These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25106813)

  • 1. EasyDIAg: A tool for easy determination of interrater agreement.
    Holle H; Rein R
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Sep; 47(3):837-47. PubMed ID: 25106813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reproducible immunohistochemical criteria based on multiple raters' judgments for expression of thymidine phosphorylase in breast cancer tissue.
    Tsuda H; Akiyama F; Kurosumi M; Sakamoto G
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2004 Aug; 86(3):215-23. PubMed ID: 15567938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantifying idiosyncratic and shared contributions to judgment.
    Martinez JE; Funk F; Todorov A
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Aug; 52(4):1428-1444. PubMed ID: 31898288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interrater Agreement on the Visual Analysis of Individual Tiers and Functional Relations in Multiple Baseline Designs.
    Wolfe K; Seaman MA; Drasgow E
    Behav Modif; 2016 Nov; 40(6):852-873. PubMed ID: 27103183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interrater agreement with a standard scheme for classifying medication errors.
    Forrey RA; Pedersen CA; Schneider PJ
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2007 Jan; 64(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 17215468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurement of interrater agreement with adjustment for covariates.
    Barlow W
    Biometrics; 1996 Jun; 52(2):695-702. PubMed ID: 10766505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simultaneous estimation of intrarater and interrater agreement for multiple raters under order restrictions for a binary trait.
    Lester Kirchner H; Lemke JH
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(12):1761-72. PubMed ID: 12111910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Developing auditory-perceptual judgment reliability in otolaryngology residents.
    Misono S; Merati AL; Eadie TL
    J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):358-64. PubMed ID: 22019147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of raters threshold in estimating interrater agreement.
    Nucci M; Spoto A; Altoè G; Pastore M
    Psychol Methods; 2021 Oct; 26(5):622-634. PubMed ID: 34855432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Unfolding the phenomenon of interrater agreement: a multicomponent approach for in-depth examination was proposed.
    Slaug B; Schilling O; Helle T; Iwarsson S; Carlsson G; Brandt Å
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Sep; 65(9):1016-25. PubMed ID: 22742912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interrater agreement statistics with skewed data: evaluation of alternatives to Cohen's kappa.
    Xu S; Lorber MF
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2014 Dec; 82(6):1219-27. PubMed ID: 25090041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement.
    Hoy D; Brooks P; Woolf A; Blyth F; March L; Bain C; Baker P; Smith E; Buchbinder R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Sep; 65(9):934-9. PubMed ID: 22742910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of data characteristics on interrater agreement among visual analysts.
    Wolfe K; Seaman MA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2023 Apr; 56(2):365-376. PubMed ID: 36855817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interrater reliability of posture observations.
    Bao S; Howard N; Spielholz P; Silverstein B; Polissar N
    Hum Factors; 2009 Jun; 51(3):292-309. PubMed ID: 19750793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. More consensus than idiosyncrasy: Categorizing social judgments to examine variability in Mini-CEX ratings.
    Gingerich A; van der Vleuten CP; Eva KW; Regehr G
    Acad Med; 2014 Nov; 89(11):1510-9. PubMed ID: 25250753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Weighting schemes and incomplete data: A generalized Bayesian framework for chance-corrected interrater agreement.
    van Oest R; Girard JM
    Psychol Methods; 2022 Dec; 27(6):1069-1088. PubMed ID: 34766799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Four multi-item interrater agreement options: comparisons and outcomes.
    Kline TJ; Hambley LA
    Psychol Rep; 2007 Dec; 101(3 Pt 1):1001-10. PubMed ID: 18232460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interrater agreement and interrater reliability: key concepts, approaches, and applications.
    Gisev N; Bell JS; Chen TF
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2013; 9(3):330-8. PubMed ID: 22695215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An exploration of the interrater agreement of visual analysis with and without context.
    Ford ALB; Rudolph BN; Pennington B; Byiers BJ
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2020 Jan; 53(1):572-583. PubMed ID: 30924129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rater-based assessments as social judgments: rethinking the etiology of rater errors.
    Gingerich A; Regehr G; Eva KW
    Acad Med; 2011 Oct; 86(10 Suppl):S1-7. PubMed ID: 21955759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.