; Kopp V; Fischer MR
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2011 May; 16(2):211-21. PubMed ID: 21038082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does student confidence on multiple-choice question assessments provide useful information?
    Curtis DA; Lind SL; Boscardin CK; Dellinges M
    Med Educ; 2013 Jun; 47(6):578-84. PubMed ID: 23662875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The comparison of 4th, 5th and 6th year medical students knowledge of rules and practical skills in the interpretation of electrocardiograms at Jagiellonian University].
    Pudło J; Wierdak M; Macioł K; Gumul K; Lelakowski J
    Przegl Lek; 2012; 69(4):143-8. PubMed ID: 23029708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Knowledge self-monitoring, efficiency, and determinants of self-confidence statement in multiple choice questions in medical students.
    Tabibzadeh N; Mullaert J; Zafrani L; Balagny P; Frija-Masson J; Marin S; Lefort A; Vidal-Petiot E; Flamant M
    BMC Med Educ; 2020 Nov; 20(1):445. PubMed ID: 33213443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validity of very short answer versus single best answer questions for undergraduate assessment.
    Sam AH; Hameed S; Harris J; Meeran K
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Oct; 16(1):266. PubMed ID: 27737661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Post-exam feedback with question rationales improves re-test performance of medical students on a multiple-choice exam.
    Levant B; Zückert W; Paolo A
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2018 Dec; 23(5):995-1003. PubMed ID: 30043313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The IDEA Assessment Tool: Assessing the Reporting, Diagnostic Reasoning, and Decision-Making Skills Demonstrated in Medical Students' Hospital Admission Notes.
    Baker EA; Ledford CH; Fogg L; Way DP; Park YS
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):163-73. PubMed ID: 25893938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.
    Harris BH; Walsh JL; Tayyaba S; Harris DA; Wilson DJ; Smith PE
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 25893940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Perception of medical students about formative assessments during clinical courses].
    Labarca J; Figueroa C; Huidobro B; Wright AC; Riquelme A; Moreno R
    Rev Med Chil; 2014 Sep; 142(9):1193-9. PubMed ID: 25517060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measuring the effectiveness of pharmacology teaching in undergraduate medical students.
    Urrutia-Aguilar ME; Martinez-Gonzalez A; Rodriguez R
    J Patient Saf; 2012 Mar; 8(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 22139044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Informing the uninformed: a multitier approach to uncover students' misconceptions on cardiovascular physiology.
    Versteeg M; Wijnen-Meijer M; Steendijk P
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2019 Mar; 43(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 30540202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experience with the objective structured examination as a tool for students' assessment in the Department of Community Medicine and Primary Health Care in a university [corrected] in Western Saudi Arabia.
    Shawky S
    Saudi Med J; 2002 Feb; 23(2):151-5. PubMed ID: 11938388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How did you guess? Or, what do multiple-choice questions measure?
    Cox KR
    Med J Aust; 1976 Jun; 1(23):884-6. PubMed ID: 967086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correcting for guessing increases validity in multiple-choice examinations in an oral and maxillofacial pathology course.
    Prihoda TJ; Pinckard RN; McMahan CA; Jones AC
    J Dent Educ; 2006 Apr; 70(4):378-86. PubMed ID: 16595530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Benefit of a Switch: Answer-Changing on Multiple-Choice Exams by First-Year Dental Students.
    Pagni SE; Bak AG; Eisen SE; Murphy JL; Finkelman MD; Kugel G
    J Dent Educ; 2017 Jan; 81(1):110-115. PubMed ID: 28049684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Immediate detailed feedback to test-enhanced learning: an effective online educational tool.
    Wojcikowski K; Kirk L
    Med Teach; 2013 Nov; 35(11):915-9. PubMed ID: 24003913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.