These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25107707)

  • 41. Clinical Accuracy Study of an GDH-NAD Blood Glucose Monitoring System Using the Performance Criteria of ISO 15197:2013.
    Yon Hin B; Bueno I; Lowe CR; Jones S
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Mar; 11(2):444-445. PubMed ID: 27578824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A Review of Blood Glucose Monitor Accuracy.
    King F; Ahn D; Hsiao V; Porco T; Klonoff DC
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Dec; 20(12):843-856. PubMed ID: 30376362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Performance Evaluation of Three Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Using ISO 15197: 2013 Accuracy Criteria, Consensus and Surveillance Error Grid Analyses, and Insulin Dosing Error Modeling in a Hospital Setting.
    Bedini JL; Wallace JF; Pardo S; Petruschke T
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Oct; 10(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 26445813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Lot-to-lot variability of test strips and accuracy assessment of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose according to ISO 15197.
    Baumstark A; Pleus S; Schmid C; Link M; Haug C; Freckmann G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 6(5):1076-86. PubMed ID: 23063033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Preanalytic and analytic accuracy: toward more realistic and meaningful self-monitoring of blood glucose submissions for regulatory approval.
    Cembrowski GS
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2011 Jul; 5(4):1014-6. PubMed ID: 21880246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The accuracy evaluation of four blood glucose monitoring systems according to ISO 15197:2003 and ISO 15197:2013 criteria.
    Chen H; Yao Q; Dong Y; Tang Z; Li R; Cai B; Wang R; Chen Q
    Prim Care Diabetes; 2019 Jun; 13(3):252-258. PubMed ID: 30770203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Quality control measures in glucose monitoring.
    Kinghorn HA
    Diabetes Care; 1992 Nov; 15(11):1824. PubMed ID: 1468323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Accuracy of five systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose in the hands of adult lay-users and professionals applying ISO 15197:2013 accuracy criteria and potential insulin dosing errors.
    Jendrike N; Baumstark A; Pleus S; Liebing C; Kamecke U; Haug C; Freckmann G
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2019 Feb; 35(2):301-311. PubMed ID: 29927663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. (Analytical) accuracy of blood glucose meters and patients: how do they come together?
    Heinemann L
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Jan; 7(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 23439154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Fundamental Importance of Reference Glucose Analyzer Accuracy for Evaluating the Performance of Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems (BGMSs).
    Bailey TS; Klaff LJ; Wallace JF; Greene C; Pardo S; Harrison B; Simmons DA
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2016 Jul; 10(4):872-5. PubMed ID: 26902794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Accuracy of the CONTOUR® blood glucose monitoring system.
    Harrison B; Leazenby C; Halldorsdottir S
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2011 Jul; 5(4):1009-13. PubMed ID: 21880245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Accuracy and user performance evaluation of a blood glucose monitoring system.
    Caswell M; Frank J; Viggiani MT; Pardo S; Dunne N; Warchal-Windham ME; Morin R
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Mar; 17(3):152-8. PubMed ID: 25494048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. System accuracy evaluation of 43 blood glucose monitoring systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose according to DIN EN ISO 15197.
    Freckmann G; Schmid C; Baumstark A; Pleus S; Link M; Haug C
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 6(5):1060-75. PubMed ID: 23063032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. System accuracy evaluation of 18 CE-marked current-generation blood glucose monitoring systems based on EN ISO 15197:2015.
    Pleus S; Baumstark A; Jendrike N; Mende J; Link M; Zschornack E; Haug C; Freckmann G
    BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care; 2020 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 31958308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Accuracy of blood glucose meters during hypoglycemia.
    Parker DR; Ismail IA
    Diabetes Care; 1997 Jul; 20(7):1205-7. PubMed ID: 9203466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluation of Analytical Performance of Three Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems: System Accuracy, Measurement Repeatability, and Intermediate Measurement Precision.
    Pleus S; Jendrike N; Baumstark A; Mende J; Haug C; Freckmann G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2019 Jan; 13(1):111-117. PubMed ID: 30286620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Accuracy of portable blood glucose monitors.
    Aboezz R; Miller DR
    J Am Pharm Assoc (2003); 2005; 45(4):514-6. PubMed ID: 16128508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Safety in blood sugar measurements has to be guaranteed. Test strips must be the original thing].
    Krankenpfl J; 1999 Sep; 37(9):331. PubMed ID: 10542562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Caution is required for the evaluation of the accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring devices.
    Hirota Y; Toyoda M; Murata T; Miura J
    J Diabetes Investig; 2020 Jan; 11(1):255. PubMed ID: 31576662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Self-monitoring of blood glucose with a focus on analytical quality: an overview.
    Kristensen GB; Sandberg S
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2010 Jul; 48(7):963-72. PubMed ID: 20441473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.