These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25106393)

  • 1. Assessing item fit for unidimensional item response theory models using residuals from estimated item response functions.
    Haberman SJ; Sinharay S; Chon KH
    Psychometrika; 2013 Jul; 78(3):417-40. PubMed ID: 25106393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. HBMIRT: A SAS macro for estimating uni- and multidimensional 1- and 2-parameter item response models in small (and large!) samples.
    Wagner W; Zitzmann S; Hecht M
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Apr; 56(4):4130-4161. PubMed ID: 38519726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the Complexity of Item Response Theory Models.
    Bonifay W; Cai L
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(4):465-484. PubMed ID: 28426237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing fit of alternative unidimensional polytomous IRT models using posterior predictive model checking.
    Li T; Xie C; Jiao H
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Jun; 22(2):397-408. PubMed ID: 27243448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Restricted Recalibration of Item Response Theory Models.
    Liu Y; Yang JS; Maydeu-Olivares A
    Psychometrika; 2019 Jun; 84(2):529-553. PubMed ID: 30895437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robust maximum marginal likelihood (RMML) estimation for item response theory models.
    Hong MR; Cheng Y
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Apr; 51(2):573-588. PubMed ID: 30350024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bayesian item fit analysis for unidimensional item response theory models.
    Sinharay S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 Nov; 59(Pt 2):429-49. PubMed ID: 17067420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adjusted Residuals for Evaluating Conditional Independence in IRT Models for Multistage Adaptive Testing.
    van Rijn PW; Ali US; Shin HJ; Joo SH
    Psychometrika; 2024 Mar; 89(1):317-346. PubMed ID: 37930558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Different approaches to modeling response styles in divide-by-total item response theory models (part 2): Applications and novel extensions.
    Henninger M; Meiser T
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Oct; 25(5):577-595. PubMed ID: 33017167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10.
    Lim H; Wells CS
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 Oct; 44(7-8):563-565. PubMed ID: 34565935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigating the Impact of Item Parameter Drift for Item Response Theory Models with Mixture Distributions.
    Park YS; Lee YS; Xing K
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():255. PubMed ID: 26941699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Model Selection of Nested and Non-Nested Item Response Models Using Vuong Tests.
    Schneider L; Chalmers RP; Debelak R; Merkle EC
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(5):664-684. PubMed ID: 31530187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robustness of the performance of the optimized hierarchical two-parameter logistic IRT model for small-sample item calibration.
    König C; Spoden C; Frey A
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Dec; 55(8):3965-3983. PubMed ID: 36333627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How many IRT parameters does it take to model psychopathology items?
    Reise SP; Waller NG
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Jun; 8(2):164-84. PubMed ID: 12924813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Empirically indistinguishable multidimensional IRT and locally dependent unidimensional item response models.
    Ip EH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 May; 63(Pt 2):395-416. PubMed ID: 19840494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lord-Wingersky Algorithm Version 2.0 for Hierarchical Item Factor Models with Applications in Test Scoring, Scale Alignment, and Model Fit Testing.
    Cai L
    Psychometrika; 2015 Jun; 80(2):535-59. PubMed ID: 25233839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Power Analysis for the Wald, LR, Score, and Gradient Tests in a Marginal Maximum Likelihood Framework: Applications in IRT.
    Zimmer F; Draxler C; Debelak R
    Psychometrika; 2023 Dec; 88(4):1249-1298. PubMed ID: 36029390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using Contemporary Psychometric Methods to Construct and Validate Scores on a Short-Form Version of the Psychological Strain Scales.
    Huen JMY; Zhang J; Osman A; Lew B; Yip PSF
    J Affect Disord; 2021 Feb; 281():1-8. PubMed ID: 33278765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ramsay-curve item response theory (RC-IRT) to detect and correct for nonnormal latent variables.
    Woods CM
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Sep; 11(3):253-70. PubMed ID: 16953704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The value of item response theory in clinical assessment: a review.
    Thomas ML
    Assessment; 2011 Sep; 18(3):291-307. PubMed ID: 20644081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.