176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25104291)
21. Overestimation of carotid artery stenosis with magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Nederkoorn PJ; Elgersma OE; Mali WP; Eikelboom BC; Kappelle LJ; van der Graaf Y
J Vasc Surg; 2002 Oct; 36(4):806-13. PubMed ID: 12368742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. An international multicenter comparison of time-SLIP unenhanced MR angiography and contrast-enhanced CT angiography for assessing renal artery stenosis: the renal artery contrast-free trial.
Albert TS; Akahane M; Parienty I; Yellin N; Catalá V; Alomar X; Prot A; Tomizawa N; Xue H; Katabathina VS; Lopera JE; Jin Z
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):182-8. PubMed ID: 25539255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Gadolinium-enhanced versus time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography: what is the benefit of contrast enhancement in evaluating carotid stenosis?
Muhs BE; Gagne P; Wagener J; Baker J; Ortega MR; Adelman MA; Cayne NS; Rockman CB; Maldonado T
Ann Vasc Surg; 2005 Nov; 19(6):823-8. PubMed ID: 16200470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Accuracy and utility of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in planning carotid stenting.
Timaran CH; Rosero EB; Valentine RJ; Modrall JG; Smith S; Clagett GP
J Vasc Surg; 2007 Aug; 46(2):257-63; discussion 263-4. PubMed ID: 17600659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of carotid plaque ulcer detection using contrast-enhanced and time-of-flight MRA techniques.
Etesami M; Hoi Y; Steinman DA; Gujar SK; Nidecker AE; Astor BC; Portanova A; Qiao Y; Abdalla WM; Wasserman BA
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2013 Jan; 34(1):177-84. PubMed ID: 22627797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Assessment of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Plaques Using 3D Black-Blood MRI: Comparison With 3D Time-of-Flight MRA and DSA.
Tian X; Tian B; Shi Z; Wu X; Peng W; Zhang X; Malhotra A; Mossa-Basha M; Sekhar L; Liu Q; Lu J; Hu C; Zhu C
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Feb; 53(2):469-478. PubMed ID: 32864816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Three-dimensional spin-echo-based black-blood MRA in the detection of vasospasm following subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Takano K; Hida K; Iwaasa M; Inoue T; Yoshimitsu K
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Mar; 49(3):800-807. PubMed ID: 30284331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. MR imaging: influence of imaging technique and postprocessing on measurement of internal carotid artery stenosis.
Runck F; Steiner RP; Bautz WA; Lell MM
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2008 Oct; 29(9):1736-42. PubMed ID: 18635618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Detection of carotid artery stenosis using histological specimens: a comparison of CT angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography and Doppler ultrasonography.
Netuka D; Belšán T; Broulíková K; Mandys V; Charvát F; Malík J; Coufalová L; Bradáč O; Ostrý S; Beneš V
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2016 Aug; 158(8):1505-14. PubMed ID: 27255656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of dual-source CT angiography and MR angiography in preoperative evaluation of intra- and extracranial vessels: a pilot study.
Mühlenbruch G; Das M; Mommertz G; Schaaf M; Langer S; Mahnken AH; Wildberger JE; Thron A; Günther RW; Krings T
Eur Radiol; 2010 Feb; 20(2):469-76. PubMed ID: 19697041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Actual role of unenhanced magnetic resonance angiography (mra tof 3d) in the study of stenosis and occlusion of extracranial carotid artery.
Scarabino T; Fossaceca R; Carra L; Florio F; Marano G; Carriero A
Radiol Med; 2003; 106(5-6):497-503. PubMed ID: 14735016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Modified Dual-Energy Algorithm for Calcified Plaque Removal: Evaluation in Carotid Computed Tomography Angiography and Comparison With Digital Subtraction Angiography.
Mannil M; Ramachandran J; Vittoria de Martini I; Wegener S; Schmidt B; Flohr T; Krauss B; Valavanis A; Alkadhi H; Winklhofer S
Invest Radiol; 2017 Nov; 52(11):680-685. PubMed ID: 28542096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Dual-energy CT head bone and hard plaque removal for quantification of calcified carotid stenosis: utility and comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
Uotani K; Watanabe Y; Higashi M; Nakazawa T; Kono AK; Hori Y; Fukuda T; Kanzaki S; Yamada N; Itoh T; Sugimura K; Naito H
Eur Radiol; 2009 Aug; 19(8):2060-5. PubMed ID: 19277672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Initial experience with helical CT and 3D reconstruction in therapeutic planning of cerebral AVMs: comparison with 3D time-of-flight MRA and digital subtraction angiography.
Tanaka H; Numaguchi Y; Konno S; Shrier DA; Shibata DK; Patel U
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1997; 21(5):811-7. PubMed ID: 9294581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Feasibility of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Angiography/Black-Blood Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Computed Tomography Fusion Imaging Without Contrast Agent for Carotid Endarterectomy.
Kuroda H; Nakai Y; Miyake S; Mochizuki T; Shimizu S; Fujiwara S; Ogasawara K; Kumabe T
World Neurosurg; 2022 Nov; 167():e1219-e1224. PubMed ID: 36089271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE MRA) in the study of the carotid stenosis: comparison with digital subtraction angiography (DSA).
Scarabino T; Carriero A; Giannatempo GM; Marano R; De Matthaeis P; Bonomo L; Salvolini U
J Neuroradiol; 1999 Jun; 26(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 10444932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Highly accelerated time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography using spiral imaging improves conspicuity of intracranial arterial branches while reducing scan time.
Greve T; Sollmann N; Hock A; Hey S; Gnanaprakasam V; Nijenhuis M; Zimmer C; Kirschke JS
Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):855-865. PubMed ID: 31664504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. High-resolution steady state magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries: are intravascular agents necessary?: feasibility and preliminary experience with gadobenate dimeglumine.
Anzidei M; Napoli A; Marincola BC; Kirchin MA; Neira C; Geiger D; Zaccagna F; Catalano C; Passariello R
Invest Radiol; 2009 Dec; 44(12):784-92. PubMed ID: 19858728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Sundgren PC; Sundén P; Lindgren A; Lanke J; Holtås S; Larsson EM
Neuroradiology; 2002 Jul; 44(7):592-9. PubMed ID: 12136361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR DSA of the carotid artery bifurcation: preliminary study of comparison with unenhanced 2D and 3D time-of-flight MR angiography.
Willig DS; Turski PA; Frayne R; Graves VB; Korosec FR; Swan JS; Mistretta CA; Grist TM
Radiology; 1998 Aug; 208(2):447-51. PubMed ID: 9680574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
