These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25105951)

  • 1. Dynamic adjustments of cognitive control during economic decision making.
    Soutschek A; Schubert T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Oct; 152():42-6. PubMed ID: 25105951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Altered economic decision-making in abstinent heroin addicts: Evidence from the ultimatum game.
    Hou Y; Zhao L; Yao Q; Ding L
    Neurosci Lett; 2016 Aug; 627():148-54. PubMed ID: 27264486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceived relative social status and cognitive load influence acceptance of unfair offers in the Ultimatum Game.
    Harris A; Young A; Hughson L; Green D; Doan SN; Hughson E; Reed CL
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227717. PubMed ID: 31917806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Affective state and decision-making in the Ultimatum Game.
    van 't Wout M; Kahn RS; Sanfey AG; Aleman A
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 169(4):564-8. PubMed ID: 16489438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Economic decision-making in the ultimatum game by smokers.
    Takahashi T
    Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2007 Oct; 28(5):659-61. PubMed ID: 17984946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Salivary alpha-amylase levels and rejection of unfair offers in the ultimatum game.
    Takagishi H; Fujii T; Kameshima S; Koizumi M; Takahashi T
    Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2009; 30(5):643-6. PubMed ID: 20035253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Social Decision Making in Adolescents and Young Adults: Evidence From the Ultimatum Game and Cognitive Biases.
    Marchetti A; Baglio F; Castelli I; Griffanti L; Nemni R; Rossetto F; Valle A; Zanette M; Massaro D
    Psychol Rep; 2019 Feb; 122(1):135-154. PubMed ID: 29402178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cardiac responses predict decisions: an investigation of the relation between orienting response and decisions in the ultimatum game.
    Osumi T; Ohira H
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Oct; 74(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 19646490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The neural basis of economic decision-making in the Ultimatum Game.
    Sanfey AG; Rilling JK; Aronson JA; Nystrom LE; Cohen JD
    Science; 2003 Jun; 300(5626):1755-8. PubMed ID: 12805551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diminishing reciprocal fairness by disrupting the right prefrontal cortex.
    Knoch D; Pascual-Leone A; Meyer K; Treyer V; Fehr E
    Science; 2006 Nov; 314(5800):829-32. PubMed ID: 17023614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unfairness sensitivity and social decision-making in individuals with alcohol dependence: a preliminary study.
    Brevers D; Noël X; Ermer E; Dabiri D; Verbanck P; Kornreich C
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2013 Dec; 133(2):772-5. PubMed ID: 24021763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Social comparisons differentially affect fair and unfair processing in ultimatum bargaining.
    Li Q; Dai W; Zheng Y; Wang C; Yang Z; Ren Q; Hu K; Liu X
    Neuropsychologia; 2022 Sep; 174():108318. PubMed ID: 35830915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Being the chosen one: social inclusion modulates decisions in the ultimatum game. An ERP study.
    Falco A; Albinet C; Rattat AC; Paul I; Fabre E
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2019 Feb; 14(2):141-149. PubMed ID: 30608613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Social value orientation modulates fairness processing during social decision-making: evidence from behavior and brain potentials.
    Hu X; Mai X
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2021 Jul; 16(7):670-682. PubMed ID: 33769539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Altered neural responses to social fairness in bipolar disorder.
    Lois G; Schneider EE; Kaurin A; Wessa M
    Neuroimage Clin; 2020; 28():102487. PubMed ID: 33395978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neural signatures of fairness-related normative decision making in the ultimatum game: a coordinate-based meta-analysis.
    Feng C; Luo YJ; Krueger F
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2015 Feb; 36(2):591-602. PubMed ID: 25327760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preference and strategy in proposer's prosocial giving in the ultimatum game.
    Inaba M; Inoue Y; Akutsu S; Takahashi N; Yamagishi T
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193877. PubMed ID: 29505587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exploring the relationship between fairness and 'brain types' in children with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder.
    Wang Y; Xiao Y; Li Y; Chu K; Feng M; Li C; Qiu N; Weng J; Ke X
    Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry; 2019 Jan; 88():151-158. PubMed ID: 30009870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Proposer's moral identity modulates fairness processing in the ultimatum game: Evidence from behavior and brain potentials.
    Fan C; Wang H; Liu D; Sun J; Han F; He W
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2024 Jul; 201():112360. PubMed ID: 38735630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Response time in economic games reflects different types of decision conflict for prosocial and proself individuals.
    Yamagishi T; Matsumoto Y; Kiyonari T; Takagishi H; Li Y; Kanai R; Sakagami M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Jun; 114(24):6394-6399. PubMed ID: 28559334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.