These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25106399)

  • 1. A note on the hierarchical model for responses and response times in tests of van der Linden (2007).
    Ranger J
    Psychometrika; 2013 Jul; 78(3):538-44. PubMed ID: 25106399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characterizing the Manifest Probability Distributions of Three Latent Trait Models for Accuracy and Response Time.
    Marsman M; Sigurdardóttir H; Bolsinova M; Maris G
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):870-891. PubMed ID: 30919229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A generalized linear factor model approach to the hierarchical framework for responses and response times.
    Molenaar D; Tuerlinckx F; van der Maas HL
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 May; 68(2):197-219. PubMed ID: 25109494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modeling Differences Between Response Times of Correct and Incorrect Responses.
    Bolsinova M; Tijmstra J
    Psychometrika; 2019 Dec; 84(4):1018-1046. PubMed ID: 31463656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving precision of ability estimation: Getting more from response times.
    Bolsinova M; Tijmstra J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 Feb; 71(1):13-38. PubMed ID: 28635139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Penalized partial likelihood inference of proportional hazards latent trait models.
    Kang HA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 May; 70(2):187-208. PubMed ID: 27958648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Joint Modeling of Ability and Differential Speed Using Responses and Response Times.
    Fox JP; Marianti S
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(4):540-53. PubMed ID: 27269482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using Response Times to Model Not-Reached Items due to Time Limits.
    Pohl S; Ulitzsch E; von Davier M
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):892-920. PubMed ID: 31054065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robust estimation of the hierarchical model for responses and response times.
    Ranger J; Wolgast A; Kuhn JT
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Feb; 72(1):83-107. PubMed ID: 30051905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of item response models for accuracy and speed of item responses with applications to adaptive testing.
    van Rijn PW; Ali US
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 May; 70(2):317-345. PubMed ID: 28474769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using response time data to reduce testing time in cognitive tests.
    Bertling M; Weeks JP
    Psychol Assess; 2018 Mar; 30(3):328-338. PubMed ID: 28447813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response moderation models for conditional dependence between response time and response accuracy.
    Bolsinova M; Tijmstra J; Molenaar D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 May; 70(2):257-279. PubMed ID: 27618470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An accumulator model for responses and response times in tests based on the proportional hazards model.
    Ranger J; Kuhn JT
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 Nov; 67(3):388-407. PubMed ID: 23992122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modeling Responses and Response Times in Tests With the Hierarchical Model and the Three-Parameter Lognormal Distribution.
    Ranger J; Kuhn JT; Ortner TM
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Dec; 80(6):1059-1089. PubMed ID: 33116327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimum Distance Estimation of Multidimensional Diffusion-Based Item Response Theory Models.
    Ranger J; Kuhn JT; Szardenings C
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(6):941-957. PubMed ID: 32019358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating cognitive theory: a joint modeling approach using responses and response times.
    Klein Entink RH; Kuhn JT; Hornke LF; Fox JP
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Mar; 14(1):54-75. PubMed ID: 19271848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bayesian hierarchical response time modelling-A tutorial.
    Koenig C; Becker B; Ulitzsch E
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2023 Nov; 76(3):623-645. PubMed ID: 36811176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian Covariance Structure Modeling of Responses and Process Data.
    Klotzke K; Fox JP
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1675. PubMed ID: 31428007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal likelihood inference for a model for item responses and response times.
    Glas CA; van der Linden WJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):603-26. PubMed ID: 20109271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Box-Cox normal model for response times.
    Klein Entink RH; van der Linden WJ; Fox JP
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Nov; 62(Pt 3):621-40. PubMed ID: 19187574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.