These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25109019)
41. There and back again: revisiting the on-time effect. Zivony A; Lamy D Vision Res; 2015 Aug; 113(Pt A):11-21. PubMed ID: 25988752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The effect of eccentricity and the adapting level on the café wall illusion. Takeuchi T Percept Psychophys; 2005 Oct; 67(7):1113-27. PubMed ID: 16502834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Challenging the distribution shift: statically-induced direction illusion implicates differential processing of object-relative and non-object-relative motion. Farrell-Whelan M; Wenderoth P; Brooks KR Vision Res; 2012 Apr; 58():10-8. PubMed ID: 22386927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The modulation of haptic line bisection by a visual illusion and optokinetic stimulation. Gallace A; Auvray M; Spence C Perception; 2007; 36(7):1003-18. PubMed ID: 17844966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Spatiotemporal Form Integration: sequentially presented inducers can lead to representations of stationary and rigidly rotating objects. McCarthy JD; Strother L; Caplovitz GP Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Nov; 77(8):2740-54. PubMed ID: 26269386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Background stripes affect apparent speed of rotation. Anstis S; Ito H; Cavanagh P Perception; 2006; 35(7):959-64. PubMed ID: 16970204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The elevator illusion results from the combination of body orientation and egocentric perception. Paillard A; Denise P; Barraud PA; Roux A; Cian C Neurosci Lett; 2009 Oct; 464(3):156-9. PubMed ID: 19683558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Features of the selectivity for contrast polarity in contour integration revealed by a novel tilt illusion. Guidi S; Parlangeli O; Bettella S; Roncato S Perception; 2011; 40(11):1357-75. PubMed ID: 22416593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Effects of stimulus material on the Fröhlich illusion. Kerzel D; Müsseler J Vision Res; 2002 Jan; 42(2):181-9. PubMed ID: 11809472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Effects of orientation-selective adaptation on the Zöllner illusion. Morikawa K Perception; 1987; 16(4):473-83. PubMed ID: 3444730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. A phase mixing model for the frequency-doubling illusion. Wielaard J; Smith RT J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2013 Oct; 30(10):2048-65. PubMed ID: 24322861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Spatial versus temporal grouping in a modified Ternus display. Wallace JM; Scott-Samuel NE Vision Res; 2007 Aug; 47(17):2353-66. PubMed ID: 17632201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Effect of stimulus perspective on perception of oscillation. Martinetti RF Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Jun; 52(3):911-7. PubMed ID: 7267264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Two mechanisms that determine the Barber-Pole Illusion. Sun P; Chubb C; Sperling G Vision Res; 2015 Jun; 111(Pt A):43-54. PubMed ID: 25872181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Are the obtuse angles the key components of the Poggendorff illusion? Wenderoth P; Johnson M Perception; 1981; 10(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 7279545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The horizon line, linear perspective, interposition, and background brightness as determinants of the magnitude of the pictorial moon illusion. Jones SA; Wilson AE Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jan; 71(1):131-42. PubMed ID: 19304603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]