188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25103986)
1. The outcome of a quality-controlled mammography screening program: experience from a population-based study in Taiwan.
Pan HB; Wong KF; Yang TL; Hsu GC; Chou CP; Huang JS; Lee SK; Chou YH; Chiang CL; Liang HL
J Chin Med Assoc; 2014 Oct; 77(10):531-4. PubMed ID: 25103986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening Digital Mammography Recall Rate: Does It Change with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Experience?
DiPrete O; Lourenco AP; Baird GL; Mainiero MB
Radiology; 2018 Mar; 286(3):838-844. PubMed ID: 29173123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Criteria for identifying radiologists with acceptable screening mammography interpretive performance on basis of multiple performance measures.
Miglioretti DL; Ichikawa L; Smith RA; Bassett LW; Feig SA; Monsees B; Parikh JR; Rosenberg RD; Sickles EA; Carney PA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Apr; 204(4):W486-91. PubMed ID: 25794100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of digital screening mammography among older women in the United States.
Henderson LM; O'Meara ES; Braithwaite D; Onega T;
Cancer; 2015 May; 121(9):1379-86. PubMed ID: 25537958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adjusting mammography--audit recommendations in a lower-incidence Taiwanese population.
Chen CY; Tzeng WS; Tsai CC; Mak CW; Chen CH; Chou MC
J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Sep; 5(9):978-85. PubMed ID: 18755438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis - 4 year experience and comparison with national data.
Pan HB; Wong KF; Yao A; Hsu GC; Chou CP; Liang HL; Huang JS; Li HJ; Wang SC; Yang TL
J Chin Med Assoc; 2018 Jan; 81(1):70-80. PubMed ID: 29129518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can missed breast cancer be recognized by regular peer auditing on screening mammography?
Pan HB; Yang TL; Hsu GC; Chiang CL; Huang JS; Chou CP; Wang YC; Liang HL; Lee SK; Chou YH; Wong KF
J Chin Med Assoc; 2012 Sep; 75(9):464-7. PubMed ID: 22989543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening.
McDonald ES; Oustimov A; Weinstein SP; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jun; 2(6):737-43. PubMed ID: 26893205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Screening mammographic performance by race and age in the National Mammography Database: 29,479,665 screening mammograms from 13,181,241 women.
Lee CS; Goldman L; Grimm LJ; Liu IX; Simanowith M; Rosenberg R; Zuley M; Moy L
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2024 Feb; 203(3):599-612. PubMed ID: 37897646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of mammographic technologists on radiologists' ability to interpret screening mammograms in community practice.
Henderson LM; Benefield T; Marsh MW; Schroeder BF; Durham DD; Yankaskas BC; Bowling JM
Acad Radiol; 2015 Mar; 22(3):278-89. PubMed ID: 25435185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiologist Characteristics Associated with Interpretive Performance of Screening Mammography: A National Mammography Database (NMD) Study.
Lee CS; Moy L; Hughes D; Golden D; Bhargavan-Chatfield M; Hemingway J; Geras A; Duszak R; Rosenkrantz AB
Radiology; 2021 Sep; 300(3):518-528. PubMed ID: 34156300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A simulation model investigating the impact of tumor volume doubling time and mammographic tumor detectability on screening outcomes in women aged 40-49 years.
Bailey SL; Sigal BM; Plevritis SK
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Aug; 102(16):1263-71. PubMed ID: 20664027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nationwide mammographic screening and breast cancer mortality in Taiwan: an interrupted time-series analysis.
Su SY
Breast Cancer; 2022 Mar; 29(2):336-342. PubMed ID: 34837139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Simulation Screening Mammography Module Created for Instruction and Assessment: Radiology Residents vs National Benchmarks.
Poot JD; Chetlen AL
Acad Radiol; 2016 Nov; 23(11):1454-1462. PubMed ID: 27637285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Peer reviewing of screening mammography in Taiwan: its reliability and the improvement.
Pan HB; Hsu GC; Yang TL; Huang JS; Chou CP; Liang HL; Lee SK; Chou YH; Li HJ; Wong KF
Chin Med J (Engl); 2013 Jan; 126(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 23286480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. National Performance Benchmarks for Modern Screening Digital Mammography: Update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.
Lehman CD; Arao RF; Sprague BL; Lee JM; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Henderson LM; Onega T; Tosteson AN; Rauscher GH; Miglioretti DL
Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 27918707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical implementation of synthesized mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis in a routine clinical practice.
Freer PE; Riegert J; Eisenmenger L; Ose D; Winkler N; Stein MA; Stoddard GJ; Hess R
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Nov; 166(2):501-509. PubMed ID: 28780702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
