These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25107864)

  • 1. How to critically appraise the clinical literature.
    Cronin P; Rawson JV; Heilbrun ME; Lee JM; Kelly AM; Sanelli PC; Bresnahan BW; Paladin AM
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Sep; 21(9):1117-28. PubMed ID: 25107864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How to report a research study.
    Cronin P; Rawson JV; Heilbrun ME; Lee JM; Kelly AM; Sanelli PC; Bresnahan BW; Paladin AM
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Sep; 21(9):1088-116. PubMed ID: 25107863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.
    Zeng X; Zhang Y; Kwong JS; Zhang C; Li S; Sun F; Niu Y; Du L
    J Evid Based Med; 2015 Feb; 8(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 25594108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality-adjusted life-years lack quality in pediatric care: a critical review of published cost-utility studies in child health.
    Griebsch I; Coast J; Brown J
    Pediatrics; 2005 May; 115(5):e600-14. PubMed ID: 15867026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: Part 7: systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Manchikanti L; Derby R; Wolfer L; Singh V; Datta S; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(6):929-63. PubMed ID: 19935980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How to perform a critically appraised topic: part 2, appraise, evaluate, generate, and recommend.
    Kelly AM; Cronin P
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Nov; 197(5):1048-55. PubMed ID: 22021495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Care to compare?
    Aston G
    Hosp Health Netw; 2008 Dec; 82(12):38-41, 1. PubMed ID: 19209502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A review of near patient testing in primary care.
    Hobbs FD; Delaney BC; Fitzmaurice DA; Wilson S; Hyde CJ; Thorpe GH; Earl-Slater AS; Jowett S; Tobias RS
    Health Technol Assess; 1997; 1(5):i-iv, 1-229. PubMed ID: 9483154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Critical appraisal of cost-effectiveness and cost-utility studies in health care.
    Soares M; Dumville JC
    Evid Based Nurs; 2008 Oct; 11(4):99-102. PubMed ID: 18815315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Critical Appraisal of Emergency Medicine Educational Research: The Best Publications of 2015.
    Heitz CR; Coates W; Farrell SE; Fisher J; Juve AM; Yarris LM
    Acad Emerg Med; 2017 Oct; 24(10):1212-1225. PubMed ID: 28857348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computerised decision support systems in order communication for diagnostic, screening or monitoring test ordering: systematic reviews of the effects and cost-effectiveness of systems.
    Main C; Moxham T; Wyatt JC; Kay J; Anderson R; Stein K
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 Oct; 14(48):1-227. PubMed ID: 21034668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 5. Diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Manchikanti L; Derby R; Wolfer L; Singh V; Datta S; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(3):517-40. PubMed ID: 19461821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recommendations of the Second Panel on Cost Effectiveness in Health and Medicine: A Reference, Not a Rule Book.
    Carias C; Chesson HW; Grosse SD; Li R; Meltzer MI; Miller GF; Murphy LB; Nurmagambetov TA; Pike JJ; Whitham HK
    Am J Prev Med; 2018 Apr; 54(4):600-602. PubMed ID: 29338958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Critical appraisal of emergency medicine education research: the best publications of 2013.
    Farrell SE; Kuhn GJ; Coates WC; Shayne PH; Fisher J; Maggio LA; Lin M
    Acad Emerg Med; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1274-83. PubMed ID: 25377406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Evidence based clinical practice. Part III -- Critical appraisal of clinical research].
    Nobre MR; Bernardo WM; Jatene FB
    Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2004; 50(2):221-8. PubMed ID: 15286874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
    Manchikanti L
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing variability in results in systematic reviews of diagnostic studies.
    Naaktgeboren CA; Ochodo EA; Van Enst WA; de Groot JAH; Hooft L; Leeflang MMG; Bossuyt PM; Moons KGM; Reitsma JB
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jan; 16():6. PubMed ID: 26772804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Placental growth factor (alone or in combination with soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1) as an aid to the assessment of women with suspected pre-eclampsia: systematic review and economic analysis.
    Frampton GK; Jones J; Rose M; Payne L
    Health Technol Assess; 2016 Nov; 20(87):1-160. PubMed ID: 27918253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Critical appraisal of emergency medicine educational research: the best publications of 2009.
    Kuhn GJ; Shayne P; Coates WC; Fisher J; Lin M; Maggio LA; Farrell SE
    Acad Emerg Med; 2010 Oct; 17 Suppl 2():S16-25. PubMed ID: 21199079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence synthesis to inform model-based cost-effectiveness evaluations of diagnostic tests: a methodological review of health technology assessments.
    Shinkins B; Yang Y; Abel L; Fanshawe TR
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Apr; 17(1):56. PubMed ID: 28410588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.