These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25105951)

  • 21. Irrational economic decision-making after ventromedial prefrontal damage: evidence from the Ultimatum Game.
    Koenigs M; Tranel D
    J Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 27(4):951-6. PubMed ID: 17251437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Beauty matters: social preferences in a three-person ultimatum game.
    Ma Q; Hu Y
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0125806. PubMed ID: 25951138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. How much is our fairness worth? The effect of raising stakes on offers by Proposers and minimum acceptable offers in Dictator and Ultimatum Games.
    Novakova J; Flegr J
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e60966. PubMed ID: 23580080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mentalizing in economic decision-making.
    Polezzi D; Daum I; Rubaltelli E; Lotto L; Civai C; Sartori G; Rumiati R
    Behav Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 190(2):218-23. PubMed ID: 18406476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Age-related changes in social decision-making: An electrophysiological analysis of unfairness evaluation in the Ultimatum Game.
    Fernandes C; Gonçalves AR; Pasion R; Ferreira-Santos F; Barbosa F; Martins IP; Marques-Teixeira J
    Neurosci Lett; 2019 Jan; 692():122-126. PubMed ID: 30391319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Neural correlates of fair behavior in interpersonal bargaining.
    Weiland S; Hewig J; Hecht H; Mussel P; Miltner WH
    Soc Neurosci; 2012; 7(5):537-51. PubMed ID: 22443447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dissociation between medial frontal negativity and cardiac responses in the ultimatum game: Effects of offer size and fairness.
    Van der Veen FM; Sahibdin PP
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2011 Dec; 11(4):516-25. PubMed ID: 21786030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. It is only fair: blood donors are more sensitive to violations of fairness norms than nondonors - converging psychometric and ultimatum game evidence.
    Ferguson E; Lawrence C
    Vox Sang; 2018 Apr; 113(3):242-250. PubMed ID: 29424063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Five-year-olds understand fair as equal in a mini-ultimatum game.
    Wittig M; Jensen K; Tomasello M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Oct; 116(2):324-37. PubMed ID: 23917161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Medial frontal negativity reflects advantageous inequality aversion of proposers in the ultimatum game: An ERP study.
    Wang G; Li J; Li Z; Wei M; Li S
    Brain Res; 2016 May; 1639():38-46. PubMed ID: 26930614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Moral reasoning in schizophrenia: an explorative study into economic decision making.
    Wischniewski J; Brüne M
    Cogn Neuropsychiatry; 2011; 16(4):348-63. PubMed ID: 21271414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Emotions and cooperation in economic games.
    Haselhuhn MP; Mellers BA
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Apr; 23(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 15795131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Incidental sadness biases social economic decisions in the Ultimatum Game.
    Harlé KM; Sanfey AG
    Emotion; 2007 Nov; 7(4):876-81. PubMed ID: 18039057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The role of cognitive and emotional perspective taking in economic decision making in the ultimatum game.
    Takagishi H; Koizumi M; Fujii T; Schug J; Kameshima S; Yamagishi T
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e108462. PubMed ID: 25255309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Theory of mind and the Ultimatum Game in healthy adult aging.
    Girardi A; Sala SD; MacPherson SE
    Exp Aging Res; 2018; 44(3):246-257. PubMed ID: 29611796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Behavioral and neuronal determinants of negative reciprocity in the ultimatum game.
    Kaltwasser L; Hildebrandt A; Wilhelm O; Sommer W
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 11(10):1608-17. PubMed ID: 27261490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Overcoming selfishness: reciprocity, inhibition, and cardiac-autonomic control in the ultimatum game.
    Sütterlin S; Herbert C; Schmitt M; Kübler A; Vögele C
    Front Psychol; 2011; 2():173. PubMed ID: 21847383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Outcomes versus intentions in fairness-related decision making: School-aged children's decisions are just like those of adults.
    Jaroslawska AJ; McCormack T; Burns P; Caruso EM
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2020 Jan; 189():104704. PubMed ID: 31634734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fairness concerns predict medial frontal negativity amplitude in ultimatum bargaining.
    Boksem MA; De Cremer D
    Soc Neurosci; 2010; 5(1):118-28. PubMed ID: 19851940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Saliency modulates affective evaluations but not behavioral responses in the ultimatum game.
    Liu C; Chai J; Yu R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Feb; 183():99-107. PubMed ID: 29331200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.