176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25104291)
1. Detection of carotid artery stenosis: a comparison between 2 unenhanced MRAs and dual-source CTA.
Lv P; Lin J; Guo D; Liu H; Tang X; Fu C; Hu J
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2014 Dec; 35(12):2360-5. PubMed ID: 25104291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic accuracy of colour Doppler ultrasonography, CT angiography and blood-pool-enhanced MR angiography in assessing carotid stenosis: a comparative study with DSA in 170 patients.
Anzidei M; Napoli A; Zaccagna F; Di Paolo P; Saba L; Cavallo Marincola B; Zini C; Cartocci G; Di Mare L; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2012 Feb; 117(1):54-71. PubMed ID: 21424318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Grading of carotid artery stenosis in the presence of extensive calcifications: dual-energy CT angiography in comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
Korn A; Bender B; Brodoefel H; Hauser TK; Danz S; Ernemann U; Thomas C
Clin Neuroradiol; 2015 Mar; 25(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 24343701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Dual-energy CT angiography for evaluation of internal carotid artery stenosis and occlusion].
Chen Y; Xue HD; Jin ZY; Liu W; Sun H; Wang X; Zhao WM; Wang Y; Mu WB
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2009 Apr; 31(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 19507603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of PETRA-MRA to assess intracranial arterial stenosis: Comparison with TOF-MRA, CTA, and DSA.
Niu J; Ran Y; Chen R; Zhang F; Lei X; Wang X; Li T; Zhu J; Zhang Y; Cheng J; Zhang Y; Zhu C
Front Neurol; 2022; 13():1068132. PubMed ID: 36726752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preliminary experience with MRA in evaluating the degree of carotid stenosis and plaque morphology using high-resolution sequences after gadofosveset trisodium (Vasovist) administration: comparison with CTA and DSA.
Anzidei M; Napoli A; Geiger D; Cavallo Marincola B; Zini C; Zaccagna F; Di Paolo P; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2010 Jun; 115(4):634-47. PubMed ID: 20177976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dual-energy CTA with bone removal for transcranial arteries: intraindividual comparison with standard CTA without bone removal and TOF-MRA.
Buerke B; Wittkamp G; Seifarth H; Heindel W; Kloska SP
Acad Radiol; 2009 Nov; 16(11):1348-55. PubMed ID: 19608437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of Symptomatic Carotid Plaque Using Source Data from MR and CT Angiography: A Correlative Study.
Gupta A; Baradaran H; Mtui EE; Kamel H; Pandya A; Giambrone A; Iadecola C; Sanelli PC
Cerebrovasc Dis; 2015; 39(3-4):151-61. PubMed ID: 25721945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bone subtraction CTA for transcranial arteries: intra-individual comparison with standard CTA without bone subtraction and TOF-MRA.
Buerke B; Puesken M; Wittkamp G; Stehling C; Ditt H; Seidensticker P; Wessling J; Heindel W; Kloska SP
Clin Radiol; 2010 Jun; 65(6):440-6. PubMed ID: 20451010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of digital subtraction angiography, computed tomography angiography, and magnetic resonance angiography in grading of carotid artery stenosis in comparison with actual measurement in an in vitro model.
Smith JC; Watkins GE; Smith DC; Palmer EW; Abou-Zamzam AM; Zhao CX; Zhang WW
Ann Vasc Surg; 2012 Apr; 26(3):338-43. PubMed ID: 22285345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CT angiographic analysis of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of manual assessment, semiautomatic vessel analysis, and digital subtraction angiography.
Silvennoinen HM; Ikonen S; Soinne L; Railo M; Valanne L
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2007 Jan; 28(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 17213433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical usefulness of and problems with three-dimensional CT angiography for the evaluation of arteriosclerotic stenosis of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional angiography, MRA, and ultrasound sonography.
Sameshima T; Futami S; Morita Y; Yokogami K; Miyahara S; Sameshima Y; Goya T; Wakisaka S
Surg Neurol; 1999 Mar; 51(3):301-8; discussion 308-9. PubMed ID: 10086495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional computed tomography angiography and magnetic resonance angiography of carotid bifurcation stenosis.
Binaghi S; Maeder P; Uské A; Meuwly JY; Devuyst G; Meuli RA
Eur Neurol; 2001; 46(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 11455180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 3D Black-Blood Luminal Angiography Derived from High-Resolution MR Vessel Wall Imaging in Detecting MCA Stenosis: A Preliminary Study.
Bai X; Lv P; Liu K; Li Q; Ding J; Qu J; Lin J
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2018 Oct; 39(10):1827-1832. PubMed ID: 30139751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography is not more accurate than unenhanced 2D time-of-flight MR angiography for determining > or = 70% internal carotid artery stenosis.
Babiarz LS; Romero JM; Murphy EK; Brobeck B; Schaefer PW; González RG; Lev MH
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2009 Apr; 30(4):761-8. PubMed ID: 19164440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcome, observer reliability, and patient preferences if CTA, MRA, or Doppler ultrasound were used, individually or together, instead of digital subtraction angiography before carotid endarterectomy.
Patel SG; Collie DA; Wardlaw JM; Lewis SC; Wright AR; Gibson RJ; Sellar RJ
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2002 Jul; 73(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 12082040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of Noncontrast Quiescent-Interval Single-Shot Lower Extremity MR Angiography Versus CT Angiography for Diagnosis of Peripheral Artery Disease: Comparison With Digital Subtraction Angiography.
Varga-Szemes A; Wichmann JL; Schoepf UJ; Suranyi P; De Cecco CN; Muscogiuri G; Caruso D; Yamada RT; Litwin SE; Tesche C; Duguay TM; Giri S; Vliegenthart R; Todoran TM
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Oct; 10(10 Pt A):1116-1124. PubMed ID: 28109932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Non-invasive assessment of epiaortic vessels. Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography with gadolinium, spiral computerized tomography angiography, and digital angiography].
Bozzao A; Floris R; Pocek M; Fasoli F; Garaci FG; Simonetti G
Radiol Med; 2001; 101(1-2):48-53. PubMed ID: 11360753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of carotid artery stenosis with multisection CT and MR imaging: influence of imaging modality and postprocessing.
Lell M; Fellner C; Baum U; Hothorn T; Steiner R; Lang W; Bautz W; Fellner FA
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2007 Jan; 28(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 17213434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CT angiography for the detection and characterization of carotid artery bifurcation disease.
Anderson GB; Ashforth R; Steinke DE; Ferdinandy R; Findlay JM
Stroke; 2000 Sep; 31(9):2168-74. PubMed ID: 10978047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
