176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25104291)
41. How should we estimate carotid stenosis using magnetic resonance angiography?
Vanninen RL; Manninen HI; Partanen PK; Tulla H; Vainio PA
Neuroradiology; 1996 May; 38(4):299-305. PubMed ID: 8738083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. [An evaluation of the carotid bifurcation and of the intracranial circle by angio-spiral computed tomography].
Bozzao A; Floris R; Villani A; Varrucciu V; Baviera ME; Simonetti G
Radiol Med; 1998 Jun; 95(6):577-82. PubMed ID: 9717538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Time-of-flight MR angiography of carotid artery stenosis: does a flow void represent severe stenosis?
Nederkoorn PJ; van der Graaf Y; Eikelboom BC; van der Lugt A; Bartels LW; Mali WP
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2002; 23(10):1779-84. PubMed ID: 12427639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Assessment of cross-sectional area and diameter of carotid artery using time-of-flight MR angiography and CT angiography].
Yasuda E; Miyati T
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 21532247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography and Doppler ultrasonography in detection of carotid artery stenosis: a comparison with findings from histological specimens.
Netuka D; Ostrý S; Belsán T; Rucka D; Mandys V; Charvát F; Bradác O; Benes V
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2010 Jul; 152(7):1215-21. PubMed ID: 20411283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography.
Randoux B; Marro B; Koskas F; Duyme M; Sahel M; Zouaoui A; Marsault C
Radiology; 2001 Jul; 220(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 11425993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Carotid stenosis: a comparison between MR and spiral CT angiography.
Magarelli N; Scarabino T; Simeone AL; Florio F; Carriero A; Salvolini U; Bonomo L
Neuroradiology; 1998 Jun; 40(6):367-73. PubMed ID: 9689624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Evaluation of chronic carotid artery occlusion by non-contrast 3D-MERGE MR vessel wall imaging: comparison with 3D-TOF-MRA, contrast-enhanced MRA, and DSA.
Zhang J; Ding S; Zhao H; Sun B; Li X; Zhou Y; Wan J; Degnan AJ; Xu J; Zhu C
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):5805-5814. PubMed ID: 32529567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Evaluating non-invasive medical imaging for diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis with ischemic cerebrovascular disease.
Lu X; Zhang W; Gui Q; Yu M; Guo Y
Chin Med J (Engl); 2003 Jan; 116(1):112-5. PubMed ID: 12667401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Doppler ultrasound and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in assessing carotid artery stenosis.
D'Onofrio M; Mansueto G; Faccioli N; Guarise A; Tamellini P; Bogina G; Pozzi Mucelli R
Radiol Med; 2006 Feb; 111(1):93-103. PubMed ID: 16623309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Specificity of MR angiography as a confirmatory test for carotid artery stenosis: is it valid?
Layton KF; Huston J; Cloft HJ; Kaufmann TJ; Krecke KN; Kallmes DF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Apr; 188(4):1114-6. PubMed ID: 17377056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Dual-energy CT angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: image quality, radiation dose, and comparison with 3D rotational digital subtraction angiography.
Zhang LJ; Wu SY; Niu JB; Zhang ZL; Wang HZ; Zhao YE; Chai X; Zhou CS; Lu GM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jan; 194(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 20028901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [Quantification of extracranial ICA stenoses with vessel ultrasound by CCDS and B-flow in comparison to 64-slice multidector CTA, contrast-enhanced MRA and DSA].
Finkenzeller T; Tacke J; Clevert DA; Jung W; Kubale R; Schreyer A; Feuerbach S; Jung EM
Ultraschall Med; 2008 Jun; 29(3):294-301. PubMed ID: 18484060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Alvarez-Linera J; Benito-León J; Escribano J; Campollo J; Gesto R
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003 May; 24(5):1012-9. PubMed ID: 12748115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. CT angiography and MR angiography in the evaluation of carotid cavernous sinus fistula prior to embolization: a comparison of techniques.
Chen CC; Chang PC; Shy CG; Chen WS; Hung HC
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2005 Oct; 26(9):2349-56. PubMed ID: 16219844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. MR angiography at 3 Tesla to assess proximal internal carotid artery stenoses: contrast-enhanced or 3D time-of-flight MR angiography?
Weber J; Veith P; Jung B; Ihorst G; Moske-Eick O; Meckel S; Urbach H; Taschner CA
Clin Neuroradiol; 2015 Mar; 25(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 24384680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Duplex ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography in carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review.
Nederkoorn PJ; van der Graaf Y; Hunink MG
Stroke; 2003 May; 34(5):1324-32. PubMed ID: 12690221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomographic angiography and gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for the assessment of hemodynamically significant transplant renal artery stenosis.
Gaddikeri S; Mitsumori L; Vaidya S; Hippe DS; Bhargava P; Dighe MK
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2014; 43(4):162-8. PubMed ID: 24948209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Improved carotid lumen delineation on non-contrast MR angiography using SNAP (Simultaneous Non-Contrast Angiography and Intraplaque Hemorrhage) imaging.
Liu H; Sun J; Hippe DS; Wu W; Chu B; Balu N; Hatsukami T; Yuan C
Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Oct; 62():87-93. PubMed ID: 31247251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography for measuring carotid artery stenosis.
Modaresi KB; Cox TC; Summers PE; Jarosz JM; Verma H; Taylor PR; Padayachee TS
Br J Surg; 1999 Nov; 86(11):1422-6. PubMed ID: 10583289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
