288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25106901)
1. 3.5 cm artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosion occurs predominantly in irradiated patients.
Simhan J; Morey AF; Singla N; Tausch TJ; Scott JF; Lemack GE; Roehrborn CG
J Urol; 2015 Feb; 193(2):593-7. PubMed ID: 25106901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of 3.5 cm artificial urinary sphincter cuff on primary and revision surgery for male stress urinary incontinence.
Hudak SJ; Morey AF
J Urol; 2011 Nov; 186(5):1962-6. PubMed ID: 21944140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Decreasing need for artificial urinary sphincter revision surgery by precise cuff sizing in men with spongiosal atrophy.
Simhan J; Morey AF; Zhao LC; Tausch TJ; Scott JF; Hudak SJ; Mazzarella BC
J Urol; 2014 Sep; 192(3):798-803. PubMed ID: 24746880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Erosion rates of 3.5-cm artificial urinary sphincter cuffs are similar to larger cuffs.
McKibben MJ; Shakir N; Fuchs JS; Scott JM; Morey AF
BJU Int; 2019 Feb; 123(2):335-341. PubMed ID: 30007096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement in cases requiring revision for erosion and urethral atrophy.
Guralnick ML; Miller E; Toh KL; Webster GD
J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):2075-8; discussion 2079. PubMed ID: 11956443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Impact of Urethral Risk Factors on Transcorporeal Artificial Urinary Sphincter Erosion Rates and Device Survival.
Mock S; Dmochowski RR; Brown ET; Reynolds WS; Kaufman MR; Milam DF
J Urol; 2015 Dec; 194(6):1692-6. PubMed ID: 26141851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter implantation in the irradiated patient.
Sathianathen NJ; McGuigan SM; Moon DA
BJU Int; 2014 Apr; 113(4):636-41. PubMed ID: 24131859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A multicenter study on the perineal versus penoscrotal approach for implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter: cuff size and control of male stress urinary incontinence.
Henry GD; Graham SM; Cornell RJ; Cleves MA; Simmons CJ; Vakalopoulos I; Flynn B
J Urol; 2009 Nov; 182(5):2404-9. PubMed ID: 19762042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Immediate urethral repair during explantation prevents stricture formation after artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosion.
Rozanski AT; Tausch TJ; Ramirez D; Simhan J; Scott JF; Morey AF
J Urol; 2014 Aug; 192(2):442-6. PubMed ID: 24512955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prior Radiation Therapy Decreases Time to Idiopathic Erosion of Artificial Urinary Sphincter: A Multi-Institutional Analysis.
Kaufman MR; Milam DF; Johnsen NV; Cleves MA; Broghammer JA; Brant WO; Jones LA; Brady JD; Gross MS; Henry GD
J Urol; 2018 Apr; 199(4):1037-1041. PubMed ID: 29129780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Complex artificial urinary sphincter revision and reimplantation cases--how do they fare compared to virgin cases?
Lai HH; Boone TB
J Urol; 2012 Mar; 187(3):951-5. PubMed ID: 22264456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Artificial Urinary Sphincter Cuff Erosion Heat Map Shows Similar Anatomical Characteristics for Transcorporal and Standard Approach.
Ortiz NM; Wolfe AR; Baumgarten AS; Ward EE; VanDyke ME; Hudak SJ; Morey AF
J Urol; 2020 Nov; 204(5):1027-1032. PubMed ID: 32459559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement is associated with a higher risk of postoperative urinary retention.
Smith PJ; Hudak SJ; Scott JF; Zhao LC; Morey AF
Can J Urol; 2013 Jun; 20(3):6773-7. PubMed ID: 23783046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perineal approach for artificial urinary sphincter implantation appears to control male stress incontinence better than the transscrotal approach.
Henry GD; Graham SM; Cleves MA; Simmons CJ; Flynn B
J Urol; 2008 Apr; 179(4):1475-9; discussion 1479. PubMed ID: 18295275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combined inflatable penile prosthesis-artificial urinary sphincter implantation: no increased risk of adverse events compared to single or staged device implantation.
Segal RL; Cabrini MR; Harris ED; Mostwin JL; Bivalacqua TJ; Burnett AL
J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2183-8. PubMed ID: 23831315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Difference between urethral circumference and artificial urinary sphincter cuff size, and its effect on postoperative incontinence.
Rothschild J; Chang Kit L; Seltz L; Wang L; Kaufman M; Dmochowski R; Milam DF
J Urol; 2014 Jan; 191(1):138-42. PubMed ID: 23820053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Addition of a second urethral cuff to enhance performance of the artificial urinary sphincter.
Kabalin JN
J Urol; 1996 Oct; 156(4):1302-4. PubMed ID: 8808859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tandem transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff salvage technique: surgical description and results.
Magera JS; Elliott DS
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):1015-9; discussion 1019-20. PubMed ID: 17296400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tandem cuff artificial urinary sphincter as a salvage procedure following failed primary sphincter placement for the treatment of post-prostatectomy incontinence.
DiMarco DS; Elliott DS
J Urol; 2003 Oct; 170(4 Pt 1):1252-4. PubMed ID: 14501735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Artificial Urinary Sphincter is Superior to a Secondary Transobturator Male Sling in Cases of a Primary Sling Failure.
Ajay D; Zhang H; Gupta S; Selph JP; Belsante MJ; Lentz AC; Webster GD; Peterson AC
J Urol; 2015 Oct; 194(4):1038-42. PubMed ID: 25963183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
