524 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25106620)
1. Deciphering the proteomic signature of human endometrial receptivity.
Garrido-Gómez T; Quiñonero A; Antúnez O; Díaz-Gimeno P; Bellver J; Simón C; Domínguez F
Hum Reprod; 2014 Sep; 29(9):1957-67. PubMed ID: 25106620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differential proteomic analysis of endometrial fluid suggests increased inflammation and impaired glucose metabolism in non-implantative IVF cycles and pinpoints PYGB as a putative implantation marker.
Azkargorta M; Escobes I; Iloro I; Osinalde N; Corral B; Ibañez-Perez J; Exposito A; Prieto B; Elortza F; Matorras R
Hum Reprod; 2018 Oct; 33(10):1898-1906. PubMed ID: 30169642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Global transcriptomic changes occur in uterine fluid-derived extracellular vesicles during the endometrial window for embryo implantation.
Giacomini E; Scotti GM; Vanni VS; Lazarevic D; Makieva S; Privitera L; Signorelli S; Cantone L; Bollati V; Murdica V; Tonon G; Papaleo E; Candiani M; Viganò P
Hum Reprod; 2021 Jul; 36(8):2249-2274. PubMed ID: 34190319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Deciphering the role of PGRMC2 in the human endometrium during the menstrual cycle and in vitro decidualization using an in vitro approach.
Medina-Laver Y; Gonzalez-Martin R; de Castro P; Diaz-Hernandez I; Alama P; Quiñonero A; Palomar A; Dominguez F
Hum Reprod; 2024 May; 39(5):1042-1056. PubMed ID: 38452349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of mifepristone on the transcriptomic signature of endometrial receptivity.
von Grothusen C; Lalitkumar PG; Ruiz-Alonso M; Boggavarapu NR; Navarro R; Miravet-Valenciano J; Gemzell-Danielsson K; Simon C
Hum Reprod; 2018 Oct; 33(10):1889-1897. PubMed ID: 30137464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development of a new comprehensive and reliable endometrial receptivity map (ER Map/ER Grade) based on RT-qPCR gene expression analysis.
Enciso M; Carrascosa JP; Sarasa J; Martínez-Ortiz PA; Munné S; Horcajadas JA; Aizpurua J
Hum Reprod; 2018 Feb; 33(2):220-228. PubMed ID: 29315421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Proteomic analysis of the human receptive versus non-receptive endometrium using differential in-gel electrophoresis and MALDI-MS unveils stathmin 1 and annexin A2 as differentially regulated.
Domínguez F; Garrido-Gómez T; López JA; Camafeita E; Quiñonero A; Pellicer A; Simón C
Hum Reprod; 2009 Oct; 24(10):2607-17. PubMed ID: 19556289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Endometrial receptivity revisited: endometrial transcriptome adjusted for tissue cellular heterogeneity.
Suhorutshenko M; Kukushkina V; Velthut-Meikas A; Altmäe S; Peters M; Mägi R; Krjutškov K; Koel M; Codoñer FM; Martinez-Blanch JF; Vilella F; Simón C; Salumets A; Laisk T
Hum Reprod; 2018 Nov; 33(11):2074-2086. PubMed ID: 30295736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of serum and endometrial progesterone in determining endometrial receptivity.
Labarta E; Sebastian-Leon P; Devesa-Peiro A; Celada P; Vidal C; Giles J; Rodriguez-Varela C; Bosch E; Diaz-Gimeno P
Hum Reprod; 2021 Oct; 36(11):2861-2870. PubMed ID: 34382075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of using the combined oral contraceptive pill for cycle scheduling on gene expression related to endometrial receptivity.
Bermejo A; Iglesias C; Ruiz-Alonso M; Blesa D; Simón C; Pellicer A; García-Velasco J
Hum Reprod; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1271-8. PubMed ID: 24706003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Asynchronous and pathological windows of implantation: two causes of recurrent implantation failure.
Sebastian-Leon P; Garrido N; Remohí J; Pellicer A; Diaz-Gimeno P
Hum Reprod; 2018 Apr; 33(4):626-635. PubMed ID: 29452422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Podocalyxin is a key negative regulator of human endometrial epithelial receptivity for embryo implantation.
Paule SG; Heng S; Samarajeewa N; Li Y; Mansilla M; Webb AI; Nebl T; Young SL; Lessey BA; Hull ML; Scelwyn M; Lim R; Vollenhoven B; Rombauts LJ; Nie G
Hum Reprod; 2021 Apr; 36(5):1353-1366. PubMed ID: 33822049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Human endometrial cell-type-specific RNA sequencing provides new insights into the embryo-endometrium interplay.
Koel M; Krjutškov K; Saare M; Samuel K; Lubenets D; Katayama S; Einarsdottir E; Vargas E; Sola-Leyva A; Lalitkumar PG; Gemzell-Danielsson K; Blesa D; Simon C; Lanner F; Kere J; Salumets A; Altmäe S
Hum Reprod Open; 2022; 2022(4):hoac043. PubMed ID: 36339249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Study of altered expression of annexin IV and human endometrial receptivity].
Li J; Tan Z; Li MT; Liu YL; Liu Q; Gu XF; Zhou JZ; Zhuang GL
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Dec; 41(12):803-5. PubMed ID: 17327107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The mid-secretory endometrial transcriptomic landscape in endometriosis: a meta-analysis.
Vargas E; García-Moreno E; Aghajanova L; Salumets A; Horcajadas JA; Esteban FJ; Altmäe S
Hum Reprod Open; 2022; 2022(2):hoac016. PubMed ID: 35464885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Endometrial HLA-F expression is influenced by genotypes and correlates differently with immune cell infiltration in IVF and recurrent implantation failure patients.
Papúchová H; Saxtorph MH; Hallager T; Jepsen IE; Eriksen JO; Persson G; Funck T; Weisdorf I; Macklon NS; Larsen LG; Hviid TVF
Hum Reprod; 2022 Jul; 37(8):1816-1834. PubMed ID: 35689445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Administration of calcitonin promotes blastocyst implantation in mice by up-regulating integrin β3 expression in endometrial epithelial cells.
Xiong T; Zhao Y; Hu D; Meng J; Wang R; Yang X; Ai J; Qian K; Zhang H
Hum Reprod; 2012 Dec; 27(12):3540-51. PubMed ID: 23001774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preimplantation human blastocysts release factors that differentially alter human endometrial epithelial cell adhesion and gene expression relative to IVF success.
Cuman C; Menkhorst EM; Rombauts LJ; Holden S; Webster D; Bilandzic M; Osianlis T; Dimitriadis E
Hum Reprod; 2013 May; 28(5):1161-71. PubMed ID: 23477906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Identifying and optimizing human endometrial gene expression signatures for endometrial dating.
Diaz-Gimeno P; Sebastian-Leon P; Sanchez-Reyes JM; Spath K; Aleman A; Vidal C; Devesa-Peiro A; Labarta E; Sánchez-Ribas I; Ferrando M; Kohls G; García-Velasco JA; Seli E; Wells D; Pellicer A
Hum Reprod; 2022 Jan; 37(2):284-296. PubMed ID: 34875061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High-throughput sperm differential proteomics suggests that epigenetic alterations contribute to failed assisted reproduction.
Azpiazu R; Amaral A; Castillo J; Estanyol JM; Guimerà M; Ballescà JL; Balasch J; Oliva R
Hum Reprod; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1225-37. PubMed ID: 24781426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
